Intel Core i7-14701E vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-14701E and Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL occupy different positions in the database, and the recorded measurements reflect that clearly. The Core i7-14701E has a substantial set of benchmark results, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL has no recorded scores in the database at this time. This makes a direct score-for-score comparison impossible, but the available data for the Core i7-14701E provides context for what the Core Ultra 5 125HL would need to match.

The Core i7-14701E delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22195 and a single-core score of 3133. Its Cinebench R20 results show 9321 in multicore and 1315 in single-core, while the older R15 test produces 2237 multicore and 315 single-core. These scores place the processor at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 33206.

The Core Ultra 5 125HL, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, which reflects the absence of measured results rather than actual performance. The database shows no head-to-head benchmarks between the two processors, and the win count stands at 0 for both. This is a case where the comparison must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than direct test scores.

The nearest rivals for the Core i7-14701E offer some reference points. The AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H scores 33201, a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 33244, a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning the Core i7-14701E trails by a tenth of a percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX scores 33091, a delta of 0.3 percent, and the Intel Core i7-13650HX scores 33089, a delta of 0.4 percent. The Core i7-14701E leads the latter two by fractions of a percent, indicating that its overall average score sits in a tight cluster with these competitors.

The Passmark suite for the Core i7-14701E shows strong results across varied workloads. Data compression reaches 282939, while data encryption hits 14862. Extended instructions score 18528, and floating point math reaches 61873. Integer math delivers 81325, and multithread performance scores 26112. The physics test produces 2399, and random string sorting reaches 29158. Single-thread performance is recorded at 4305, and prime number finding scores 176.

These numbers indicate a processor that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy tasks with competence. The single-thread score of 4305, combined with the R23 single-core result of 3133, suggests strong per-core performance that would likely translate well to lightly threaded applications.

Where Each One Wins

For the Core i7-14701E, the data shows clear strengths in multithreaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22195 is more than seven times the single-core score of 3133, which indicates the processor scales well across its 8 cores and 16 threads. The Passmark multithread score of 26112 reinforces this pattern. The data compression result of 282939 is particularly high, suggesting that the processor handles compression and decompression tasks efficiently.

The single-thread results also favor the Core i7-14701E. A Passmark single-thread score of 4305 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3133 point to strong per-core performance. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz, the highest in this comparison, supports this observation. For workloads that depend on a single thread, such as many older games or lightly threaded applications, the Core i7-14701E should deliver solid responsiveness.

The Core Ultra 5 125HL has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database provides no evidence for where it might win. Its architecture includes 14 cores and 18 threads, which is more cores and threads than the Core i7-14701E, but without test results, the database cannot confirm whether that translates into actual performance advantages. The Core Ultra 5 125HL uses a lower base clock of 1.20 GHz and a lower boost clock of 4.50 GHz, but it also has a lower TDP of 45 watts compared to 65 watts for the Core i7-14701E.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The Core i7-14701E uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry. The Core Ultra 5 125HL uses Meteor Lake, specifically the Meteor Lake-PS variant, built on a 7 nm process node, also at Intel's foundry. The 7 nm node represents a newer manufacturing process, which could offer efficiency advantages, but the database does not include measurements to confirm this.

The cache layouts differ notably. The Core i7-14701E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core Ultra 5 125HL has 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i7-14701E has nearly double the L3 cache, which can benefit workloads that repeatedly access a large working set. The Core Ultra 5 125HL has larger L1 cache per core, which may help with latency-sensitive operations.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Core i7-14701E includes UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL includes Arc Xe-LPG 112EU. The Arc branding suggests a more modern graphics architecture, but the database does not include graphics benchmarks for either processor.

The production status for both is Active, and both have a locked multiplier. The Core i7-14701E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL uses Intel Socket 1851. These sockets are not interchangeable, so a motherboard designed for one will not accept the other.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ significantly. The Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL has 14 cores and 18 threads. The Core Ultra 5 125HL has more physical cores, but the Core i7-14701E has more threads per core, with a 1:2 ratio compared to the Core Ultra 5 125HL's 14:18 ratio, which is less than 1.5 threads per core on average.

Base clocks diverge sharply: the Core i7-14701E runs at 2.60 GHz base and 5.40 GHz boost, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL runs at 1.20 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost. The Core i7-14701E has a 1.40 GHz higher base clock and a 0.90 GHz higher boost clock. TDP also differs: 65 watts for the Core i7-14701E and 45 watts for the Core Ultra 5 125HL.

Memory support shows a distinction. The Core i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL supports DDR5, with the note that support depends on the motherboard. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The Core Ultra 5 125HL has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Core i7-14701E has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

ECC memory support differs: the Core i7-14701E supports ECC, while the Core Ultra 5 125HL does not. This could matter for workstation or server-style workloads where data integrity is critical. PCIe support also differs: the Core i7-14701E offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core Ultra 5 125HL offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The Core i7-14701E has both a newer PCIe generation and more lanes.

The release dates are close. The Core Ultra 5 125HL was released on 2024-04-07, and the Core i7-14701E followed on 2024-06-30. The Core Ultra 5 125HL has a launch MSRP of $325, while the Core i7-14701E has no launch MSRP recorded. The part numbers are Q49FSRNJK for the Core i7-14701E and SRN9D for the Core Ultra 5 125HL.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL has 14 cores, while the Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, which is higher than the Core Ultra 5 125HL's boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL has 18 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL does not.

Q: What PCIe generations and lane counts do the two processors offer?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Q: Which processor has recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has a full set of Cinebench and Passmark scores, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL has no recorded benchmark scores.

The Verdict

The data in the database presents a one-sided comparison. The Intel Core i7-14701E has a complete set of benchmark results, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22195, a Passmark multithread score of 26112, and an average benchmark score of 33206 that places it at the 83rd percentile. Its nearest rivals all score within a fraction of a percent, which indicates that the Core i7-14701E delivers performance comparable to the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H, the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS, the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, and the Intel Core i7-13650HX.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL has no recorded benchmarks, so the database provides no evidence of its actual performance. Its 14 cores and 18 threads suggest potential for multithreaded workloads, and its lower TDP of 45 watts indicates a more power-efficient design. The newer 7 nm process node could offer efficiency benefits, but without measurements, this remains speculative.

For users whose decisions rely on recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14701E is the only processor in this comparison with demonstrated performance. Its higher boost clock, larger L3 cache, ECC support, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity give it a specification advantage on paper. The Core Ultra 5 125HL offers more cores and a lower TDP, but the lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance cannot be verified from the database. The choice, based strictly on available measurements, favors the Core i7-14701E for anyone who needs proven performance across a range of workloads.