Intel Core i7-14701TE vs Intel Core Ultra 9 285 Comparison

The Intel Core i7-14701TE and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 occupy different tiers of Intel’s desktop lineup, and the benchmark data reflects a clear performance hierarchy. The Core Ultra 9 285 wins every single recorded benchmark in the database, with its smallest advantage being a 46% lead in single-threaded PassMark tests and its largest a 75.1% lead in data encryption. The Core i7-14701TE, a 45 W part, is not competitive with the 65 W Core Ultra 9 285 in raw performance, but its lower TDP and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory position it for different system requirements.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 9 285 dominates every benchmark category recorded in the database. It wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons, leaving the Core i7-14701TE with zero wins. The largest margins come in memory and data-heavy workloads: data encryption shows a 75.1% delta, floating point math a 74.2% delta, and random string sorting a 69.1% delta. These are significant gaps that indicate the Core Ultra 9 285 handles encryption, scientific calculations, and sorting algorithms with substantially more throughput.

The Core i7-14701TE has no benchmark wins, but its role is defined by efficiency rather than outright performance. With a 45 W TDP compared to the Core Ultra 9 285’s 65 W TDP, the i7-14701TE is the lower-power option. It also supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, while the Core Ultra 9 285 supports DDR5 only. For systems constrained by power budgets or those reusing existing DDR4 memory, the i7-14701TE remains a viable choice despite its performance deficit.

In the database’s percentile rankings, the Core Ultra 9 285 sits at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core i7-14701TE sits at the 78th percentile. The average benchmark score of the Core Ultra 9 285 is 75488, compared to 26013 for the i7-14701TE. The Core Ultra 9 285’s nearest rivals include AMD EPYC 8224P and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D, with deltas of -0.1% and -0.3% respectively. The i7-14701TE’s nearest rivals, such as AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS and AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, show deltas of -0.4% and -0.7%, which places it in a much lower performance class.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The Core i7-14701TE uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The Core Ultra 9 285 uses Arrow Lake, the Arrow Lake-S variant, fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process with a die size of 243 mm² and 17,800 million transistors. The process node difference is substantial: 10 nm versus 3 nm, which contributes to the Core Ultra 9 285’s higher efficiency per transistor.

Core counts differ significantly. The Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285 has 24 cores and 24 threads. The lack of hyperthreading on the Core Ultra 9 285 means its thread count equals its core count, but the additional 16 cores provide far more parallel processing capability. Cache hierarchies also differ: the i7-14701TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. The Core Ultra 9 285 has 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3.

Memory support diverges as well. The Core i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, while the Core Ultra 9 285 supports DDR5 only, also dual-channel, but with a recorded memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The i7-14701TE has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. Both processors support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: the i7-14701TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Core Ultra 9 285 provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated graphics differ. The i7-14701TE uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 9 285 uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics with 64 execution units. The Core Ultra 9 285 also has a higher base clock of 2.50 GHz compared to 2.10 GHz, and a higher boost clock of 5.60 GHz compared to 5.20 GHz. The sockets are incompatible: the i7-14701TE uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 9 285 uses Intel Socket 1851.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results show a consistent 65.2% deficit for the Core i7-14701TE across all six tests. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i7-14701TE scores 1716 against 4933 for the Core Ultra 9 285. Single-core R15 shows 242 versus 696. R20 multicore yields 7154 versus 20556, and R20 single-core yields 1010 versus 2901. R23 multicore, the most demanding of the Cinebench tests, shows 17035 versus 48945, while R23 single-core shows 2405 versus 6909.

PassMark results reveal the widest gaps in specific workloads. Data encryption is the largest difference: 11699 for the i7-14701TE versus 46949 for the Core Ultra 9 285, a 75.1% delta. Floating point math follows closely, with 50219 versus 194988, a 74.2% delta. Random string sorting shows 22760 versus 73651, a 69.1% delta. Extended instructions show 14354 versus 45357, a 68.4% delta. Find prime numbers shows 143 versus 459, a 68.8% delta.

The smallest deltas are in single-threaded PassMark and physics tests. PassMark single-thread shows 2637 versus 4881, a 46% delta, and the physics test shows 1860 versus 3598, a 48.3% delta. The remaining PassMark tests fall in between: multithread shows 20042 versus 56602, a 64.6% delta; data compression shows 220520 versus 602121, a 63.4% delta; and integer math shows 65792 versus 164869, a 60.1% delta.

The Core Ultra 9 285 scores 48945 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is nearly three times the i7-14701TE’s 17035. Even in single-core R23, where the i7-14701TE’s 5.20 GHz boost clock should help, the Core Ultra 9 285’s 6909 score is 65.2% higher than 2405. The data confirms that the Core Ultra 9 285 does not merely scale better with cores; it also wins by a large margin in single-threaded workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 has 24 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Core i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The Core Ultra 9 285 supports DDR5 only. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 scores 48945, while the Core i7-14701TE scores 17035. The delta is 65.2% in favor of the Core Ultra 9 285.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Core i7-14701TE and the Core Ultra 9 285 have ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Core i7-14701TE has a 45 W TDP, while the Core Ultra 9 285 has a 65 W TDP.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Core Ultra 9 285 has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, compared to 5.20 GHz for the Core i7-14701TE.

The Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is the clear performance leader in every recorded benchmark. Its 95th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 75488 place it far above the Core i7-14701TE’s 78th percentile and 26013 average score. For workloads that demand maximum multi-threaded throughput, such as Cinebench R23 multicore where it scores 48945, the Core Ultra 9 285 is the correct choice. Its 75.1% lead in data encryption and 74.2% lead in floating point math also make it the stronger option for encryption and computational tasks.

The Core i7-14701TE is not without purpose. Its 45 W TDP is lower than the Core Ultra 9 285’s 65 W TDP, which matters in power-constrained systems. Its support for DDR4 memory allows builders to reuse older memory modules, reducing the cost of a new build without requiring a new memory purchase. The i7-14701TE also uses Intel Socket 1700, which may be compatible with existing 12th and 13th generation motherboards, whereas the Core Ultra 9 285 requires Intel Socket 1851.

The Core Ultra 9 285 has a launch MSRP of $579. The i7-14701TE has no recorded launch MSRP. The Core Ultra 9 285’s nearest rivals are server-class AMD EPYC parts, which indicates its performance tier. The i7-14701TE’s nearest rivals are mobile and low-power AMD Ryzen parts, which indicates a more modest performance bracket.

For a builder prioritizing raw performance, the Core Ultra 9 285 is the only choice between these two. For a builder with strict power limits or existing DDR4 memory, the Core i7-14701TE provides a functional alternative, but the data shows no benchmark where it outperforms the Core Ultra 9 285.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-14701TE | Intel Core Ultra 9 285 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 24 |

| Threads | 16 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.60 GHz |

| TDP | 45 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Arrow Lake-S |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not available | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 243 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 33 MB (shared) | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not available | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | Not available | $579 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |