Intel Core i7-14701TE vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark scores for the Intel Core i7-14701TE and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100. The Intel part has a full suite of 17 recorded measurements, while the Qualcomm entry lists zero benchmark results. This makes a direct per-test comparison impossible.

What can be established from the recorded data is the Intel processor's standing among all CPUs. It holds the 78th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 26013. Its nearest rivals in the database are all AMD mobile or low-power desktop chips: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (25981, a 0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (26106, a -0.4% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE (25880, a 0.5% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (26187, a -0.7% delta). These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the Core i7-14701TE sits in a tightly contested performance band.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 carries a 50th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of zero, reflecting the absence of measured results in the database. Without any scores, no head-to-head wins or losses can be awarded. The Intel part's strongest recorded results come from the PassMark suite, where it scores 220520 in data compression, 65792 in integer math, and 50219 in floating point math. In Cinebench, its R23 multicore score is 17035, with a single-core score of 2405. The R20 multicore result is 7154, and the R15 multicore result is 1716.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread performance in the recorded data?

A: Only the Intel Core i7-14701TE has recorded single-thread scores. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2405, and its PassMark single-thread score is 2637. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has no benchmark entries.

Q: How does the Intel chip compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has an average benchmark score of 26013. It is 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 0.5% above the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE, 0.4% below the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, and 0.7% below the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U.

Q: What is the Qualcomm chip's performance percentile?

A: The Snapdragon X1P-64-100 is ranked in the 50th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of zero because no benchmark results are listed for it.

Q: Which processor has a higher core count?

A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 has 10 cores and 10 threads. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, so it has fewer physical cores but more threads due to Hyper-Threading.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 supports LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with a recorded bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has ECC memory support?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports ECC memory. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 does not list ECC memory support.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division of roles. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the only one of the two with any recorded benchmark results, and those results place it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its average score of 26013 puts it in the same performance class as several AMD Ryzen 5 and Ryzen AI 5 parts, with deltas under one percent in either direction. For workloads that rely on the measured Cinebench and PassMark tests, this processor demonstrably delivers competitive multi-threaded and single-threaded performance.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 cannot be evaluated for performance from the database. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero average score reflect a lack of measured data, not a measured outcome. The processor is specified for the mobile segment with a 35 W TDP, 10 cores, and 10 threads, but no benchmark evidence exists to compare it against the Intel part.

For users selecting based on recorded measurements, the Intel Core i7-14701TE is the only option with data to support a decision. It is a desktop part with active production status, and its benchmark profile shows it operating in a tight band around several AMD mobile parts. The Qualcomm chip, while active in production and specified for mobile devices, offers no recorded scores in the database, so no performance-based recommendation can be made from the available information.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 uses 10 cores and 10 threads. Base clocks differ substantially: the Intel part runs at 2.10 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Qualcomm part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no recorded boost clock.

Thermal design power also separates them. The Intel part is rated at 45 W, the Qualcomm part at 35 W. The Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop part, while the Qualcomm chip uses Qualcomm BGA 2073 and is a mobile part. The Intel chip's integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770; the Qualcomm chip uses Adreno X1-85. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the Qualcomm part supports LPDDR5X with a recorded memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on the Intel part but not on the Qualcomm part. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Qualcomm chip provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier set to false, and the Qualcomm part is likewise not multiplier-unlocked.

Release dates are close but not identical. The Intel Core i7-14701TE was released on 2024-06-30, and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 was released on 2024-04-23. Both parts are listed as active in production.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is stark. The Intel Core i7-14701TE is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series with a Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation label. It is manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². Its cache hierarchy is structured as 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-64-100 uses the Oryon codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation. Its manufacturer is listed as unknown, and it is fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process node. No die size is recorded. Its cache layout is different in both size and organization: 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

The process node gap is significant. Intel's 10 nm node contrasts with TSMC's 4 nm node for the Qualcomm part, which typically indicates a denser transistor layout for the latter. The cache configurations point to different design philosophies. Intel allocates a large shared L3 pool of 33 MB, while Qualcomm distributes cache across per-core L1, per-module L2, and a smaller 6 MB shared L3. The Intel part's larger L3 is consistent with a desktop-oriented design, while the Qualcomm part's per-module L2 and smaller shared L3 reflect a mobile-focused approach.

The Intel chip's memory controller accepts both DDR4 and DDR5, giving it flexibility across older and newer platforms. The Qualcomm chip is limited to LPDDR5X, which is typical for low-power mobile designs. The Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes provides more bandwidth headroom for desktop expansion, while the Qualcomm part's PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes is more conservative and suited to mobile integration.

The absence of a boost clock for the Qualcomm part is notable. The Intel chip boosts from 2.10 GHz to 5.20 GHz, a substantial single-core headroom. The Qualcomm chip's base clock of 3.40 GHz is higher than Intel's base, but without a recorded boost figure, the peak frequency potential cannot be assessed from the database.

Both parts lack a 3D V-Cache option, and neither lists total L3 as a separate field. The Intel part has a part number of Q49GSRNJL, while the Qualcomm part is identified as X1P64100. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP.