Intel Core i7-14701TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 236V Comparison

Intel Core i7-14701TE and Intel Core Ultra 5 236V represent two distinct design philosophies from Intel, one a desktop-focused Raptor Lake Refresh part with high power limits and the other a mobile-first Lunar Lake chip built for efficiency. In the recorded database, the Core i7-14701TE wins 11 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, while the Core Ultra 5 236V claims 6 wins. The average benchmark score heavily favors the desktop chip at 26013 versus 21952, a difference of 18.5% in favor of the i7-14701TE. However, the Ultra 5 236V counters with decisive victories in single-threaded PassMark tests and specific computational workloads, making the choice dependent on whether the workload prioritizes raw multithreading or efficiency-oriented tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE records an average benchmark score of 26013, which is 18.5% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 236V score of 21952.

Q: How do the two chips compare in multithreaded Cinebench tests?

A: The Core i7-14701TE leads in all Cinebench multithreaded tests. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 17035 versus 15628 for the Ultra 5 236V, a 9% advantage. The delta is consistent at 9% for R15 and R20 multicore as well.

Q: In which benchmarks does the Core Ultra 5 236V outperform the i7-14701TE?

A: The Ultra 5 236V wins in PassMark data encryption (13049 vs 11699, a 10.3% lead), extended instructions (15451 vs 14354, a 7.1% lead), find prime numbers (171 vs 143, a 16.4% lead), floating point math (52774 vs 50219, a 4.8% lead), and single-thread score (3893 vs 2637, a 32.3% lead).

Q: What is the difference in power consumption between the two?

A: The Core i7-14701TE has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core Ultra 5 236V has a TDP of 17 watts. The Ultra 5 236V uses 62.2% less power according to these specifications.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Core i7-14701TE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the Core Ultra 5 236V boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Both have the same base clock of 2.10 GHz.

Q: What are the memory support differences?

A: The Core i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory and has ECC memory support. The Core Ultra 5 236V memory support depends on the motherboard and does not support ECC memory.

The Verdict

The data confirms the Core i7-14701TE as the superior choice for desktop workloads that leverage multithreading and integer-heavy calculations. Its 45 watt TDP and 8 cores with 16 threads provide a substantial edge in Cinebench R23 multicore, where it scores 17035, a 9% lead over the Ultra 5 236V score of 15628. The i7-14701TE also dominates PassMark integer math with a score of 65792, which is 69.7% higher than the Ultra 5 236V score of 38765. This processor is for users running content creation, compilation, or any workload that scales with thread count, as its PassMark multithread score of 20042 surpasses the Ultra 5 236V score of 18375 by 9.1%.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 236V is the pick for mobile applications where power efficiency is critical, with its 17 watt TDP versus the 45 watt TDP of the i7-14701TE. It demonstrates clear wins in PassMark single-thread performance, scoring 3893 versus 2637 for the i7-14701TE, a 32.3% advantage. This indicates superior per-core performance in lightly threaded applications. The Ultra 5 236V also shows strengths in encryption and extended instruction workloads, making it suitable for security-focused tasks and modern vectorized code on the go. Its 3 nm process node from TSMC, compared to the 10 nm node of the i7-14701TE, reflects a newer manufacturing technology aimed at reducing power draw.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench suite shows a uniform victory for the Core i7-14701TE across all six tests. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i7-14701TE scores 1716 against 1575 for the Ultra 5 236V, a 9% delta. Single-core R15 results mirror this pattern, with scores of 242 and 222 respectively, a 9% edge. The R20 tests show the same 9% lead in multicore (7154 vs 6563) and a 9.1% lead in single-core (1010 vs 926). Cinebench R23 multicore delivers 17035 for the i7-14701TE and 15628 for the Ultra 5 236V, while single-core R23 scores are 2405 and 2206, both showing a 9% advantage for the desktop chip.

PassMark tests reveal a split based on workload type. The i7-14701TE wins data compression with 220520 versus 176554, a 24.9% margin, and integer math with 65792 versus 38765, an enormous 69.7% lead. It also takes PassMark multithread (20042 vs 18375, a 9.1% lead), physics (1860 vs 1503, a 23.8% lead), and random string sorting (22760 vs 21628, a 5.2% lead). The Ultra 5 236V counters in data encryption, scoring 13049 versus 11699, a 10.3% improvement. Extended instructions favor the Ultra 5 236V at 15451 versus 14354, a 7.1% gain. Find prime numbers goes to the Ultra 5 236V with 171 versus 143, a 16.4% win. Floating point math is close, with the Ultra 5 236V scoring 52774 against 50219, a 4.8% edge. The most dramatic difference lies in PassMark single-thread tests, where the Ultra 5 236V scores 3893 versus 2637 for the i7-14701TE, a massive 32.3% delta.

Specification Differences

The core count is identical at 8, but the thread count differs significantly. The i7-14701TE supports 16 threads, while the Ultra 5 236V supports only 8 threads. This explains the multithreaded benchmark dominance of the i7-14701TE. The base clocks are equal at 2.10 GHz, but the boost clock diverges, with the i7-14701TE reaching 5.20 GHz and the Ultra 5 236V reaching 4.70 GHz. The TDP rating is a major separator: 45 watts for the i7-14701TE versus 17 watts for the Ultra 5 236V. Socket compatibility is entirely different, with the i7-14701TE using Intel Socket 1700 and the Ultra 5 236V using Intel BGA 2833, indicating the former is a desktop part and the latter is soldered for mobile.

Memory support sees the i7-14701TE supporting DDR4 and DDR5, while the Ultra 5 236V support depends on the motherboard. ECC memory is available on the i7-14701TE but not on the Ultra 5 236V. PCIe lane counts also differ, with the i7-14701TE offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Ultra 5 236V offers Gen 5 with only 4 lanes. The integrated graphics are distinct: UHD Graphics 770 on the i7-14701TE versus Arc 130V on the Ultra 5 236V. The market segment confirms the i7-14701TE as Desktop and the Ultra 5 236V as Mobile. Release dates place the i7-14701TE first at 2024-06-30, followed by the Ultra 5 236V at 2024-09-23.

Architecture Differences

The i7-14701TE is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename, using a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. It features a die size of 257 mm². Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache supports the high multithreaded throughput seen in benchmarks.

The Ultra 5 236V uses Lunar Lake architecture with the same codename, manufactured on a 3 nm process node by TSMC. No die size is recorded. The cache configuration differs substantially: 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and only 8 MB of shared L3 cache. Despite the smaller L3, the larger per-core L1 and L2 caches contribute to its superior single-thread PassMark score of 3893. The architecture also integrates a different graphics solution, Arc 130V, compared to the UHD Graphics 770 on the i7-14701TE.

Where Each One Wins

The Core i7-14701TE wins in all Cinebench tests, including R15, R20, and R23, in both multicore and single-core variants. It also wins PassMark data compression, integer math, multithread, physics, and random string sorting. These victories point to workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, database processing, and scientific simulations that utilize all 16 threads. The 69.7% lead in integer math is particularly notable for financial modeling and general productivity software.

The Core Ultra 5 236V wins in PassMark data encryption, extended instructions, find prime numbers, floating point math, and single-thread tests. This makes it preferable for cryptography, signal processing, and any application that relies on a single core with high IPC. The 32.3% single-thread advantage indicates faster response in everyday tasks like web browsing and office document editing, where only one or two cores are active. The 17 watt TDP also makes it suitable for fanless or ultra-portable designs, where thermal and power constraints are the primary concern.