Intel Core i7-7700HQ vs Intel Core i9-13900E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents an unambiguous picture: the Intel Core i9-13900E wins every single head-to-head comparison, 8 out of 8. The scale of the victory varies by workload, but the direction is consistent across all recorded tests.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i9-13900E scores 34,244 against the i7-7700HQ's 5,852, a delta of 82.9%. This is the largest absolute gap in the dataset. The single-core R23 result follows the same pattern: 4,834 for the i9-13900E versus 826 for the i7-7700HQ, also an 82.9% difference. These Cinebench results indicate that the i9-13900E delivers roughly six times the multi-threaded rendering throughput of the older mobile chip.

The gap narrows considerably in Geekbench single-core, where the i9-13900E posts 1,646 against 1,082 for the i7-7700HQ, a 34.3% advantage. This is the closest margin in the entire head-to-head set. Geekbench multi-core shows a 56.8% lead for the i9-13900E, with scores of 8,337 and 3,601 respectively.

Cinebench R15 and R20 results mirror the R23 findings. In R15 multi-core, the i9-13900E scores 3,451 versus 589, an 82.9% delta. R15 single-core shows 487 versus 83, an 83% difference. R20 multi-core records 14,382 against 2,457, again 82.9%; R20 single-core is 2,030 versus 346, an 83% gap. The consistency of these percentages across all Cinebench versions suggests the performance ratio is stable regardless of the workload generation.

The i7-7700HQ does not register a single win in any benchmark category. Its best relative showing is in Geekbench single-core, where it trails by only 34.3%, but it still loses outright. In every other test, the i9-13900E leads by at least 56.8%, and in most cases by over 80%.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Core i9-13900E is the superior processor in every measured dimension. If the choice is between these two parts, the i9-13900E should be selected for any workload that benefits from raw compute, whether single-threaded or multi-threaded.

The i7-7700HQ, despite being a capable part in its own era, cannot compete with the newer and larger i9-13900E. The i9-13900E offers 24 cores and 32 threads against 4 cores and 8 threads, and its boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz versus 3.80 GHz. These specification differences translate directly into the benchmark dominance observed.

For users constrained to the i7-7700HQ, the data shows it still holds a percentile ranking of 65 against all CPUs, placing it in the upper third of the database. However, the i9-13900E also ranks at percentile 65, meaning both parts sit at the same overall percentile despite the massive benchmark gaps. This is because the percentile is computed against all CPUs in the database, and the i7-7700HQ's average benchmark score of 9,493 is actually higher than the i9-13900E's 8,676. This counterintuitive result stems from the different benchmark sets recorded for each part; the i7-7700HQ has additional PassMark scores that boost its average, while the i9-13900E only has Cinebench and Geekbench entries.

The nearest rivals for each part further illustrate the context. The i7-7700HQ sits within 1.5% of the AMD EPYC 7402P, Intel Atom x7835RE, Intel Xeon Platinum 8180, and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX. The i9-13900E sits within 1.1% of the Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i5-8365U, AMD EPYC 7601, and Intel Core i7-10510U. These rival clusters are quite different in nature, with the i7-7700HQ competing against server and workstation parts, while the i9-13900E is compared to mobile and older server chips.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900E wins decisively, scoring 34,244 against the i7-7700HQ's 5,852, a delta of 82.9%.

Q: What is the closest benchmark result between the two?

A: The closest result is in Geekbench single-core, where the i9-13900E leads by 34.3% with 1,646 versus 1,082.

Q: Does the i7-7700HQ have any benchmark wins?

A: No. The recorded data shows 0 wins for the i7-7700HQ and 8 wins for the i9-13900E across all head-to-head tests.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The i7-7700HQ has an average benchmark score of 9,493, which is higher than the i9-13900E's 8,676, despite the i9-13900E winning every head-to-head test. This is because the i7-7700HQ includes additional PassMark scores in its average.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: Both processors share the same percentile ranking of 65 against all CPUs in the database.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The i9-13900E has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the i7-7700HQ boosts to 3.80 GHz.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The i7-7700HQ has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the i9-13900E has 24 cores and 32 threads. Base clock speeds are 2.80 GHz for the i7-7700HQ and 1.80 GHz for the i9-13900E, though the i9-13900E's boost clock of 5.20 GHz far exceeds the i7-7700HQ's 3.80 GHz.

