Intel Core i7-1375PRE vs Intel Xeon E-2386G Comparison

The Intel Core i7-1375PRE and the Intel Xeon E-2386G occupy different corners of the processor market, one built for mobile efficiency and the other for workstation stability. Yet the benchmark database places them in a surprisingly close contest. Across six Cinebench tests, the Core i7-1375PRE wins every single round, but the margins are consistently narrow, ranging from 3.9% to 4.3%. This is not a rout; it is a pattern of small but decisive advantages.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most significant gap appears in the Cinebench R15 single-core test. The Core i7-1375PRE scores 245, while the Xeon E-2386G posts 235, a 4.3% advantage. That is the largest delta in the entire comparison. In every other test, the lead narrows to 3.9%. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Core i7 reaches 1737 against the Xeon's 1672. The R20 suite shows similar arithmetic: 7239 versus 6968 in multi-core, and 1021 versus 983 in single-core. The R23 results follow the same script, with the Core i7 at 17236 multi-core and 2433 single-core, compared to the Xeon's 16592 and 2342.

The consistency of these margins is notable. Six tests, six wins for the Core i7, with no test where the Xeon manages to flip the outcome. The largest single-core lead, 4.3%, suggests the Core i7 has a slight edge in lightly threaded workloads, while the 3.9% multi-core delta indicates that its higher core count does not translate into a dramatically larger throughput advantage. The Xeon's six cores and twelve threads are competitive with the Core i7's fourteen cores and twenty threads in these specific benchmarks, but they never surpass them.

Context from the broader database reinforces the closeness. The Core i7's average benchmark score is 4985, placing it at the 59th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12600HE with an average score of 4980, a 0.1% difference, and the Intel Xeon W-2150B at 4992, a 0.1% gap in the other direction. The Xeon E-2386G averages 4799, also at the 59th percentile, with its closest competitor being the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X at 4807, a 0.2% deficit. Both chips sit in the same percentile band, but the Core i7 carries a roughly 3.9% higher average score, aligning with the head-to-head deltas.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel blueprints. The Core i7-1375PRE is built on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-P mobile variant, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. The Xeon E-2386G belongs to the Rocket Lake-E family, using the older 14 nm node. This process gap does not directly explain the benchmark outcomes, but it informs power and thermal behavior. The Core i7 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Xeon draws 95 watts, a substantial difference that reflects the mobile versus server design goals.

Core and cache configurations differ sharply. The Core i7 packs 14 cores and 20 threads, with L1 cache at 80 KB per core, L2 at 2 MB per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The Xeon offers 6 cores and 12 threads, with the same 80 KB per-core L1 but a smaller 512 KB per-core L2 and only 12 MB of shared L3. Despite having less than half the cores and half the L3, the Xeon trails by only 3.9% in multi-core tests. The die sizes reflect the node difference: the Core i7 measures 217 mm², the Xeon 276 mm².

Memory support also diverges. The Core i7 accepts both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, while the Xeon is limited to DDR4 but lists a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Xeon supports ECC memory, a critical feature for server workloads, whereas the Core i7 does not. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Core i7 carries Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units, while the Xeon uses the more modest UHD Graphics P750.

The sockets are incompatible. The Core i7 uses Intel BGA 1744, a soldered mobile socket, while the Xeon fits Intel Socket 1200, a standard LGA desktop or entry-server socket. Both support PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, so expansion capability is equivalent. Release dates also vary, with the Core i7 launching on January 3, 2023, and the Xeon on September 7, 2021. The Core i7's part number is SRMRK, the Xeon's is SRKN0.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-1375PRE wins all three multi-core tests. It scores 1737 in Cinebench R15, 7239 in R20, and 17236 in R23. The Xeon E-2386G trails by 3.9% in each, with scores of 1672, 6968, and 16592 respectively.

Q: How do the single-core results compare?

A: The Core i7-1375PRE also leads in single-core tests. Its Cinebench R15 score is 245 versus 235 for the Xeon, a 4.3% gap. In R20, it scores 1021 against 983, and in R23, 2433 against 2342, both 3.9% advantages.

Q: Does the Xeon E-2386G support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Xeon E-2386G supports ECC memory. The Core i7-1375PRE does not support ECC. This is a notable differentiator for server or workstation reliability requirements.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each chip?

A: The Core i7-1375PRE has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Xeon E-2386G has 6 cores and 12 threads. Despite this, the Xeon remains close in benchmark scores, within 3.9% in multi-core tests.

Q: Are these processors from the same manufacturing node?

A: No. The Core i7-1375PRE uses Intel's 10 nm process, while the Xeon E-2386G uses the 14 nm node. The Core i7 also has a smaller die size at 217 mm² compared to the Xeon's 276 mm².

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Core i7-1375PRE has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Xeon E-2386G has a TDP of 95 watts. The Core i7 is designed for mobile efficiency, while the Xeon targets higher-power server environments.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights only the fields where the two processors differ, based on the recorded data.

| Specification | Intel Core i7-1375PRE | Intel Xeon E-2386G |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | None listed | Xeon E-2300 series |

| Cores | 14 | 6 |

| Threads | 20 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 1900.00 MHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 95 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Intel Socket 1200 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Rocket Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-P | Rocket Lake-E |

| Generation | Core i7 (Raptor Lake-P) | Xeon E (Rocket Lake-E) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |

| Die Size | 217 mm² | 276 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not listed | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | false | true |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | UHD Graphics P750 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2021-09-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $450 |

| Part Number | SRMRK | SRKN0 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 4985 | 4799 |

| Percentile | 59 | 59 |

The base and boost clocks favor the Xeon, which runs at 3.50 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost, against the Core i7's 1.90 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. The Xeon's higher clocks do not overcome the Core i7's core-count advantage in these tests. The L2 cache allocation is dramatically different, with the Core i7 offering 2 MB per core versus the Xeon's 512 KB per core. The Xeon's launch MSRP is listed as $450, while the Core i7 has no listed price in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear but narrow winner: the Intel Core i7-1375PRE. It wins all six head-to-head benchmarks, with no test going to the Xeon E-2386G. The margins, however, are small, never exceeding 4.3%. For users who prioritize pure Cinebench throughput, the Core i7 is the better performer. It achieves these results with a 28-watt TDP, making it far more power-efficient than the Xeon's 95-watt envelope, and it offers newer memory support with DDR5 compatibility.

The Xeon E-2386G, despite losing every benchmark, remains relevant for specific use cases. Its ECC memory support is a feature the Core i7 cannot offer, and its Socket 1200 platform is a conventional server or workstation installation, whereas the Core i7's BGA 1744 socket is soldered and mobile-oriented. The Xeon's higher base and boost clocks, 3.50 GHz and 5.10 GHz, indicate a design tuned for sustained single-thread response, even if the benchmark scores do not reflect a win.

The database places both chips at the 59th percentile of all CPUs, suggesting they deliver similar overall performance relative to the broader market. The Core i7's average score of 4985 sits 3.9% above the Xeon's 4799, which matches the head-to-head delta. The nearest rivals for each chip reinforce this positioning: the Core i7 trades blows with the Core i5-12600HE and Xeon W-2150B within 0.1% to 0.2%, while the Xeon E-2386G sits within 0.2% to 0.6% of the Ryzen 9 3950X, Core i5-1350P, Xeon W-1290E, and EPYC 7252.

For a mobile workstation or a compact system where power draw and DDR5 support matter, the Core i7-1375PRE is the measured choice. For a server environment where ECC memory is non-negotiable, the Xeon E-2386G holds the edge, even with its lower benchmark scores. The data does not crown an absolute champion; it presents two processors with different strengths, where the Core i7 wins on speed and efficiency, and the Xeon wins on platform features. Buyers should match the chip to their workload demands, not just the benchmark leaderboard.