Intel Core i7-2710QE vs Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3 Comparison
Intel Core i7-2710QE
Xeon E5-2603 v3
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i7-2710QE vs Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data shows a remarkably narrow performance envelope between the Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3 and the Intel Core i7-2710QE. Across all five Cinebench tests in the database, the Xeon E5-2603 v3 claims victory, but the margins are consistently under one percent. This is not a dominant showing; it is a statistical tie expressed through slightly higher raw scores.
In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Xeon E5-2603 v3 scores 323 against the Core i7-2710QE's 321, a delta of 0.6%. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multicore, where the Xeon posts 1346 and the Core i7 posts 1338, again a 0.6% advantage. Single-core results are equally tight: in Cinebench R20 single-core, the Xeon records 189 versus 188 for the Core i7, a 0.5% lead. The largest delta in the entire comparison appears in Cinebench R23, where the Xeon scores 3207 against 3186 in multicore and 452 against 449 in single-core, both representing a 0.7% edge.
The aggregate picture is consistent: the Xeon E5-2603 v3 wins all five head-to-head benchmarks, but the average benchmark score difference is minimal. The Xeon's average score is 1103, while the Core i7-2710QE sits at 1096. That 7-point gap on a scale where both processors land in the 31st percentile of all CPUs indicates that real-world workloads would likely produce indistinguishable results. The nearest rivals for the Xeon include the Intel Pentium Gold G6605 at a 0% delta and the AMD PRO A12-9800 at -0.1%, while the Core i7-2710QE's closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-2670QM at a 0% delta. Both processors occupy the same performance tier in the database, surrounded by similarly scoring parts.
Where Each One Wins
The benchmark data offers no workload category where the Core i7-2710QE takes a decisive lead. Its single-core scores trail by 0.5% to 0.7%, and its multicore scores trail by similar margins. However, the architectural context suggests different strengths that the raw Cinebench numbers do not fully capture.
The Xeon E5-2603 v3 is a server and workstation part with six physical cores running at 1.60 GHz base clock. It has no boost clock, meaning its performance ceiling is fixed. The Core i7-2710QE is a mobile processor with four cores and eight threads, running at 2.10 GHz base with a 3.00 GHz boost. The higher clock speeds on the Core i7 compensate for its fewer physical cores in threaded workloads, which explains why the multicore scores are so close despite the Xeon having 50% more physical cores.
For sustained multi-threaded server workloads that rely on consistent throughput across many cores, the Xeon's six-core configuration with 15 MB of shared L3 cache provides a structural advantage. The Core i7's 6 MB of shared L3 and dual-channel memory bus limit its scalability in memory-intensive enterprise tasks. Conversely, for mobile or embedded applications where power draw and integrated graphics matter, the Core i7-2710QE offers capabilities the Xeon lacks entirely: Intel HD 3000 integrated graphics and a 45 W TDP versus the Xeon's 85 W TDP.
The data shows the Xeon wins every recorded benchmark, but the Core i7's higher clock speeds and hyper-threading make it competitive in bursty, latency-sensitive workloads. The 3.00 GHz boost clock on the Core i7 versus the Xeon's fixed 1.60 GHz suggests that lightly threaded tasks could favor the Core i7 in practice, even though the Cinebench single-core scores do not reflect a clear advantage.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different Intel design eras and target different market segments. The Xeon E5-2603 v3 is built on the Haswell architecture, specifically Haswell-EP, using a 22 nm process node. It integrates 2,600 million transistors on a 356 mm² die. The Core i7-2710QE uses the older Sandy Bridge architecture on a 32 nm process, with 1,160 million transistors on a 216 mm² die. The process node difference of 22 nm versus 32 nm is significant: the newer node allows the Xeon to pack more than twice the transistors while maintaining a lower clock speed.
