Intel Core i7-14700F vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a decisive picture: the Intel Core i7-14700F wins all 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons against the Intel Core i7-14701TE. The margins are substantial across every category, with the smallest gap appearing in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where the 14700F leads by 23.1% (176 vs 143). The largest advantage appears in data encryption, where the 14700F scores 30144 against 11699, a 157.7% delta.

The Cinebench suite shows a remarkably consistent pattern. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the 14700F scores 3540 versus 1716, a 106.3% advantage. The single-core test in R15 shows nearly the same gap at 106.2% (499 vs 242). This consistency continues through Cinebench R20 and R23: multicore deltas sit at 106.2% in both, while single-core deltas are 106.1% and 106.2% respectively. The 14700F delivers 35122 in Cinebench R23 multicore compared to 17035 for the 14701TE, effectively doubling the output.

The PassMark suite reveals where the architectural differences become most pronounced. Integer math shows a 136.8% delta (155808 vs 65792), while random string sorting reaches 145.7% (55918 vs 22760). Floating point math sits at 113.1% (107005 vs 50219). Extended instructions show a 99% delta (28564 vs 14354), and data compression trails at 129.4% (505885 vs 220520). The multithread score mirrors the Cinebench pattern at 106.2% (41317 vs 20042), while single-thread performance shows a smaller but still significant 61.4% gap (4257 vs 2637).

Where Each One Wins

The 14700F wins every benchmark category in the database, but the magnitude of its wins varies by workload type. The largest deltas appear in encryption (157.7%), string sorting (145.7%), and integer math (136.8%). These tasks benefit from the 14700F's higher core count and thread count, allowing parallel execution to scale more effectively. Data compression also shows a strong 129.4% advantage, again favoring the additional parallel resources.

The smallest gaps appear in prime number finding (23.1%) and physics simulation (32%). These workloads tend to rely more on per-core efficiency and cache behavior rather than raw thread scaling. The single-thread tests show a 61.4% delta, which is notable because both processors share the same architecture and cache hierarchy. The 14701TE's lower boost clock of 5.20 GHz compared to 5.40 GHz on the 14700F explains part of this gap, though the difference in core count does not directly factor into single-thread results.

For workloads that scale with cores, such as video rendering, code compilation, or scientific computing, the 14700F's 20 cores and 28 threads provide a clear structural advantage over the 14701TE's 8 cores and 16 threads. The multithread benchmark confirms this with a 106.2% delta, meaning the 14700F delivers roughly double the throughput. For lightly threaded tasks, the 14700F still leads, but the margin narrows to the 61.4% seen in single-thread tests.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same fundamental architecture: Raptor Lake-R, built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². They use the same Intel Socket 1700 and support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. Both implement ECC memory support and offer PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L3 is 33 MB shared across both designs.

The critical difference lies in core configuration. The 14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the 14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads. This explains the near-doubling of multicore performance across all Cinebench versions and the PassMark multithread test. The 14701TE compensates partially with a lower TDP of 45 watts versus 65 watts for the 14700F, making it a more power-conscious design.

Clock speeds differ as well. Both have a base clock of 2.10 GHz, but the 14700F boosts to 5.40 GHz versus 5.20 GHz for the 14701TE. This 0.20 GHz difference contributes to the single-thread performance gap observed in the data. The 14700F also carries a launch MSRP of $359, while the 14701TE has no recorded launch MSRP.

A notable feature difference appears in integrated graphics. The 14701TE includes UHD Graphics 770, while the 14700F has no integrated graphics (N/A). This means the 14700F requires a discrete GPU for display output, while the 14701TE can operate without one in basic configurations. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither supports overclocking. The 14700F was released on 2024-01-07, while the 14701TE followed on 2024-06-30.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to the Intel Core i7-14700F as the stronger processor in every measured category. Its 17 wins against 0 for the 14701TE leave no ambiguity in performance comparisons. The 14700F sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database with an average benchmark score of 53620, placing it near the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701, -0.2% delta) and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X (53288, 0.6% delta). In contrast, the 14701TE ranks at the 78th percentile with an average score of 26013, closely matching the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (25981, 0.1% delta) and AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (26106, -0.4% delta).

Users requiring maximum multi-threaded throughput should select the 14700F. Its 20 cores and 28 threads deliver roughly double the performance of the 14701TE in Cinebench R23 multicore and PassMark multithread tests. The 14700F also leads in single-thread performance by 61.4%, so even lightly threaded applications run faster.

The 14701TE's case rests on its 45 watt TDP and integrated UHD Graphics 770. Systems that prioritize energy efficiency or need a processor with built-in display output would find this configuration suitable, provided the reduced core count and lower boost clock are acceptable. The 14701TE remains an active product and holds its own against comparable mobile and low-power desktop parts, but it cannot match the 14700F in any benchmark category recorded here.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The 14700F scores 35122 while the 14701TE scores 17035, a 106.2% delta in favor of the 14700F.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and both support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE includes UHD Graphics 770. The Intel Core i7-14700F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The 14700F boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the 14701TE boosts to 5.20 GHz. Both have a base clock of 2.10 GHz.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare to nearby rivals?

A: The 14700F averages 53620, close to the Intel Xeon 6505P at 53701. The 14701TE averages 26013, similar to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 at 25981.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Core i7-14700F | Intel Core i7-14701TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 20 | 8 |

| Threads | 28 | 16 |

| Boost Clock | 5.40 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 65 watts | 45 watts |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2024-06-30 |

| Launch MSRP | $359 | Not recorded |

| Part Number | SRN3Z | Q49GSRNJL |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 91 | 78 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 53620 | 26013 |