AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE

CORE STATE Phoenix2
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14701TE

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,854
1,716
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
261
242
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,725
7,154
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,090
1,010
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,395
17,035
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,597
2,405
passmark_data_compression
248,675
220,520
passmark_data_encryption
14,163
11,699
passmark_extended_instructions
17,999
14,354
passmark_find_prime_numbers
83
143
passmark_floating_point_math
39,233
50,219
passmark_integer_math
63,045
65,792
passmark_multithread
21,502
20,042
passmark_physics
1,237
1,860
passmark_random_string_sorting
31,240
22,760
passmark_single_thread
3,909
2,637
passmark_singlethread
3,909
2,637

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE vs Intel Core i7-14701TE

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and Intel Core i7-14701TE are two very different interpretations of the efficient desktop processor. The data shows a clear split in their capabilities, with the AMD part dominating single-threaded and security-related workloads, while the Intel part flexes its muscle in specific math and physics tests. With a total of 13 benchmark wins for the AMD and 4 for the Intel, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is the overall leader in the recorded metrics, but the nature of those wins tells a nuanced story.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result in the database is the single-threaded performance gap. In the PassMark single-thread test, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 3909, which is 48.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701TE's 2637. This is a massive leap, suggesting the Zen 4 architecture's high boost clock of 5.00 GHz is far more effective in lightly-threaded scenarios than the Intel part's 5.20 GHz boost, likely due to architectural efficiency. This trend holds true across the Cinebench suite, where the AMD chip wins every single-core test by a consistent margin of 7.9% to 8%. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD scores 2597 against Intel's 2405, an 8% advantage.

The AMD processor also demonstrates superiority in multi-threaded rendering workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 18395, beating the Intel's 17035 by 8%. This is notable because the Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD has only 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite the core deficit, the AMD part's higher IPC and faster clock speeds allow it to pull ahead in these heavily-threaded rendering tasks.

Beyond rendering, the AMD chip wins decisively in specialized data processing. The PassMark extended instructions test shows AMD scoring 17999 against Intel's 14354, a 25.4% advantage. This suggests that the AMD processor handles complex instruction sets and cryptographic workloads more efficiently. The data encryption test reinforces this, with AMD scoring 14163 versus Intel's 11699, a 21.1% lead. The most extreme victory for the AMD comes in random string sorting, where it scores 31240, beating Intel's 22760 by a staggering 37.3%. This indicates a significant advantage in memory access patterns and cache management for certain algorithmic tasks.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE, however, is not without its victories. Its most dominant win is in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 143 against the AMD's 83, a 42% difference. This is a workload that clearly favors Intel's architecture and cache structure. The Intel part also wins in floating-point math, scoring 50219 versus AMD's 39233, a 21.9% lead. This shows a clear strength in scientific and engineering calculations that rely heavily on FPU performance. It also edges out the AMD in integer math, scoring 65792 to AMD's 63045, a 4.2% margin. Finally, the Intel chip wins the PassMark physics test with 1860 points, beating the AMD's 1237 by 33.5%.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is the clear choice for general productivity, content creation, and any workload that relies on encryption or data compression. Its wins in data compression (248675 vs 220520, a 12.8% lead) and data encryption (14163 vs 11699, a 21.1% lead) make it well-suited for tasks like file archiving, database operations, and secure communications. The massive lead in random string sorting also points to strengths in sorting algorithms and data manipulation. For users whose primary tasks involve single-threaded applications, office productivity, and web browsing, the 48.2% lead in single-thread performance makes the AMD part the obvious choice, as it will feel significantly snappier in everyday use.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the specialist for heavy mathematical and physics-based simulations. Its 42% victory in find prime numbers and 33.5% win in the physics test are significant indicators. This makes it a better fit for specific scientific computing, financial modeling, or engineering simulation software that is heavily optimized for integer and floating-point math. Its win in floating-point math (50219 vs 39233) and integer math (65792 vs 63045) confirms that for number-crunching applications, the Intel processor is the stronger performer.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different platforms. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix2, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. This is a modern, dense node that allows for high clock speeds and efficiency. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, and is built on Intel's 10 nm process. This is an older, less dense process, which explains the Intel chip's larger die size of 257 mm² compared to AMD's 137 mm².

These architectural choices lead to different core configurations. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads. However, the AMD chip compensates with higher base and boost clocks. The AMD has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The AMD's much higher base clock is a key factor in its single-threaded dominance.

Cache hierarchies also differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a much larger 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 cache on the Intel part likely contributes to its strong performance in find prime numbers and physics tests, which can benefit from larger data sets being stored on-chip.

Platform support is another major divider. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The Intel chip uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Intel part also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes. Both have integrated graphics: the AMD uses a Radeon 740M, and the Intel uses UHD Graphics 770.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is the superior processor for most users. It wins in 13 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, including all Cinebench tests and the PassMark multi-thread test. Its 48.2% lead in single-thread performance and 37.3% lead in random string sorting are decisive advantages that will translate to a more responsive system for general use. The AMD chip also has a higher average benchmark score of 28054 compared to Intel's 26013, and it sits at the 80th percentile versus Intel's 78th.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the specialist's choice. It should be selected when the workload is dominated by heavy mathematical computation, specifically integer math, floating-point math, and physics simulations. Its wins in these areas are substantial, and its larger L3 cache and additional cores make it a formidable number-cruncher. However, its weaknesses in single-threaded tasks and data compression make it a less versatile option for general-purpose computing.

For a balanced desktop that handles a mix of productivity, rendering, and everyday tasks, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is the better pick. For a system dedicated to scientific simulation or complex mathematical modeling, the Intel Core i7-14701TE offers the raw computational power needed.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-threaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 3909, which is 48.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-14701TE's score of 2637.

Q: Which processor is better for multi-core rendering?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE wins all multi-core Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 18395, an 8% lead over the Intel's 17035.

Q: Does the Intel processor have any significant wins?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14701TE wins in PassMark physics (1860 vs 1237, a 33.5% lead), find prime numbers (143 vs 83, a 42% lead), and floating-point math (50219 vs 39233, a 21.9% lead).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor supports more memory types?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE supports DDR5 only.

Q: What is the difference in their manufacturing nodes?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 PRO 8500GE
i7-14701TE
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.4
2.1 -38.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.4
2.1 -38.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Multiplier
34
21 -38.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB (shared)
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
45 +28.6%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
115 W
PPT
47 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Raptor Lake
Codename
Phoenix2
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen 4 (Phoenix))
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
20,900 million
—
Die Size
137 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
3.1 GHz up to 3.7 GHz
—
P-Core Turbo
—
5.2 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 740M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001185
Q49GSRNJL
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Wraith Stealth
—
View Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE Details View Core i7-14701TE Details