Thermal design power differs as well: the i7-7700HQ is rated at 45 watts, while the i9-13900E is rated at 65 watts. The socket types are incompatible: Intel BGA 1440 for the i7-7700HQ versus Intel Socket 1700 for the i9-13900E. The i7-7700HQ is a mobile part, while the i9-13900E is a desktop part.

Memory support diverges: the i7-7700HQ supports DDR3 and DDR4, while the i9-13900E supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. ECC memory is not supported on the i7-7700HQ but is supported on the i9-13900E.

PCI Express capability differs substantially. The i7-7700HQ offers PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i9-13900E offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: Intel HD Graphics 630 on the i7-7700HQ versus UHD Graphics 770 on the i9-13900E.

The i7-7700HQ was released on January 2, 2017, and is end-of-life, with a launch MSRP of $378. The i9-13900E was released on January 3, 2023, and remains active in production. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two parts spans multiple generations. The i7-7700HQ uses the Kaby Lake architecture, specifically Kaby Lake-H, built on Intel's 14 nm process with a die size of 126 mm². The i9-13900E uses Raptor Lake, specifically Raptor Lake-S, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Both are manufactured by Intel.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The i7-7700HQ has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The i9-13900E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The i9-13900E's larger per-core L2 and six times the shared L3 cache contribute to its benchmark advantage.

The i7-7700HQ belongs to the Core i7 generation (Kaby Lake-H), while the i9-13900E belongs to the Core 13th Gen series, generation Core i9 (Raptor Lake). The part numbers are SR32Q for the i7-7700HQ and SRMG2 for the i9-13900E.

The i7-7700HQ's integrated graphics are Intel HD Graphics 630, while the i9-13900E uses UHD Graphics 770. The i9-13900E also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the i7-7700HQ. The PCIe generation jump from Gen 3 to Gen 5 reflects the newer platform design.

Where Each One Wins

The i9-13900E wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its most dominant results are in Cinebench multi-core tests, where it leads by 82.9% across R15, R20, and R23. This makes it the clear choice for rendering, video encoding, scientific computing, and any heavily parallel workload. The single-core Cinebench results, also around 83% ahead, indicate that even lightly threaded tasks like legacy applications or spreadsheet calculations run substantially faster on the i9-13900E.

The i9-13900E's Geekbench multi-core score of 8,337 versus 3,601 shows a 56.8% advantage, which is still a large margin but smaller than the Cinebench gaps. This suggests that Geekbench's workload mix is less favorable to the i9-13900E's architecture, but the i9-13900E remains firmly ahead. The single-core Geekbench result, a 34.3% lead, is the i9-13900E's smallest win, indicating that the older Kaby Lake core still holds up reasonably well in simple single-threaded tasks.

The i7-7700HQ, while losing every head-to-head test, still has a place in the database's context. Its average benchmark score of 9,493 places it within 1.5% of the AMD EPYC 7402P, Intel Atom x7835RE, Intel Xeon Platinum 8180, and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX. This indicates that for its era, the i7-7700HQ was a competitive mobile processor. Its PassMark results, including a multi-thread score of 6,881 and a single-thread score of 2,045, demonstrate reasonable performance for everyday tasks.

For a user choosing between these two parts today, the i9-13900E is the only sensible pick for any performance-sensitive application. Its 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and 36 MB of L3 cache, make it suitable for modern desktop workloads ranging from content creation to software compilation. The i7-7700HQ, with 4 cores and 8 threads, a 3.80 GHz boost, and 6 MB of L3 cache, is a legacy mobile part that should only be considered for low-power, battery-constrained scenarios where the 45 watt TDP is preferable to the i9-13900E's 65 watts. The data does not support any other use case for the i7-7700HQ against the i9-13900E.