Intel Core i7-14701E vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-14701E and Intel Processor 300T sit at opposite ends of the desktop performance spectrum. The database contains benchmark results for the Core i7-14701E, while the Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence of data for the 300T makes a direct numerical comparison impossible, but the Core i7-14701E's recorded results are comprehensive and reveal a processor with substantial multi-threaded capability.

The Core i7-14701E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and a single-core score of 3133. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9321 multi-core and 1315 single-core. The R15 results follow the same pattern: 2237 multi-core and 315 single-core. These scores place the processor at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 33206.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Core i7-14701E's standing. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H holds an average score of 33201, a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 33244, which is 0.1 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX records 33091, putting the Core i7-14701E 0.3 percent ahead. The Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 33089, again 0.4 percent behind the Core i7-14701E. The recorded data shows the Core i7-14701E matching or slightly exceeding these four rivals, with the largest margin being 0.4 percent over the Core i7-13650HX.

PassMark workloads further characterize the Core i7-14701E. It scores 282939 in data compression, 14862 in data encryption, and 18528 in extended instructions. Integer math reaches 81325, floating point math 61873, and the processor finds 176 prime numbers per test run. The multi-thread score is 26112, while the single-thread score is 4305. Physics testing yields 2399, and random string sorting completes at 29158.

The Intel Processor 300T lacks recorded benchmarks entirely. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The data indicates the 300T has not been measured in the database, so any performance comparison must rely on the architectural specifications of both parts rather than direct test results.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300T have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Processor 300T has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals on record.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14701E compare to its closest rivals in average score?

A: The Core i7-14701E averages 33206, which is 0.1 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS (33244), 0 percent different from the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (33201), and 0.3 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (33091). It also leads the Intel Core i7-13650HX (33089) by 0.4 percent.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of the Core i7-14701E?

A: The Core i7-14701E sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300T support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Processor 300T has ECC memory support set to false, while the Core i7-14701E supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Processor 300T?

A: The launch MSRP is $82.

Architecture Differences

Both processors use Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and are manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. They share the same Intel Socket 1700 and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel memory bus. Both provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The Core i7-14701E is part of the Core 14th Gen series and uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, while the Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake-S codename. The Core i7-14701E belongs to the Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation, and the 300T belongs to the Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) generation. The die sizes differ: the Core i7-14701E measures 257 mm² and the 300T measures 163 mm².

Cache configurations diverge significantly. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The Core i7-14701E has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The 300T has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core i7-14701E uses UHD Graphics 770, while the 300T uses UHD Graphics 710. The Core i7-14701E supports ECC memory; the 300T does not. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The release dates are distinct: the 300T launched on 2024-01-07, and the Core i7-14701E launched on 2024-06-30.

The part numbers also differ: Q49FSRNJK for the Core i7-14701E and SRN3K for the 300T. The 300T has no series designation on record, while the Core i7-14701E is explicitly in the Core 14th Gen series.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear verdict: the Intel Core i7-14701E is the substantially stronger processor. It has 4 times the cores and 4 times the threads of the Intel Processor 300T. Its 33 MB of shared L3 cache dwarfs the 300T's 6 MB. The Core i7-14701E achieves an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, whereas the 300T sits at the 50th percentile.

The Core i7-14701E's boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz, while the 300T has no recorded boost clock at all. The 300T's base clock of 3.40 GHz is higher than the Core i7-14701E's 2.60 GHz base clock, but the Core i7-14701E compensates with a much higher boost capability and far more compute resources.

The Intel Processor 300T does hold advantages in specific areas. Its TDP is 35 watts versus 65 watts for the Core i7-14701E, making it the lower-power option. Its die is smaller at 163 mm², and it launched earlier. The 300T has a launch MSRP of $82.

Users who need multi-threaded throughput should select the Core i7-14701E. The recorded Cinebench and PassMark scores confirm strong scaling across 16 threads, and the processor matches or edges out four comparable rivals in the database. Users who prioritize minimal power draw and only need basic dual-core operation could consider the 300T, but its performance is unmeasured in the database, so no benchmark evidence supports it.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads; the 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads. The Core i7-14701E has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no boost clock recorded.

TDP differs by 30 watts: 65 watts for the Core i7-14701E and 35 watts for the 300T. Both use the same socket, architecture, process node, foundry, memory support, memory bus, and PCIe configuration.

L2 cache per core is 2 MB on the Core i7-14701E versus 1.25 MB on the 300T. Shared L3 cache is 33 MB versus 6 MB. L1 cache per core is identical at 80 KB.

The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 on the Core i7-14701E and UHD Graphics 710 on the 300T. ECC memory support is true on the Core i7-14701E and false on the 300T. The die size is 257 mm² versus 163 mm². The market segment is Desktop for both, and both are Active in production status.

The Core i7-14701E released on 2024-06-30, about six months after the 300T's release on 2024-01-07. The 300T carries a launch MSRP of $82; the Core i7-14701E has no launch MSRP on record. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701E wins in every measured performance category because the 300T has no recorded benchmarks. The Core i7-14701E's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22195 and single-core score of 3133 demonstrate balanced strength. PassMark results show particular proficiency in data compression (282939) and integer math (81325), which are common in productivity and content-creation workloads.

The Core i7-14701E also wins on memory features. Its ECC memory support matters for systems where data integrity is critical. Its larger 33 MB L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache give it a structural advantage in workloads that reuse data frequently.

The Intel Processor 300T wins on power efficiency. Its 35 watt TDP is less than the Core i7-14701E's 65 watt TDP. Its smaller die size of 163 mm² suggests lower manufacturing footprint. The 300T also has a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz, which could benefit lightly threaded tasks that do not boost, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The 300T has the earlier release date and a recorded launch MSRP of $82. It uses UHD Graphics 710, a less capable integrated solution than the Core i7-14701E's UHD Graphics 770, but it remains an option for basic display output without a discrete GPU.

For workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, scientific simulation, or heavy multitasking, the Core i7-14701E is the only choice with supporting evidence. For a low-power desktop system handling light office tasks or as a minimal server, the 300T's specifications offer a place, but the database contains no performance data to validate its capability. The Core i7-14701E remains the data-backed recommendation for any user needing measured performance.