Core counts differ as expected for their segments. The Xeon offers six physical cores with six threads, meaning no hyper-threading. The Core i7 offers four cores with eight threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading. The Xeon compensates with a larger shared L3 cache of 15 MB versus the Core i7's 6 MB. Both share the same per-core L1 and L2 cache sizes: 64 KB and 256 KB per core, respectively.
Memory support is a major divergence. The Xeon E5-2603 v3 supports DDR4 memory over a quad-channel bus with a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, a critical feature for server reliability. The Core i7-2710QE uses dual-channel memory with no recorded bandwidth figure in the database, and it does not support ECC. The Xeon's PCIe support is Gen 3 with 40 lanes (CPU only), while the Core i7 has no PCIe information recorded. The Core i7 includes Intel HD 3000 integrated graphics, while the Xeon has no integrated graphics capability.
Sockets and platforms are incompatible. The Xeon uses Intel Socket 2011-3, a server platform, while the Core i7 uses Intel Socket G2 (988B), a mobile platform. The Xeon's market segment is Server/Workstation; the Core i7's is Mobile. Both parts are end-of-life, with the Xeon released in September 2014 and the Core i7 released in January 2011. The Xeon had a launch MSRP of $213; the Core i7 has no recorded launch MSRP.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more physical cores?
A: The Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3 has six physical cores with six threads. The Intel Core i7-2710QE has four physical cores with eight threads.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: No. The Xeon E5-2603 v3 supports ECC memory, while the Core i7-2710QE does not.
Q: What is the clock speed difference between the two?
A: The Xeon E5-2603 v3 runs at a base clock of 1.60 GHz with no boost clock. The Core i7-2710QE runs at a base clock of 2.10 GHz and boosts to 3.00 GHz.
Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?
A: Only the Core i7-2710QE includes integrated graphics, specifically Intel HD 3000. The Xeon E5-2603 v3 has no integrated graphics.
Q: How close are the Cinebench R23 multicore scores?
A: The Xeon E5-2603 v3 scores 3207, while the Core i7-2710QE scores 3186, a difference of 0.7%.
Q: What memory types do the two processors support?
A: The Xeon E5-2603 v3 supports DDR4 memory over a quad-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Core i7-2710QE uses dual-channel memory, with no specific memory type or bandwidth recorded in the database.
Specification Differences
The database records the following differences between the Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3 and the Intel Core i7-2710QE:
Core and thread counts: The Xeon has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Core i7 has 4 cores and 8 threads.
Clock speeds: The Xeon has a base clock of 1.60 GHz and no boost clock. The Core i7 has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.00 GHz.
Thermal design power: The Xeon has a TDP of 85 W. The Core i7 has a TDP of 45 W.
Socket: The Xeon uses Intel Socket 2011-3. The Core i7 uses Intel Socket G2 (988B).
Architecture and process: The Xeon uses Haswell architecture on a 22 nm process with 2,600 million transistors and a 356 mm² die. The Core i7 uses Sandy Bridge on a 32 nm process with 1,160 million transistors and a 216 mm² die.
Cache: The Xeon has 15 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i7 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core.
Memory: The Xeon supports DDR4 with quad-channel bus and 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, plus ECC support. The Core i7 has dual-channel memory, no recorded bandwidth, and no ECC support.
PCIe: The Xeon supports PCIe Gen 3 with 40 lanes (CPU only). The Core i7 has no recorded PCIe information.
Integrated graphics: The Xeon has none. The Core i7 includes Intel HD 3000.
Market segment: The Xeon is for Server/Workstation. The Core i7 is for Mobile.
Release date: The Xeon was released in September 2014. The Core i7 was released in January 2011.
Launch MSRP: The Xeon had a launch MSRP of $213. The Core i7 has no recorded launch MSRP.
Part numbers: The Xeon is SR20A. The Core i7 is SR02T.
Average benchmark scores: The Xeon averages 1103. The Core i7 averages 1096. Both sit in the 31st percentile of all CPUs.