Intel Core i7-14701TE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285T Comparison

The Intel Core i7-14701TE and Intel Core Ultra 9 285T occupy very different positions in the desktop CPU landscape, according to the database records. The i7-14701TE is a Raptor Lake Refresh part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Ultra 9 285T is an Arrow Lake-S design with 24 cores and 24 threads. The benchmark data shows a clear hierarchy between the two, with the Ultra 9 285T winning all 17 recorded head-to-head tests. The magnitude of those wins, however, varies significantly by workload, which makes the comparison more nuanced than a simple performance ranking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results establish the overall performance gap. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ultra 9 285T scores 33,573 versus 17,035 for the i7-14701TE, a difference of 49.3 percent in favor of the Ultra 9. The single-core R23 result shows a similar pattern: 4,739 against 2,405, again a 49.3 percent gap. This consistency across multi-core and single-core tests indicates that the Ultra 9’s advantage is not just about core count but also about per-core efficiency.

The Cinebench R20 and R15 results confirm the same trend. In R20 multi-core, the Ultra 9 scores 14,100 while the i7-14701TE manages 7,154, a 49.3 percent deficit. Single-core R20 shows 1,990 versus 1,010, a 49.2 percent gap. The R15 tests mirror this exactly, with the Ultra 9 posting 3,384 multi-core and 477 single-core, against 1,716 and 242 for the i7-14701TE, both 49.3 percent differences.

PassMark tests reveal where the gap widens or narrows. The largest single delta appears in floating point math, where the Ultra 9 scores 137,923 against 50,219, a 63.6 percent advantage. Data encryption shows a 63.5 percent gap (32,061 versus 11,699). These are compute-heavy workloads that benefit from the Ultra 9’s architecture. The smallest gap is in physics, where the Ultra 9 leads by 34.6 percent (2,842 versus 1,860). Data compression shows a 42.6 percent gap (384,140 versus 220,520), and single-thread performance is 42.4 percent higher (4,576 versus 2,637).

Integer math shows a 50.3 percent gap (132,433 versus 65,792), while extended instructions trail by 47.8 percent (27,477 versus 14,354). Random string sorting is 52.3 percent faster on the Ultra 9 (47,695 versus 22,760), and find prime numbers shows a 58.6 percent gap (345 versus 143). The multi-thread PassMark score is 49.8 percent higher on the Ultra 9 (39,931 versus 20,042).

The average benchmark score tells the overall story: the Ultra 9 285T sits at 51,310, while the i7-14701TE is at 26,013. The Ultra 9’s percentile rank is 91 among all CPUs, compared to 78 for the i7-14701TE. The nearest rivals for the Ultra 9 include the Intel Core i9-14900T (average score 51,015, a 0.6 percent difference) and the Intel Core i9-13900F (51,730, 0.8 percent behind). The i7-14701TE’s closest competitors are AMD parts like the Ryzen AI 5 340 (25,981, 0.1 percent ahead) and Ryzen 5 8640HS (26,106, 0.4 percent behind). This places the i7-14701TE in a lower performance tier altogether.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different foundries and process nodes. The i7-14701TE uses Intel’s 10 nm process, while the Ultra 9 285T is built on TSMC’s 3 nm node. The i7-14701TE has a die size of 257 mm², the Ultra 9 is slightly smaller at 243 mm². The Ultra 9 packs 17,800 million transistors, a figure not recorded for the i7-14701TE.

Core configuration differs fundamentally. The i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, meaning it relies on Hyper-Threading to reach that thread count. The Ultra 9 has 24 cores and 24 threads, with no Hyper-Threading. Cache layouts also differ. The i7-14701TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. The Ultra 9 has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3.

Memory support is a major differentiator. The i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 9 is DDR5-only. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the Ultra 9 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s, a figure not listed for the i7-14701TE. Both support ECC memory.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The i7-14701TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Ultra 9 features Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. PCIe connectivity also changes: the i7-14701TE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Ultra 9 provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

Sockets are incompatible. The i7-14701TE uses Intel Socket 1700, the Ultra 9 uses Socket 1851. Release dates are separated by about six months: the i7-14701TE launched in mid-2024, the Ultra 9 in early 2025. The Ultra 9 has a launch MSRP of $549, while no launch price is recorded for the i7-14701TE.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE reaches 5.20 GHz. The base clocks differ more substantially: 1.40 GHz for the Ultra 9 versus 2.10 GHz for the i7-14701TE.

Q: Does the i7-14701TE support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The Ultra 9 285T supports DDR5 only, which means the i7-14701TE offers more flexibility for builds with existing DDR4 modules.

Q: How much larger is the L3 cache on the Ultra 9?

A: The Ultra 9 285T has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 33 MB on the i7-14701TE. The difference is 3 MB, or roughly 9 percent. The L1 and L2 caches per core are also larger on the Ultra 9.

Q: Which CPU has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Ultra 9 285T ranks in the 91st percentile, while the i7-14701TE ranks in the 78th percentile. This reflects the substantial gap in average benchmark scores: 51,310 versus 26,013.

Q: Are both CPUs unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Both are locked parts, so overclocking is not supported according to the recorded specifications.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The i7-14701TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Ultra 9 285T has a TDP of 35 watts. Despite the lower TDP, the Ultra 9 delivers significantly higher performance in every recorded benchmark.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category. Core count is 8 versus 24, thread count is 16 versus 24. Base clock is 2.10 GHz versus 1.40 GHz, boost clock is 5.20 GHz versus 5.40 GHz. TDP is 45 watts versus 35 watts.

The socket changes from Intel Socket 1700 to Intel Socket 1851. The architecture shifts from Raptor Lake to Arrow Lake, with codenames Raptor Lake-R and Arrow Lake-S respectively. Process node moves from 10 nm (Intel) to 3 nm (TSMC). Die size shrinks from 257 mm² to 243 mm². The Ultra 9 has a recorded transistor count of 17,800 million, while no such figure exists for the i7-14701TE.

Cache configuration differs at every level: L1 per core is 80 KB versus 192 KB, L2 per core is 2 MB versus 3 MB, and shared L3 is 33 MB versus 36 MB. Memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 versus DDR5 only. Memory bandwidth is not recorded for the i7-14701TE but is 102.4 GB/s for the Ultra 9. PCIe lanes from the CPU are 16 for the i7-14701TE and 20 for the Ultra 9, both Gen 5.

Integrated graphics change from UHD Graphics 770 to Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU. Release dates are June 30, 2024 for the i7-14701TE and January 6, 2025 for the Ultra 9. The Ultra 9 has a launch MSRP of $549; the i7-14701TE has no recorded launch MSRP. Both are desktop parts, both support ECC memory, both are active production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T outperforms the Intel Core i7-14701TE in every single recorded benchmark. The smallest gap is 34.6 percent in physics, the largest is 63.6 percent in floating point math. Across all 17 head-to-head tests, the Ultra 9 wins, which corresponds to 17 wins for the Ultra 9 and 0 for the i7-14701TE.

The performance advantage is roughly consistent in percentage terms across Cinebench tests, hovering around 49 percent for both multi-core and single-core. PassMark tests show more variance, from 34.6 percent to 63.6 percent, indicating that the Ultra 9’s architecture particularly excels in floating point and encryption workloads. The i7-14701TE’s higher base clock of 2.10 GHz does not translate into any benchmark win, as the Ultra 9’s higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz and superior architecture compensate.

The average benchmark score difference is substantial: 51,310 versus 26,013, a gap of roughly 97 percent. The Ultra 9’s percentile rank of 91 versus 78 for the i7-14701TE places them in different performance classes. For any workload measured in the database, the Ultra 9 285T is the faster processor.

The i7-14701TE does have some specification advantages. It supports DDR4 memory, which can lower platform costs for users with existing DDR4 modules. Its 45-watt TDP is higher than the Ultra 9’s 35-watt TDP, but that higher power envelope does not yield higher performance. The i7-14701TE also uses the more common Socket 1700, which may be more readily available in existing motherboards.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285T wins in every benchmark category recorded. For multi-threaded productivity, it delivers 49.3 percent higher scores in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 49.8 percent higher in PassMark multithread. For single-threaded tasks, it leads by 42.4 percent in PassMark single-thread and 49.3 percent in Cinebench R23 single-core. The Ultra 9 is the clear choice for any performance-focused workload.

The largest advantages for the Ultra 9 come in floating point math (63.6 percent), data encryption (63.5 percent), and find prime numbers (58.6 percent). These are compute-intensive tasks that benefit from the newer architecture and larger cache. Data compression shows a 42.6 percent advantage, while extended instructions are 47.8 percent faster. Random string sorting is 52.3 percent faster on the Ultra 9.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE has no benchmark wins, but its specifications suggest a different use case. The support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory makes it a more flexible option for system builders who want to reuse older memory. The Socket 1700 platform is widely established, and the 45-watt TDP is modest for a desktop part. The i7-14701TE’s 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for many mainstream workloads, and its 2.10 GHz base clock with 5.20 GHz boost provides responsive single-threaded performance, though the data shows it trails the Ultra 9 significantly.

The Ultra 9 285T, with its 24 cores and 24 threads, 36 MB of L3 cache, and 102.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, is designed for heavy parallel workloads. Its 3 nm process node and TSMC foundry give it a manufacturing advantage. The Arc Xe-LPG integrated graphics with 64 execution units are also more capable than the UHD Graphics 770, though the database does not include graphics benchmarks.

For users who prioritize raw performance across all measured metrics, the Ultra 9 285T is the only choice. For those constrained by platform compatibility, particularly the need for DDR4 or Socket 1700, the i7-14701TE remains a viable option, but the benchmark data shows it cannot match the Ultra 9 in any recorded test.