Intel Core i7-14701E vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Core i7-14701E and the Intel Processor U302L. The recorded data for the U302L shows no benchmark scores, while the i7-14701E has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark measurements. Without paired test runs, a direct comparison of individual test scores is not possible from the recorded data.

The i7-14701E places in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database, with an average benchmark score of 33206. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H with an average score of 33201 and a delta of 0 percent, the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS with an average score of 33244 and a delta of -0.1 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX with an average score of 33091 and a delta of 0.3 percent, and the Intel Core i7-13650HX with an average score of 33089 and a delta of 0.4 percent. The i7-14701E effectively sits within a narrow band of these rivals, all within 0.4 percent of one another.

The U302L holds a 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. The absence of any benchmark entries for the U302L means its performance position cannot be quantified from the database. The i7-14701E, by contrast, delivers measurable multi-threaded performance: 2237 points in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 9321 in R20 multi-core, and 22195 in R23 multi-core. Single-core results reach 315 in R15, 1315 in R20, and 3133 in R23.

PassMark results for the i7-14701E show 282939 in data compression, 14862 in data encryption, 18528 in extended instructions, 176 in find prime numbers, 61873 in floating point math, 81325 in integer math, 26112 in multithread, 2399 in physics, 29158 in random string sorting, and 4305 in single-thread tests. These scores establish a baseline for the i7-14701E's capability across integer, floating-point, and memory-related workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has an average benchmark score of 33206. The Intel Processor U302L has an average benchmark score of 0, indicating no benchmark data is recorded for it.

Q: How do the two processors rank relative to all CPUs in the database?

A: The i7-14701E ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. The U302L ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the core and thread count for each processor?

A: The i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds for each processor?

A: The i7-14701E has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The U302L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The i7-14701E supports ECC memory, while the U302L does not.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The i7-14701E has a TDP of 65 watts. The U302L has a TDP of 15 watts.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14701E is the only one of the two with measurable benchmark performance. Its 83rd percentile ranking and average score of 33206 place it among the stronger desktop processors in the database, and its nearest rivals cluster within 0.4 percent of its average score. The U302L has no benchmark scores, so no performance verdict can be derived from the database for that processor.

The i7-14701E is a desktop part with 8 cores, 16 threads, a 5.40 GHz boost clock, and a 65 watt TDP. The U302L is a mobile part with 5 cores, 6 threads, a 2.40 GHz boost clock, and a 15 watt TDP. The data indicates the i7-14701E is positioned for multi-threaded workloads with its higher core count and clock speeds, while the U302L is positioned for low-power mobile use with its reduced core count and TDP. Users requiring measured performance should select the i7-14701E. The U302L cannot be evaluated for performance from the available data.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specifications. The i7-14701E belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, while the U302L has no series designation. The i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. Base clock speeds differ: 2.60 GHz for the i7-14701E versus 1.20 GHz for the U302L. Boost clock speeds are 5.40 GHz for the i7-14701E and 2.40 GHz for the U302L.

TDP values are 65 watts for the i7-14701E and 15 watts for the U302L. The i7-14701E uses the Intel Socket 1700, as does the U302L. The i7-14701E's cache includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. The U302L has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 10 MB shared L3.

PCIe support differs: the i7-14701E uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the U302L uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the i7-14701E has UHD Graphics 770, and the U302L has UHD Graphics 80EU. ECC memory support is present on the i7-14701E but absent on the U302L. The market segment is Desktop for the i7-14701E and Mobile for the U302L. Release dates differ as well: the i7-14701E was released on 2024-06-30, while the U302L was released on 2024-04-07. The i7-14701E has a part number of Q49FSRNJK, and the U302L has a part number of SRPKGQ5CX.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture and are built on Intel's 10 nm process node, according to the recorded data. The i7-14701E uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, while the U302L uses Raptor Lake-PS. The i7-14701E is listed as Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh), while the U302L is listed as Intel Processor (Raptor Lake).

The die size is recorded only for the i7-14701E at 257 mm². The U302L has no die size recorded. Cache configurations differ substantially: the i7-14701E has 2 MB L2 per core versus 1.25 MB per core for the U302L, and 33 MB shared L3 versus 10 MB shared L3. Both processors support DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel buses. The foundry for both is Intel. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The i7-14701E's integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, while the U302L's are UHD Graphics 80EU, indicating a difference in integrated GPU configuration. The production status for both is Active. The i7-14701E has a generation label of Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh), and the U302L has a generation label of Intel Processor (Raptor Lake).

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data allows for a clear split between the two processors based on their specifications and measured results. The i7-14701E wins on every measurable performance dimension in the database. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, give it the capability for multi-threaded workloads such as rendering, compilation, and scientific computing. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and PassMark multithread score of 26112 confirm this orientation. The i7-14701E also wins on single-thread performance with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4305.

The i7-14701E additionally supports ECC memory, which the U302L does not, and offers Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes versus Gen 4 with 8 lanes on the U302L. Its larger L3 cache of 33 MB versus 10 MB gives it an advantage in workloads that benefit from larger shared cache footprints.

The U302L wins on power efficiency. Its TDP of 15 watts is substantially lower than the i7-14701E's 65 watts, making it suitable for mobile or low-power environments where thermal and energy constraints are primary. Its lower core count of 5 and 6 threads, along with a 2.40 GHz boost clock, align with light-duty tasks typical of mobile computing. The U302L also has a smaller L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 2 MB, which reduces the silicon footprint and power draw.

The U302L has no benchmark scores in the database, so no performance wins can be attributed to it. The i7-14701E holds the 83rd percentile ranking, while the U302L holds the 50th percentile. The i7-14701E is the choice for desktop workloads requiring measured multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, while the U302L is the choice for mobile deployments where the 15 watt TDP and lower core count fit within tighter power budgets.