Intel Core i7-14701TE vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison
Intel Core i7-14701TE
Processor 300
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i7-14701TE vs Intel Processor 300
FAQ
Q: What are the core and thread counts for the Intel Core i7-14701TE and the Intel Processor 300?
A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.
Q: What are the base clock speeds for these two processors?
A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz, and the Intel Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz. The i7-14701TE also has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Processor 300 has no listed boost clock.
Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?
A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, whereas the Intel Processor 300 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?
A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel memory bus. However, the i7-14701TE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor 300 does not.
Q: What integrated graphics do these CPUs include?
A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE includes UHD Graphics 770, and the Intel Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710.
Q: What is the production status of each processor?
A: Both processors are listed as Active production status. The Intel Core i7-14701TE was released on 2024-06-30, and the Intel Processor 300 was released on 2024-01-07.
Architecture Differences
Both processors are built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and use a 10 nm process node from Intel's foundry. They share the same Intel Socket 1700 and support PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The fundamental architectural difference lies in the core configuration and cache hierarchy.
The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and is part of the Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a substantial 33 MB shared L3 cache. Its L1 cache is 80 KB per core, and its L2 cache is 2 MB per core. This larger cache structure supports the processor's higher thread count and multi-threaded workload capacity.
The Intel Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake-S codename and belongs to the Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) generation. It has 2 cores and 4 threads, with a much smaller 6 MB shared L3 cache. Its L1 cache is also 80 KB per core, but its L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core. The die size for the i7-14701TE is 257 mm², while the Intel Processor 300 has a die size of 163 mm².
ECC memory support is another architectural differentiator. The i7-14701TE supports ECC memory, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads. The Intel Processor 300 does not support ECC memory. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.
The integrated graphics differ as well. The i7-14701TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Intel Processor 300 uses UHD Graphics 710. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not available for either.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i7-14701TE demonstrates clear advantages in multi-threaded and cache-heavy workloads. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with 33 MB of L3 cache, position it for tasks that scale with core count and cache capacity. Applications such as video rendering, software compilation, data compression, and scientific simulations would benefit from the higher thread count and larger cache. The data shows the i7-14701TE delivering strong results in Cinebench multi-core tests and PassMark multi-thread benchmarks.
The Intel Processor 300 wins on base clock speed and power efficiency in lightly threaded tasks. Its base clock of 3.90 GHz is substantially higher than the i7-14701TE's 2.10 GHz base clock. For single-threaded or lightly threaded workloads that do not need many cores, the higher clock speed can provide an advantage. The Intel Processor 300 also has a lower die size and fewer cores, which could translate to simpler cooling requirements for basic desktop tasks.
The i7-14701TE has a 45 W TDP, while the Intel Processor 300 has a 46 W TDP. The near-identical TDP figures indicate that the i7-14701TE delivers significantly more multi-threaded performance within the same power envelope, making it the stronger choice for workloads that can utilize its cores.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across several key specification fields. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads. The base clock for the i7-14701TE is 2.10 GHz, and for the Intel Processor 300 it is 3.90 GHz. The i7-14701TE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Processor 300 has no listed boost clock.
Cache configurations differ notably. The i7-14701TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Processor 300 also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core but only 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm² for the i7-14701TE and 163 mm² for the Intel Processor 300.
Memory support shows one key difference: the i7-14701TE supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor 300 does not. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus. The integrated graphics differ, with UHD Graphics 770 on the i7-14701TE and UHD Graphics 710 on the Intel Processor 300. The TDP is 45 W for the i7-14701TE and 46 W for the Intel Processor 300. The i7-14701TE has a launch MSRP of $82 for the Intel Processor 300, while no launch MSRP is listed for the i7-14701TE.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains extensive benchmark results for the Intel Core i7-14701TE, while the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The head-to-head benchmark comparison is therefore based on the i7-14701TE's measured performance against the database's overall CPU population.
In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7-14701TE scores 17035, and in single-core it scores 2405. Cinebench R20 results show 7154 for multi-core and 1010 for single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 1716 for multi-core and 242 for single-core. These scores indicate strong multi-threaded capability relative to the broader CPU pool.
PassMark results for the i7-14701TE include a multi-thread score of 20042 and a single-thread score of 2637. Data compression scores 220520, data encryption scores 11699, and extended instructions scores 14354. Floating point math scores 50219, integer math scores 65792, and find prime numbers scores 143. Random string sorting scores 22760, and physics scores 1860.
The i7-14701TE holds a percentile rank of 78 among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 26013. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 with an average score of 25981 and a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS with an average score of 26106 and a delta of -0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE with an average score of 25880 and a delta of 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U with an average score of 26187 and a delta of -0.7%. These deltas show the i7-14701TE performing within 0.7% of these comparable processors, indicating competitive performance in its class.
The Intel Processor 300 has no benchmark scores recorded and no nearest rivals listed in the database. Its percentile rank of 50 places it at the median of all CPUs, but without measured results, direct performance comparisons cannot be made from the data.
The Verdict
The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the clear choice for multi-threaded workloads. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, and 33 MB of L3 cache provide substantial parallel processing capability. The benchmark data confirms strong multi-core performance with Cinebench R23 multi-core scoring 17035 and PassMark multi-thread scoring 20042. The 5.20 GHz boost clock also gives it solid single-threaded performance when needed. The ECC memory support makes it suitable for data integrity-sensitive applications. Its percentile rank of 78 indicates it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database.
The Intel Processor 300 is positioned for basic desktop usage. Its 2 cores and 4 threads are sufficient for light productivity and everyday tasks. The higher base clock of 3.90 GHz helps in single-threaded scenarios. The 6 MB L3 cache and smaller die size reflect its more modest capabilities. Without recorded benchmarks, its performance level cannot be quantified from the database, but its percentile rank of 50 places it at the median of all CPUs.
The decision between these two processors depends on workload requirements. Users running multi-threaded applications, content creation tools, or data processing tasks should select the Intel Core i7-14701TE. Its 8-core configuration and 33 MB L3 cache deliver the parallel performance needed for demanding workloads. The near-identical TDP values (45 W versus 46 W) mean the i7-14701TE offers substantially more performance within the same power envelope.
Users with basic computing needs, such as web browsing, office applications, or light media consumption, can consider the Intel Processor 300. Its higher base clock provides responsive single-threaded performance, and its smaller die size may simplify system integration. However, the lack of recorded benchmark data means its real-world performance relative to the i7-14701TE cannot be quantified.
The recorded data clearly favors the Intel Core i7-14701TE for performance-oriented builds. The Intel Processor 300 serves a more limited role for entry-level systems where its lower core count is acceptable.