Intel Core i7-4610M vs Intel Pentium 6805 Comparison

The Intel Pentium 6805 is the decisive winner in every head-to-head benchmark against the Intel Core i7-4610M, despite the latter’s higher nominal clock speeds. The Pentium 6805’s lead is remarkably consistent, with single-core and multi-core margins all hovering within a narrow band of 38.1% to 38.9%. This uniformity suggests a fundamental architectural efficiency advantage rather than a workload-specific edge.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data is unambiguous: the Pentium 6805 wins all five shared Cinebench tests, and it does so by nearly identical margins. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Pentium scores 383 against the i7-4610M’s 277, a 38.3% advantage. The R20 multi-core test shows the same story, with 1596 versus 1155, a 38.2% delta. The R23 multi-core result is equally one-sided: 3801 versus 2750, again 38.2% ahead.

Single-core performance tells the same tale. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the Pentium 6805 posts 225 versus 162, a 38.9% lead. The R23 single-core test shows 536 against 388, a 38.1% margin. The near-identical deltas across every test indicate that the Pentium 6805’s advantage is not tied to multi-threading scaling or cache-sensitive workloads, but rather to raw per-clock capability.

The i7-4610M holds zero wins. Its highest relative performance comes in the R15 multi-core test, where it still loses by 38.3%. The only benchmark where the i7-4610M has data that the Pentium lacks is Geekbench, where it scores 1903 multi-core and 1024 single-core, but no comparable Pentium result exists in the pack, so no direct comparison can be drawn. The overall win count is 5-0 in favor of the Pentium 6805.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras and design philosophies. The Pentium 6805 uses the Ice Lake architecture on a 10 nm process, while the i7-4610M uses the older Haswell architecture on a 22 nm node. The Pentium’s die is 123 mm²; the i7’s is 131 mm². The i7-4610M lists 960 million transistors, while the Pentium’s transistor count is not provided.

Both are dual-core parts with four threads, and both share 4 MB of L3 cache. The L1 cache differs: the Pentium 6805 has 80 KB per core, while the i7-4610M has 64 KB per core. L2 cache is identical at 256 KB per core. The Pentium’s larger L1 cache likely contributes to its per-clock efficiency.

Clock speeds favor the i7-4610M on paper. The i7 has a 3.00 GHz base clock and a 3.70 GHz boost, while the Pentium 6805 has a 1.10 GHz base and a 3.00 GHz boost. Yet the Pentium still wins by 38% in every test, meaning its Ice Lake cores execute significantly more instructions per cycle than Haswell cores at comparable or lower frequencies.

Memory support is a major split. The Pentium 6805 uses DDR4 with dual-channel support and a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The i7-4610M uses DDR3, also dual-channel, but with a bandwidth of only 25.6 GB/s. That is exactly half the Pentium’s bandwidth, which likely amplifies the architectural gap in memory-sensitive workloads.

Integrated graphics differ: the Pentium 6805 ships with UHD Graphics (32EU), while the i7-4610M has Intel HD 4600. Both are mobile parts, both are end-of-life, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Pentium uses Intel BGA 1526, the i7 uses Intel Socket G3. The Pentium’s PCIe is Gen 3, while the i7’s is Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Where Each One Wins

The Pentium 6805 wins everywhere that matters in this comparison. It is ahead in every Cinebench test, both single-core and multi-core, across three different Cinebench versions. The single-core advantage is critical for everyday responsiveness, legacy application performance, and any workload that scales poorly across cores. The multi-core lead, while not larger in percentage terms, is substantial in absolute points: 3801 versus 2750 in R23 multi-core gives the Pentium a 1051-point cushion.

The i7-4610M has no benchmark wins to claim. Its only potential advantage is the Geekbench results, but since the Pentium 6805 lacks a Geekbench score in the pack, this cannot be compared directly. The i7’s higher base clock (3.00 GHz versus 1.10 GHz) might suggest better sustained performance under heavy loads, but the benchmark data contradicts that hypothesis — the Pentium wins even in multi-core tests that stress sustained throughput.

For users prioritizing single-threaded tasks like web browsing, office productivity, or older games, the Pentium 6805’s 38.1-38.9% single-core lead is decisive. For multi-threaded rendering or encoding, the Pentium’s 38.2-38.3% multi-core margin is equally commanding. There is no workload category in the data where the i7-4610M comes out ahead.

The Verdict

The Intel Pentium 6805 is the clear choice based on benchmark results. It beats the i7-4610M by roughly 38% in every shared test, a margin that is too large and too consistent to be dismissed. The Pentium’s newer Ice Lake architecture, smaller 10 nm process, and double the memory bandwidth (51.2 GB/s versus 25.6 GB/s) all contribute to its superiority.

The i7-4610M’s only redeeming qualities are its higher base clock and larger transistor count, but neither translates into benchmark wins. The data shows a 5-0 sweep for the Pentium 6805, with no test where the i7 even comes close. The i7-4610M’s percentile rank among all CPUs is 30, barely below the Pentium’s 31, but that near-tie in overall percentile masks the massive head-to-head deltas.

Anyone choosing between these two should pick the Pentium 6805. It is newer, faster in every measured category, and architecturally superior. The i7-4610M is not competitive in any benchmark where both have results. The only reason to consider the i7 would be if a specific system requires its Socket G3 form factor or DDR3 memory support, but from a pure performance standpoint, the Pentium wins outright.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Pentium 6805 wins all multi-core Cinebench tests. It scores 383 versus 277 in R15 (38.3% ahead), 1596 versus 1155 in R20 (38.2% ahead), and 3801 versus 2750 in R23 (38.2% ahead).

Q: How do the single-core scores compare?

A: The Pentium 6805 leads by 38.9% in Cinebench R20 single-core (225 versus 162) and by 38.1% in R23 single-core (536 versus 388). The i7-4610M has no single-core win.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The Pentium 6805 supports DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, exactly double the i7-4610M’s DDR3 bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Do both CPUs have the same core and thread count?

A: Yes, both are dual-core with four threads. They also share the same 4 MB of L3 cache and 256 KB of L2 cache per core. The L1 cache differs: 80 KB per core on the Pentium versus 64 KB per core on the i7.

Q: Which CPU has a higher clock speed?

A: The i7-4610M has a 3.00 GHz base and 3.70 GHz boost, while the Pentium 6805 has a 1.10 GHz base and 3.00 GHz boost. Despite this, the Pentium wins every benchmark.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The Pentium 6805 is built on Intel’s 10 nm process, while the i7-4610M uses the older 22 nm node. The Pentium’s die is 123 mm²; the i7’s is 131 mm².

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Pentium 6805 | Intel Core i7-4610M |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 1100.00 MHz | 3.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.00 GHz | 3.70 GHz |

| TDP | 15 W | 37 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1526 | Intel Socket G3 |

| Architecture | Ice Lake | Haswell |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 22 nm |

| Transistors | Not provided | 960 million |

| Die Size | 123 mm² | 131 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics (32EU) | Intel HD 4600 |

| Launch MSRP | $161 | $346 |

| Release Date | 2020-09-30 | 2014-01-31 |

| Part Number | SRK0U | SR1KY |