Intel Core i7-14701E vs Intel Core Ultra 3 205 Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i7-14701E

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.6 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 3 205

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-S
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.8 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 15 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 57W
ARCHITECTURE Arrow Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,237
2,001
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
315
282
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
9,321
8,339
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,315
1,177
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
22,195
19,856
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,133
2,803
passmark_data_compression
282,939
260,651
passmark_data_encryption
14,862
18,772
passmark_extended_instructions
18,528
22,578
passmark_find_prime_numbers
176
268
passmark_floating_point_math
61,873
75,136
passmark_integer_math
81,325
54,755
passmark_multithread
26,112
26,167
passmark_physics
2,399
2,016
passmark_random_string_sorting
29,158
31,083
passmark_single_thread
4,305
4,575
passmark_singlethread
4,305
4,575

Analysis: Intel Core i7-14701E vs Intel Core Ultra 3 205

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data splits these two processors nearly evenly, with the Intel Core i7-14701E taking 9 wins and the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 taking 8. The victories, however, are not distributed equally in magnitude. The i7-14701E dominates in multi-threaded workloads, while the Core Ultra 3 205 shows clear superiority in specialized instruction sets and single-threaded tasks.

The most decisive margin belongs to the i7-14701E in PassMark integer math, where it scores 81,325 against the Core Ultra 3 205's 54,755, a 48.5% advantage. This is the single largest gap in the entire comparison. The i7-14701E also leads by 19% in PassMark physics (2,399 vs 2,016) and by 11.8% across all Cinebench R23 tests, both multi-core (22,195 vs 19,856) and single-core (3,133 vs 2,803). The Cinebench R15 and R20 suites show identical 11.7% to 11.8% gaps in both single and multi-core tests, indicating a consistent performance advantage across rendering generations.

The Core Ultra 3 205 counters with substantial wins in several PassMark sub-tests. Its biggest victory comes in find prime numbers, scoring 268 versus 176, a 34.3% lead. Data encryption shows a 20.8% advantage (18,772 vs 14,862), and extended instructions and floating point math both show roughly 17.7% to 17.9% leads. The Core Ultra 3 205 also wins PassMark single-thread (4,575 vs 4,305, a 5.9% lead) and random string sorting (31,083 vs 29,158, a 6.2% lead).

The closest contest is PassMark multithread, where the Core Ultra 3 205 edges out the i7-14701E by just 0.2% (26,167 vs 26,112). This near-tie is notable given the i7-14701E's large Cinebench multi-core lead. Data compression falls in favor of the i7-14701E with an 8.6% margin (282,939 vs 260,651).

Overall average benchmark scores reflect these mixed results. The i7-14701E has an average score of 33,206, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The Core Ultra 3 205 averages 31,473, sitting in the 82nd percentile. The i7-14701E's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H with an average score of 33,201, a 0% delta, while the Core Ultra 3 205's closest competitor is the Intel Core 7 240H at 31,483, also a 0% delta.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design generations from Intel. The i7-14701E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The Core Ultra 3 205 uses the Arrow Lake architecture, specifically Arrow Lake-S, fabricated on TSMC's 3 nm node. This process difference is significant: the Core Ultra 3 205 packs 17,800 million transistors into a 243 mm² die, while the i7-14701E's die size is 257 mm² with no transistor count listed in the database.

Core configuration differs sharply. Both have 8 cores, but the i7-14701E supports 16 threads via hyperthreading, while the Core Ultra 3 205 has 8 threads. The i7-14701E has a lower base clock of 2.60 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Core Ultra 3 205 starts at 3.80 GHz base and boosts to 4.90 GHz. The i7-14701E has a 65 W TDP, slightly higher than the Core Ultra 3 205's 57 W.

Cache hierarchies diverge substantially. The i7-14701E provides 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 33 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 3 205 offers 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, but only 15 MB shared L3. The Core Ultra 3 205's larger per-core caches compensate for its smaller shared L3 in single-threaded workloads, while the i7-14701E's larger L3 benefits multi-threaded rendering tasks.

Memory support also separates them. The i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the Core Ultra 3 205 is DDR5-only. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Core Ultra 3 205 lists a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s; no bandwidth figure is recorded for the i7-14701E. ECC memory is supported on the i7-14701E but not on the Core Ultra 3 205.

PCIe connectivity favors the Core Ultra 3 205 with Gen 5 and 20 CPU lanes, versus the i7-14701E's Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: the i7-14701E uses UHD Graphics 770, while the Core Ultra 3 205 uses Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU. Sockets are incompatible: the i7-14701E uses Intel Socket 1700, and the Core Ultra 3 205 uses Intel Socket 1851. Release dates also differ, with the i7-14701E launching in 2024-06-30 and the Core Ultra 3 205 arriving 2025-07-31. The Core Ultra 3 205 has a launch MSRP of $140; no MSRP is listed for the i7-14701E.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E has a higher average benchmark score of 33,206 compared to the Intel Core Ultra 3 205's 31,473. The i7-14701E also ranks in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, one percentile above the Core Ultra 3 205.

Q: How do they compare in Cinebench R23?

A: The i7-14701E wins both tests. In multi-core, it scores 22,195 versus 19,856, a lead of 11.8%. In single-core, it scores 3,133 versus 2,803, also an 11.8% lead.

Q: Where does the Core Ultra 3 205 have its biggest advantage?

A: The Core Ultra 3 205's largest win is in PassMark find prime numbers, where it scores 268 versus the i7-14701E's 176, a 34.3% advantage. It also leads by 20.8% in data encryption and by 17.9% in extended instructions.

Q: Do the two processors have the same number of cores?

A: Yes, both have 8 cores. However, the i7-14701E supports 16 threads while the Core Ultra 3 205 supports 8 threads, meaning the i7-14701E can handle twice as many concurrent threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701E supports ECC memory. The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 does not list ECC memory support.

Q: What are the socket requirements for each?

A: The i7-14701E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the Core Ultra 3 205 uses Intel Socket 1851. These sockets are not interchangeable.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split based on workload type. The Intel Core i7-14701E is the stronger choice for multi-threaded rendering, physics simulation, and integer-heavy computation. Its 11.8% lead in every Cinebench test and 48.5% lead in integer math are decisive. The 16 threads over 8 cores provide a structural advantage for parallel workloads that the Core Ultra 3 205 cannot overcome despite its newer architecture.

The Intel Core Ultra 3 205 wins in single-threaded PassMark tests, specialized instruction execution, encryption, floating point math, and prime number finding. Its 5.9% single-thread lead and 34.3% prime number advantage indicate a more efficient per-core design. The smaller 15 MB L3 cache is offset by larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, which helps in latency-sensitive tasks.

For users prioritizing rendering performance, physics, and integer operations, the i7-14701E delivers consistently higher scores. For users focused on encryption workloads, extended instruction sets, floating point math, and single-threaded responsiveness, the Core Ultra 3 205 is the better fit. The near-tie in PassMark multithread (0.2% difference) shows that the Core Ultra 3 205's efficiency nearly matches the i7-14701E's thread count advantage in certain mixed workloads.

The Core Ultra 3 205's newer 3 nm process from TSMC and 17,800 million transistors represent a more modern design, but the i7-14701E's larger 33 MB L3 cache and 16 threads prove decisive in the majority of benchmark categories. The i7-14701E wins 9 of 17 head-to-head tests; the Core Ultra 3 205 wins 8. The i7-14701E's average score lead of 1,733 points (33,206 vs 31,473) confirms its overall performance advantage.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-14701E | Intel Core Ultra 3 205 |

|----------------|----------------------|------------------------|

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Arrow Lake |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Not listed | 17,800 million |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 243 mm² |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 57 W |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 33 MB (shared) | 15 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2025-07-31 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $140 |

Where Each One Wins

The i7-14701E is the pick for Cinebench rendering workloads across all three versions (R15, R20, R23), with consistent 11.7% to 11.8% leads in both single and multi-core tests. It also wins PassMark integer math by 48.5%, data compression by 8.6%, and physics by 19%. These results point toward use cases involving 3D rendering, video encoding, physics calculations, and general integer-heavy application work.

The Core Ultra 3 205 excels in PassMark find prime numbers with a 34.3% lead, data encryption with a 20.8% lead, extended instructions with a 17.9% lead, and floating point math with a 17.7% lead. It also wins single-thread performance by 5.9% and random string sorting by 6.2%. These strengths align with cryptography, scientific computing, floating-point simulation, and single-threaded application responsiveness.

The PassMark multithread result, a 0.2% win for the Core Ultra 3 205, suggests that in mixed parallel workloads the two processors are nearly equivalent. The i7-14701E's 16 threads versus 8 threads does not automatically translate to a multithread win in every scenario, as the Core Ultra 3 205's higher base clock (3.80 GHz vs 2.60 GHz) and larger per-core caches compensate in certain tasks.

The Core Ultra 3 205 offers more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) and a newer socket (1851 vs 1700), which could matter for expansion in future systems. The i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Core Ultra 3 205 requires DDR5. ECC memory support exists only on the i7-14701E, which may be relevant for workstation or server-adjacent builds. The Core Ultra 3 205's integrated Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU replaces the older UHD Graphics 770 found on the i7-14701E.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i7-14701E
Ultra 3 205
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
8 -50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.6
3.8 +46.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.4
4.9 -9.3%
Frequency (GHz)
2.6
3.8 +46.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.4
4.9 -9.3%
Multiplier
26
38 +46.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
33 MB (shared)
15 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
57 -12.3%
PL1
65 W
57 W
PL2
219 W
76 W
Architecture
Architecture
Raptor Lake
Arrow Lake
Codename
Raptor Lake-R
Arrow Lake-S
Generation
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Ultra 3 (Arrow Lake)
Process Size
10 nm
3 nm
Transistors
—
17,800 million
Die Size
257 mm²
243 mm²
Foundry
Intel
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
—
102.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
—
DDR5 Speed
5600 MT/s
—
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
—
3.2 GHz up to 4.4 GHz
P-Core Turbo
5.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$140
Part Number
Q49FSRNJK
SRVFC
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA18W
Tj Max
100°C
105°C
View Core i7-14701E Details View Core Ultra 3 205 Details