Intel Core i7-14701TE vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265H Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H has 16 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Ultra 7 doubles the core count but keeps the same thread count because it lacks Hyper-Threading.

Q: Which CPU wins the single-core Cinebench R23 test?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins Cinebench R23 single-core with a score of 2405, beating the Core Ultra 7 265H (2080) by 15.6%. This is the only head-to-head benchmark where the i7-14701TE comes out ahead.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multi-core Cinebench R20?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265H scores 12131 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, which is 41% higher than the i7-14701TE's 7154. The Ultra 7 also leads by 42.6% in Cinebench R15 multi-core (2989 vs 1716).

Q: What is the difference in average benchmark scores?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265H has an average benchmark score of 41621, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The Core i7-14701TE averages 26013, sitting in the 78th percentile. The Ultra 7's average score is approximately 60% higher.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing node?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265H uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, while the Core i7-14701TE uses Intel's 10 nm process. This node difference contributes to the Ultra 7's higher efficiency and performance density.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i7-14701TE and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H support ECC memory. However, the memory types differ: the i7-14701TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 7 265H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i7-14701TE belongs to the Raptor Lake family, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and is classified as a desktop part. Its 8 cores and 16 threads come from a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores, though the specific P-core and E-core layout is not listed in the database. The processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are handled by UHD Graphics 770.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H uses the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-H, manufactured by TSMC on a 3 nm process. This is a mobile processor using the Intel BGA 2049 socket. It features 16 cores and 16 threads, meaning it does not use simultaneous multithreading despite having twice the core count of the i7-14701TE. The cache hierarchy is larger per core: 192 KB of L1, 3 MB of L2, but the shared L3 is smaller at 24 MB. Memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel mode, with a listed memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. PCIe support is Gen 5 but with only 8 lanes from the CPU. The integrated GPU is Arc Graphics 140T.

The process node difference is significant: 3 nm (TSMC) versus 10 nm (Intel). This explains part of the performance and efficiency gap. The Core Ultra 7 265H also has a lower TDP of 28 watts compared to 45 watts for the i7-14701TE, yet it delivers substantially higher benchmark scores. The L3 cache is smaller on the Ultra 7 (24 MB) than on the i7-14701TE (33 MB), but the per-core L1 and L2 allocations are larger on the Ultra 7. Both processors have locked multipliers and active production status. The i7-14701TE was released on 2024-06-30, while the Ultra 7 265H followed on 2025-01-12.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Core Ultra 7 265H dominates the benchmark comparison with 16 wins out of 17 head-to-head tests. The only exception is Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Core i7-14701TE leads with 2405 versus 2080, a 15.6% advantage.

The largest margins come from PassMark workloads. In data encryption, the Ultra 7 scores 26005 against 11699 for the i7-14701TE, a 55% lead. Find prime numbers shows a 57.3% gap (335 vs 143). Floating point math sees the Ultra 7 at 109123 versus 50219, a 54% difference. Extended instructions favor the Ultra 7 by 46.5% (26805 vs 14354). Random string sorting shows a 44.1% lead for the Ultra 7 (40742 vs 22760).

Cinebench results are similarly one-sided. In R15 multi-core, the Ultra 7 scores 2989 against 1716, a 42.6% advantage. R20 multi-core shows 12131 versus 7154, a 41% gap. R23 multi-core is closer: 19940 versus 17035, only a 14.6% lead for the Ultra 7. Single-core results are mixed: the Ultra 7 wins R15 single-core by 21.2% (307 vs 242) and R20 single-core by 41% (1712 vs 1010), but loses R23 single-core as noted.

PassMark multithread favors the Ultra 7 at 34027 versus 20042, a 41.1% gap. Integer math shows a 23% lead for the Ultra 7 (85479 vs 65792). Physics tests show 2497 versus 1860, a 25.5% advantage. Data compression scores 334711 for the Ultra 7 versus 220520 for the i7-14701TE, a 34.1% gap. Single-thread PassMark scores are 4334 versus 2637, a 39.2% difference.

The overall pattern is clear: the Ultra 7 265H is faster in nearly every measured scenario, often by substantial margins. The i7-14701TE's single win in R23 single-core suggests it retains an edge in certain lightly threaded workloads, but this is an isolated result.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications.

