Intel Core i7-1375PRE vs Intel Xeon W-1290 Comparison

The Intel Core i7-1375PRE and Intel Xeon W-1290 are both active Intel processors, yet they target fundamentally different segments of the market. The i7-1375PRE is a mobile Raptor Lake part designed for power-efficient laptops, while the Xeon W-1290 is a server/workstation chip built for sustained desktop performance. Benchmark data shows the i7-1375PRE winning all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, but the margins are surprisingly slim given the architectural gap. The i7-1375PRE holds a 1.1% to 1.2% lead across every benchmark, with the largest single-core advantage being 1.2% in Cinebench R15. Both processors sit at the 59th percentile of all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores are separated by just 1.1%, with the i7-1375PRE scoring 4985 against the Xeon’s 4932.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-1375PRE wins all three multi-core Cinebench tests. It scores 1737 in R15, 7239 in R20, and 17236 in R23, while the Xeon W-1290 scores 1718, 7162, and 17054 respectively. The delta is a consistent 1.1% in favor of the i7-1375PRE.

Q: How do their single-core scores compare?

A: The i7-1375PRE also leads in single-core performance, with scores of 245 in R15, 1021 in R20, and 2433 in R23. The Xeon W-1290 trails at 242, 1010, and 2407. The single-core deltas range from 1.1% to 1.2%.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration difference?

A: The i7-1375PRE features 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Xeon W-1290 has 10 cores and 20 threads. Despite having 4 fewer cores, the Xeon matches the thread count due to Hyper-Threading on all its cores.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon W-1290 supports ECC memory, a critical feature for workstation reliability. The i7-1375PRE does not support ECC memory.

Q: How does the launch MSRP differ?

A: The Xeon W-1290 has a launch MSRP of $498. The i7-1375PRE has no launch MSRP listed in the data.

Q: Are these processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both are in the 59th percentile of all CPUs. Their average benchmark scores are close, with the i7-1375PRE at 4985 and the Xeon W-1290 at 4932.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is stark. The i7-1375PRE is built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node, while the Xeon W-1290 uses the older Comet Lake architecture on a 14 nm node. This generational gap affects nearly every aspect of the design. The i7-1375PRE’s die size is 217 mm², slightly larger than the Xeon’s 206 mm², but the newer process allows for more efficient transistor packing. The i7-1375PRE also has a different cache hierarchy: its L1 cache is 80 KB per core and L2 cache is 2 MB per core, versus 64 KB and 256 KB per core on the Xeon. The L3 cache is 24 MB shared on the i7-1375PRE versus 20 MB shared on the Xeon.

The i7-1375PRE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the Xeon W-1290 is limited to DDR4 only. The Xeon does have a listed memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, a figure not provided for the i7-1375PRE. The i7-1375PRE offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, whereas the Xeon W-1290 provides PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: the i7-1375PRE uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the Xeon W-1290 has the more basic Intel UHD Graphics P630. The release dates are separated by roughly two and a half years, with the Xeon launching in May 2020 and the i7-1375PRE in January 2023.

The Verdict

The benchmark data paints a clear picture: the Intel Core i7-1375PRE is the faster processor in every measured Cinebench workload. It wins all six head-to-head tests, with a 1.1% advantage in multi-core and a 1.1% to 1.2% edge in single-core. The i7-1375PRE achieves this with 14 cores and 20 threads, compared to the Xeon’s 10 cores and 20 threads. For users prioritizing raw performance, the i7-1375PRE is the choice. However, the Xeon W-1290 is not without merit. It supports ECC memory, a feature the i7-1375PRE lacks entirely. It also targets the server/workstation segment, while the i7-1375PRE is a mobile part. The Xeon’s higher 80 W TDP versus the i7-1375PRE’s 28 W TDP suggests it is designed for sustained loads, though the benchmark scores still favor the newer chip. The i7-1375PRE is for those who want maximum Cinebench performance and modern features like DDR5 and PCIe Gen 4. The Xeon W-1290 is for workstation builds that require ECC memory and are willing to accept slightly lower scores. The data does not support choosing the Xeon for performance reasons alone, as it loses every benchmark.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification category. The i7-1375PRE has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Xeon W-1290 has 10 cores and 20 threads. Base clock speeds differ significantly: the i7-1375PRE runs at 1900.00 MHz, while the Xeon W-1290 starts at 3200.00 MHz. Boost clocks are closer, with the i7-1375PRE reaching 4.80 GHz and the Xeon W-1290 hitting 5.20 GHz. Thermal design power is a major differentiator: the i7-1375PRE uses 28 W, while the Xeon W-1290 draws 80 W. The socket types are incompatible: the i7-1375PRE uses Intel BGA 1744, and the Xeon W-1290 uses Intel Socket 1200.

Process technology favors the i7-1375PRE at 10 nm versus the Xeon’s 14 nm. Die sizes are similar at 217 mm² and 206 mm². Cache configurations differ across all levels: L1 is 80 KB per core on the i7-1375PRE versus 64 KB per core on the Xeon, L2 is 2 MB per core versus 256 KB per core, and L3 is 24 MB shared versus 20 MB shared. Memory support diverges, with the i7-1375PRE accepting DDR4 and DDR5, while the Xeon W-1290 only supports DDR4. The Xeon has a listed memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, which is absent for the i7-1375PRE. ECC memory support is exclusive to the Xeon W-1290. PCIe capabilities also differ: the i7-1375PRE has Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the Xeon W-1290 has Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics range from Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on the i7-1375PRE to Intel UHD Graphics P630 on the Xeon. The market segments are distinct, mobile versus server/workstation. Part numbers are SRMRK for the i7-1375PRE and SRH94 for the Xeon W-1290. The Xeon W-1290 has a launch MSRP of $498, while the i7-1375PRE has none listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The i7-1375PRE sweeps the Cinebench suite, but the margins are tight. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7-1375PRE scores 1737 against the Xeon’s 1718, a 1.1% win. The single-core R15 test shows a 1.2% advantage, with scores of 245 and 242. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 7239 for the i7-1375PRE and 7162 for the Xeon, again a 1.1% delta. The single-core R20 test yields 1021 versus 1010, a 1.1% edge. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7-1375PRE posts 17236, while the Xeon W-1290 manages 17054, another 1.1% difference. The final test, Cinebench R23 single-core, shows the i7-1375PRE at 2433 and the Xeon at 2407, a 1.1% lead.

These results are notable because the Xeon W-1290 has a significantly higher base clock (3200 MHz versus 1900 MHz) and boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 4.80 GHz). Despite this clock advantage, the i7-1375PRE’s newer architecture and higher core count (14 versus 10) overcome the frequency deficit. The i7-1375PRE’s 28 W TDP makes this performance even more impressive, as it achieves these scores at a fraction of the Xeon’s 80 W power envelope. The average benchmark scores reflect this overall trend: the i7-1375PRE averages 4985, while the Xeon W-1290 averages 4932, a 1.1% gap. The nearest rival data places the i7-1375PRE within 0.1% of the Intel Core i5-12600HE and 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G. The Xeon W-1290 sits 1% below the Intel Core i5-12600HE and 0.9% above the Intel Xeon Gold 5315Y. In every direct comparison, the i7-1375PRE emerges victorious, though the Xeon W-1290 remains competitive given its older architecture and workstation focus.