Intel Core i7-14701E vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Intel Core i7-14701E vs Intel Processor 300

The Intel Core i7-14701E and the Intel Processor 300 occupy opposite ends of the desktop performance spectrum within the same socket generation. The i7-14701E is a high-core-count workhorse with a recorded average benchmark score of 33206, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Processor 300 is a modest dual-core entry point with a 50th percentile ranking. The benchmark database shows the i7-14701E delivering massive multi-threaded advantages, though the Processor 300 counters with a higher base clock and a significantly lower power envelope. These are not competing products for the same buyer; the data indicates they serve entirely different workloads.

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E features 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads. This gives the i7-14701E a 4x advantage in both core and thread counts, which directly explains its dominance in multi-threaded benchmarks.

Q: What is the difference in their recorded benchmark performance?

A: The i7-14701E has an average benchmark score of 33206 across all recorded tests, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database and its average benchmark score is 0, placing it in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The Intel Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz, which is higher than the i7-14701E's base clock of 2.60 GHz. However, the i7-14701E provides a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the Processor 300 has no boost clock listed in the database.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The i7-14701E additionally supports ECC memory, whereas the Intel Processor 300 does not.

Q: What are the differences in integrated graphics?

A: The i7-14701E includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Intel Processor 300 includes UHD Graphics 710. Both are integrated GPU solutions, but the i7-14701E's variant is the higher-tier option.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) for each chip?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has a TDP of 65 watts. The Intel Processor 300 has a TDP of 46 watts, making it the lower-power part of the two.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Raptor Lake architecture and are built on Intel's 10 nm process node, but they diverge in their specific codenames and physical characteristics. The i7-14701E uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, while the Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake-S codename and is part of the Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) generation. The die size differs notably: the i7-14701E measures 257 mm², whereas the Processor 300 is smaller at 163 mm², reflecting the substantial difference in core count and cache capacity.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: the i7-14701E provides 2 MB per core, while the Processor 300 provides 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache presents the largest architectural gap, with the i7-14701E featuring 33 MB shared, versus only 6 MB shared on the Processor 300. This 27 MB difference in L3 cache is a significant factor in the i7-14701E's ability to handle larger working sets and more concurrent threads.

Both processors support Intel Socket 1700, use PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode. The i7-14701E supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Processor 300. Integrated graphics also differ, with the i7-14701E carrying UHD Graphics 770 and the Processor 300 carrying UHD Graphics 710. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as Active in production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table in the database contains no recorded entries, and the win counts for both processors are zero. This means there are no direct comparison scores available for these two specific processors against each other. However, the i7-14701E has a full set of individual benchmark results that illustrate its performance profile, while the Intel Processor 300 has none recorded.

The i7-14701E's Cinebench scores demonstrate its capability across the board. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2237 in multicore and 315 in singlecore. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 9321 multicore and 1315 singlecore. For Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 22195 and the singlecore score is 3133. These results show a strong scaling from single-core to multi-core workloads, with the R23 multicore score being over 7 times the singlecore score.

PassMark results for the i7-14701E provide further granularity. The multithread score is 26112, and the single thread score is 4305. Specific workloads include integer math at 81325, floating point math at 61873, data compression at 282939, data encryption at 14862, extended instructions at 18528, find prime numbers at 176, physics at 2399, and random string sorting at 29158. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in parallel integer and floating-point operations, with particularly strong data compression throughput.

Since the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmarks, the comparison must rely on the architectural and specification differences. The i7-14701E's 8 cores and 16 threads versus the Processor 300's 2 cores and 4 threads suggests a roughly 4x advantage in any fully parallel workload, assuming similar per-core efficiency. The i7-14701E also has a much larger L3 cache, which typically benefits memory-intensive and multi-threaded applications. The Processor 300's higher base clock of 3.90 GHz versus 2.60 GHz may give it a slight advantage in lightly threaded tasks that do not boost, but the i7-14701E's boost clock of 5.40 GHz likely overcomes this in single-threaded scenarios that leverage turbo frequencies.

Specification Differences

The following table summarizes the key specification differences between the two processors, based solely on the recorded data.

| Specification | Intel Core i7-14701E | Intel Processor 300 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 2 |

| Threads | 16 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | None listed |

| TDP | 65 W | 46 W |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 33 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 33206 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 83 | 50 |

| Launch MSRP | None listed | $82 |

The i7-14701E offers 4x the cores and threads, a higher boost clock, double the L2 cache per core, and over 5x the L3 cache. The Processor 300 counters with a higher base clock, lower TDP, smaller die size, and a listed launch MSRP of $82. The i7-14701E also supports ECC memory, which the Processor 300 does not.

The Verdict

The recorded data makes the positioning clear. The Intel Core i7-14701E is a high-performance desktop processor with an average benchmark score of 33206 and an 83rd percentile ranking. Its 8 cores, 16 threads, 33 MB of L3 cache, and boost clock of 5.40 GHz position it for demanding multi-threaded applications, content creation, and heavy productivity workloads. The Intel Processor 300, with 2 cores, 4 threads, 6 MB of L3 cache, and no boost clock listed, is a basic entry-level part. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero recorded benchmark scores indicate it is suited for fundamental computing tasks, not performance-intensive work.

The i7-14701E's nearest rivals in the database are all AMD or Intel mobile/desktop parts with average scores between 33089 and 33244, showing that its performance level is competitive with mid-range Ryzen and Core HX-series chips. The Processor 300 has no nearest rivals listed, and its lack of benchmark data means it cannot be compared on equal footing. For users requiring multi-threading, ECC memory support, and high turbo frequencies, the i7-14701E is the only choice between these two. For users prioritizing low power consumption and a basic computing experience, the Processor 300 is the relevant option.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701E wins decisively in every performance category where data exists. Its 16 threads and 33 MB L3 cache give it a substantial edge in multi-threaded rendering (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22195), data compression (PassMark score of 282939), and integer math (PassMark score of 81325). The ECC memory support makes it suitable for workstation-style reliability use cases. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz also provides strong single-threaded performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 3133 and PassMark single thread score of 4305.

The Intel Processor 300 wins only in the specifications that favor low-power and basic operation. Its TDP of 46 watts is lower than the i7-14701E's 65 watts, making it more energy-efficient for simple tasks. Its base clock of 3.90 GHz is higher, which could provide snappier response in single-threaded applications that do not trigger turbo boosting on the i7-14701E. The smaller die size of 163 mm² may also indicate lower manufacturing complexity. However, without any recorded benchmark scores, the Processor 300 cannot claim any measured performance victory. The i7-14701E is the clear winner in all recorded performance metrics, while the Processor 300 is the appropriate choice only for scenarios where minimal power draw and basic functionality are the primary requirements.