• Cores: 8 (i7-14701TE) versus 16 (Ultra 7 265H)
• Threads: 16 (both)
• Base clock: 2.10 GHz (i7-14701TE) versus 2.20 GHz (Ultra 7 265H)
• Boost clock: 5.20 GHz (i7-14701TE) versus 5.30 GHz (Ultra 7 265H)
• TDP: 45 W (i7-14701TE) versus 28 W (Ultra 7 265H)
• Socket: Intel Socket 1700 (i7-14701TE) versus Intel BGA 2049 (Ultra 7 265H)
• Architecture: Raptor Lake (i7-14701TE) versus Arrow Lake (Ultra 7 265H)
• Process node: 10 nm (i7-14701TE) versus 3 nm (Ultra 7 265H)
• Foundry: Intel (i7-14701TE) versus TSMC (Ultra 7 265H)
• Die size: 257 mm² (i7-14701TE) versus not listed (Ultra 7 265H)
• L1 cache: 80 KB per core (i7-14701TE) versus 192 KB per core (Ultra 7 265H)
• L2 cache: 2 MB per core (i7-14701TE) versus 3 MB per core (Ultra 7 265H)
• L3 cache: 33 MB shared (i7-14701TE) versus 24 MB shared (Ultra 7 265H)
• Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 (i7-14701TE) versus DDR5, LPDDR5X (Ultra 7 265H)
• Memory bandwidth: Not listed (i7-14701TE) versus 102.4 GB/s (Ultra 7 265H)
• PCIe lanes: Gen 5, 16 Lanes (i7-14701TE) versus Gen 5, 8 Lanes (Ultra 7 265H)
• Integrated graphics: UHD Graphics 770 (i7-14701TE) versus Arc Graphics 140T (Ultra 7 265H)
• Market segment: Desktop (i7-14701TE) versus Mobile (Ultra 7 265H)
• Part number: Q49GSRNJL (i7-14701TE) versus SRQAQ (Ultra 7 265H)

Both processors support ECC memory, have locked multipliers, and are marked as Active in production. Neither has a listed launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 7 265H wins across the vast majority of workloads. Its 16 physical cores provide a decisive edge in multi-threaded applications. Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core tests show 42.6% and 41% leads respectively. PassMark multithread shows a 41.1% advantage. Data compression and encryption workloads favor the Ultra 7 by 34.1% and 55%. Floating point math, extended instructions, and prime number calculations all show the Ultra 7 ahead by 54%, 46.5%, and 57.3% respectively. This makes the Ultra 7 the clear choice for content creation, scientific computing, data processing, and any workload that scales with core count.

The Core i7-14701TE wins exactly one benchmark: Cinebench R23 single-core, with a 15.6% margin. This suggests that in a narrow set of lightly threaded scenarios, the i7-14701TE can outperform the Ultra 7. The i7-14701TE also has a larger L3 cache (33 MB versus 24 MB) and more PCIe lanes (16 versus 8), which could benefit certain desktop workloads involving large datasets or multiple expansion devices. Its socket (Intel Socket 1700) is a desktop platform, whereas the Ultra 7 uses a mobile BGA socket, meaning the i7-14701TE is intended for fixed installations while the Ultra 7 targets laptops and compact systems.

The lower TDP of the Ultra 7 (28 W versus 45 W) combined with its higher performance indicates better efficiency, though the database does not provide direct power consumption measurements. The Ultra 7 also offers a much higher memory bandwidth figure (102.4 GB/s) and support for LPDDR5X, which is relevant for memory-intensive tasks in mobile environments.

The Verdict

The data points decisively toward the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H as the stronger processor. It wins 16 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, often by margins exceeding 40%. Its average benchmark score of 41621 places it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core i7-14701TE sits at 26013 and the 78th percentile. The nearest rivals for the Ultra 7 include the Intel Core 7 251TE (0.1% slower), Intel Core i7-14650HX (0.1% faster), Intel Core i7-12850HX (0.4% slower), and AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (0.6% faster). The i7-14701TE's nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (0.1% faster), AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (0.4% faster), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE (0.5% slower), and AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (0.7% faster).

For buyers choosing between these two specific parts, the Ultra 7 265H is the better choice for nearly all applications. Its 16 cores deliver strong multi-threaded performance, its 3 nm process enables higher efficiency at a lower TDP, and its memory bandwidth support is superior. The i7-14701TE retains a niche advantage in Cinebench R23 single-core and offers more PCIe lanes and a larger L3 cache, which may matter for specific desktop configurations. However, the benchmark data shows the Ultra 7 is faster in every other measured test, including all multi-core, all PassMark workloads, and most single-core tests. The i7-14701TE is only preferable in scenarios where its single-core R23 result, larger L3, or desktop socket form factor are decisive factors.