Intel Core i7-14701TE vs Intel Core i9-11900K Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results in the database show a decisive overall win for the Intel Core i9-11900K, which takes 15 of the 17 recorded head-to-head tests. The i9-11900K’s lead is not marginal in most cases; it is a substantial margin that repeats across rendering, encryption, and general processing workloads.

The most striking result is in the Cinebench suite, where the i9-11900K is consistently about 24% faster than the i7-14701TE. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i9-11900K scores 21,168 against the i7-14701TE’s 17,035, a delta of 24.3%. The single-core result tells the same story: 2,988 versus 2,405, a 24.2% advantage. This pattern holds across R15 and R20 as well, with multi-core deltas of 24.3% and single-core deltas of 24.0% to 24.2%. The consistency of this margin across all three Cinebench versions suggests a fundamental throughput advantage for the older chip, not a workload-specific quirk.

PassMark results amplify the gap in several specialized tests. The i9-11900K leads by 66.7% in random string sorting (37,942 versus 22,760), by 63.1% in extended instructions (23,406 versus 14,354), and by 50% in data compression (330,836 versus 220,520). Integer math shows a 35.7% gap (89,279 versus 65,792), and data encryption shows a 36.8% gap (16,000 versus 11,699). Multi-thread performance in PassMark is 24.9% higher (25,038 versus 20,042), and single-thread performance is 33.1% higher (3,511 versus 2,637). Floating-point math is closer, but the i9-11900K still wins by 5.2% (52,841 versus 50,219).

The i7-14701TE wins only two tests, but they are worth examining closely. In PassMark find prime numbers, the i7-14701TE scores 143 against the i9-11900K’s 68, a 52.4% advantage. This is a massive inversion of the general trend. The other win is in PassMark physics, where the i7-14701TE scores 1,860 versus 1,052, a 43.4% lead. These two results indicate that the newer chip has specific strengths that the older one cannot match, despite losing almost everywhere else.

Where Each One Wins

The data paints a clear picture of workload segmentation. The i9-11900K is the dominant choice for rendering and content creation. Its Cinebench scores, which are 24% higher across the board, directly translate to faster 3D rendering and CPU-based video encoding. The PassMark data compression and encryption results suggest that the i9-11900K is also better suited for file archiving, database workloads, and any task that involves heavy data transformation. The 66.7% lead in random string sorting further reinforces this: sorting and text processing tasks will complete noticeably faster.

The i9-11900K also wins in general integer and floating-point math, with leads of 35.7% and 5.2%, respectively. This covers scientific computing, financial modeling, and everyday office workloads that rely on spreadsheet calculations. The single-thread advantage of 33.1% in PassMark and 24.2% in Cinebench R23 means that even lightly threaded applications, such as legacy software or certain games, will run faster on the i9-11900K.

The i7-14701TE’s wins are narrower but meaningful. The 52.4% advantage in find prime numbers is a classic prime-number sieve test, which is heavily dependent on integer division and branch prediction. The 43.4% lead in physics suggests that the i7-14701TE handles the mathematical modeling and collision detection algorithms used in physics simulations more efficiently. These two tests point toward specific computational patterns, likely involving repetitive integer operations or certain branch-heavy loops, where the newer architecture has a real edge. For users running physics simulations or prime-number-related algorithms, the i7-14701TE is the better choice, but for almost everything else, the i9-11900K prevails.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different generations and are built on different process nodes. The i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake, a 14 nm design, while the i7-14701TE uses Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process. Both have 8 cores and 16 threads, so the thread count is identical, but the underlying implementation differs significantly.

The cache hierarchy is a major differentiator. The i9-11900K has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. That is more than double the L3 capacity for the newer chip, which explains its strong showing in the prime number and physics tests, as larger caches can hold more working data. The L2 cache also differs: the i9-11900K has 512 KB per core, while the i7-14701TE has 2 MB per core, a fourfold increase. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core.

Memory support differs as well. The i9-11900K supports only DDR4 memory, while the i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The i9-11900K has a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the i7-14701TE’s bandwidth is not recorded in the database. The i7-14701TE supports ECC memory, which the i9-11900K does not. PCIe connectivity also differs: the i9-11900K offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the i7-14701TE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The integrated graphics are different generations: UHD Graphics 750 for the i9-11900K and UHD Graphics 770 for the i7-14701TE. The i9-11900K has an unlocked multiplier, meaning it is overclockable, while the i7-14701TE is locked. The i9-11900K has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, while the i7-14701TE has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The i9-11900K has a TDP of 125 watts, while the i7-14701TE has a TDP of 45 watts, a significant power envelope difference that likely explains why the i7-14701TE has lower sustained performance despite the newer architecture. The i9-11900K uses Socket 1200, while the i7-14701TE uses Socket 1700.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous for most workloads. The i9-11900K is the faster processor in nearly every benchmark category, with margins ranging from 5.2% in floating-point math to 66.7% in random string sorting. Its Cinebench results are consistently about 24% higher, which makes it the stronger choice for rendering, video encoding, and any multi-threaded content creation task. The single-thread advantage of 24% to 33% also makes it the better option for everyday responsive computing and lightly threaded applications.

The i7-14701TE is not without merit. Its 52.4% lead in find prime numbers and 43.4% lead in physics show that the newer architecture, with its larger cache and newer process node, has specific strengths in integer-heavy, branch-heavy workloads. The 33 MB L3 cache versus 16 MB is a substantial difference, and for workloads that fit within that larger cache, the i7-14701TE can be significantly faster. The 45-watt TDP also makes it a much more power-efficient part, which is relevant for systems where cooling or energy consumption is a priority.

Who should pick which? For a user building a rendering workstation, running data compression tools, or doing any kind of scientific computing that relies on standard math operations, the i9-11900K is the clear choice based on the recorded scores. For a user running physics simulations, prime-number sieves, or other specialized integer workloads, and who values the lower power draw and ECC memory support, the i7-14701TE has a defined place. The i9-11900K is end-of-life, while the i7-14701TE is active, which may matter for long-term availability, but the benchmark data shows that the older chip still outpaces the newer one in the vast majority of tests.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Core i9-11900K is faster. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 21,168 against the i7-14701TE’s 17,035, a 24.3% advantage. The same margin appears in R15 and R20 multi-core tests.

Q: Does the i7-14701TE win any benchmark?

A: Yes, it wins two tests. It scores 143 in PassMark find prime numbers versus 68 for the i9-11900K, a 52.4% lead, and 1,860 in PassMark physics versus 1,052, a 43.4% lead.

Q: How do the cache sizes compare?

A: The i9-11900K has 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. The i7-14701TE has 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core.

Q: What memory types do they support?

A: The i9-11900K supports DDR4 memory only. The i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The i7-14701TE also supports ECC memory, while the i9-11900K does not.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The i9-11900K has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, while the i7-14701TE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The i9-11900K also has a higher base clock at 3.50 GHz versus 2.10 GHz.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The i9-11900K has a TDP of 125 watts, while the i7-14701TE has a TDP of 45 watts. This makes the i7-14701TE a much lower-power part.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i9-11900K | Intel Core i7-14701TE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | Core 11th Gen | Core 14th Gen |

| Base Clock | 3.50 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.30 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 125 W | 45 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1200 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Rocket Lake | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rocket Lake | Raptor Lake-R |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 10 nm |

| Die Size | 276 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2021-03-15 | 2024-06-30 |

| Launch MSRP | $539 | Not recorded |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |