Intel Core i7-14700HX vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a full benchmark profile for the Intel Core i7-14700HX, while the Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the current dataset. As a result, the head-to-head comparison is asymmetrical. The i7-14700HX posts an average benchmark score of 45,953, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs tracked. The i9-14901TE, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of zero, which corresponds to a 50th percentile ranking, indicating that no performance data has been captured for it yet.

Focusing on the measured results, the i7-14700HX shows strong multi-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24,595 in the multi-core test and 2,103 in the single-core test. The Cinebench R20 run yields 13,059 multi-core and 1,843 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 3,812 multi-core and 296 single-core. Geekbench results follow a similar pattern, with a multi-core score of 14,390 and a single-core score of 2,116. These figures indicate a processor that maintains a high ratio of multi-core to single-core throughput, consistent with its 20 cores and 28 threads.

PassMark tests add more granularity. The multi-thread score is 36,566, while single-thread performance registers at 3,947 (also listed as passmark_singlethread with the same value). Integer math scores 131,296, floating-point math scores 93,836, and extended instructions score 25,718. Data compression reaches 438,539, data encryption hits 26,092, and random string sorting finishes at 48,544. Find prime numbers scores 165, and physics scores 2,252.

Because the i9-14901TE lacks any benchmark entries, there are no direct wins to attribute to either part. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both items are zero. The only measurable comparison comes from the i7-14700HX's position relative to its nearest rivals in the database. The AMD EPYC 7303 has an average score of 45,960, a delta of 0 percent versus the i7-14700HX. The AMD EPYC 4364P is nearly identical at 45,970, also with a 0 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46,030, placing the i7-14700HX 0.2 percent behind. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46,062, also 0.2 percent ahead of the i7-14700HX. These margins are negligible, meaning the i7-14700HX sits squarely within a tight performance cluster for its average score.

Where Each One Wins

Given the absence of benchmark data for the i9-14901TE, the use-case split is defined entirely by the i7-14700HX's measured capabilities. The i7-14700HX delivers its strongest results in heavily parallel workloads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 36,566, combined with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,595, points to clear advantages in rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing tasks that scale across cores. Its 20 cores and 28 threads allow it to sustain high throughput across simultaneous operations, and the data compression score of 438,539 reinforces that profile.

Single-thread performance is also solid. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,116 and the PassMark single-thread score of 3,947 indicate responsive performance in lightly threaded applications such as office productivity, web browsing, and legacy software. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 296 is consistent with this pattern. The i7-14700HX does not sacrifice single-core speed for its multi-core capacity, which is a useful balance for mixed workloads.

The i9-14901TE, with 8 cores and 16 threads, is architecturally a lower-core-count part. Its 45-watt TDP and desktop socket suggest an efficiency-oriented design, but without benchmark results, the data cannot confirm any specific wins in power-sensitive or single-threaded scenarios. The database records no scores for it, so no use-case advantages can be substantiated. The i7-14700HX, with a 55-watt TDP and a mobile socket, shows that its higher core count translates directly into measurable performance gains across every recorded test.

For users focused on multi-threaded productivity, the i7-14700HX is the only part with evidence of capability. For users who might prioritize lower power consumption or desktop form factor, the i9-14901TE offers those physical attributes, but the lack of benchmark data means no performance claims can be made from the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same Raptor Lake architecture and the same 10 nm process node, fabricated by Intel. Both have a die size of 257 mm² and use the same per-core cache structure: 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and both support ECC memory. Both include UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics, and both provide PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The core configuration differs significantly. The i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. This is the primary architectural divergence. The i7-14700HX also carries a larger total L3 cache: 33 MB shared, versus 36 MB shared for the i9-14901TE. Interestingly, the i9-14901TE has a slightly larger L3 cache despite having fewer cores, which may reflect a different cache allocation strategy for its desktop design.

The sockets differ. The i7-14700HX uses Intel BGA 1964, a mobile socket, while the i9-14901TE uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. The market segments reflect this: the i7-14700HX is classified as Mobile, and the i9-14901TE is classified as Desktop. The i7-14700HX has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The i9-14901TE has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and the same 5.50 GHz boost clock. The i7-14700HX has a TDP of 55 watts, while the i9-14901TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

The i7-14700HX has an unlocked multiplier, meaning it can be overclocked. The i9-14901TE has a locked multiplier, so its clock speeds are fixed. The release dates also differ: the i7-14700HX was released on January 7, 2024, while the i9-14901TE was released on June 30, 2024. The part numbers are distinct: SRMXG for the i7-14700HX and Q49CSRNJJ for the i9-14901TE. Both are listed as Active in production status.

The codenames differ as well. The i7-14700HX uses Raptor Lake-HX, while the i9-14901TE uses Raptor Lake-R. Both are classified under the Core 14th Gen series, with the i7-14700HX listed as a Core i7 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) and the i9-14901TE as a Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh). Neither part has a listed transistor count or memory bandwidth figure in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads in the database?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The i7-14700HX has an average benchmark score of 45,953. The i9-14901TE has an average benchmark score of 0, because no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How does the i7-14700HX compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The AMD EPYC 7303 has an average score of 45,960 and a delta of 0 percent. The AMD EPYC 4364P has an average score of 45,970 and a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has an average score of 46,030, making the i7-14700HX 0.2 percent behind. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 has an average score of 46,062, also putting the i7-14700HX 0.2 percent behind.

Q: What are the cache sizes for each processor?

A: The i7-14700HX has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. The i9-14901TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The i7-14700HX has a TDP of 55 watts. The i9-14901TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: The i7-14700HX has an unlocked multiplier. The i9-14901TE has a locked multiplier, so it does not support multiplier-based overclocking.

The Verdict

The data in the database is one-sided. The Intel Core i7-14700HX has a complete set of benchmark scores, an average score of 45,953, and a 89th percentile ranking. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmarks, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking. Any selection between them must rely on the measured results available.

For workloads that benefit from high core counts and multi-threaded execution, the i7-14700HX is the only part with evidence of performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,595, Geekbench multi-core score of 14,390, and PassMark multi-thread score of 36,566 all indicate strong parallel throughput. Its 20 cores, 28 threads, and 33 MB of L3 cache support that profile. The single-core results, including a Geekbench score of 2,116 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,947, show that it also handles lightly threaded tasks competently.

The i9-14901TE offers a lower TDP of 45 watts versus 55 watts, a desktop socket, and a larger L3 cache of 36 MB, but the database contains no performance measurements to confirm any advantage from those features. Its 8 cores and 16 threads are fewer than the i7-14700HX, and its locked multiplier limits tuning flexibility. Without benchmark scores, its 50th percentile ranking carries no performance weight.

The recorded data supports choosing the i7-14700HX for any workload where computational performance is the deciding factor. The i9-14901TE remains an unmeasured option, so no performance-based recommendation can be made for it from the database. The i7-14700HX also sits within 0.2 percent of its nearest rivals in average score, confirming that its measured performance is competitive with other high-end parts in the dataset. The i9-14901TE has no rival comparisons available, leaving its position undefined.