Intel Core i7-13700TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225T Comparison

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T and Intel Core i7-13700TE are two power-leaning desktop processors that target different parts of the performance spectrum. The data shows a clear split: the Ultra 5 225T dominates in single-threaded and most compute-heavy workloads, while the i7-13700TE leverages its higher core count to win in specific integer and compression tasks. Both processors sit at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, but their average benchmark scores differ slightly, with the i7-13700TE posting a 31028 average against the Ultra 5 225T’s 30468. This head-to-head reveals that raw core counts do not always translate to overall superiority, especially when architectural efficiency comes into play.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the data is the Ultra 5 225T’s near-total sweep of the Cinebench suite. Across all six Cinebench tests—R15, R20, and R23, each in single-core and multi-core variants—the Ultra 5 225T wins with a consistent deltaPct of 17.5%. For instance, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ultra 5 225T scores 21971 against the i7-13700TE’s 18698. The single-core gap is equally decisive: 3101 versus 2639 in R23 single-core. This consistency suggests an architectural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk, as the same 17.5% delta appears in both R15 and R20 multi-core tests.

The Ultra 5 225T’s dominance extends into several Passmark subtests, where it posts some of its largest margins. The biggest win comes in Passmark find prime numbers, where the Ultra 5 225T scores 284 against the i7-13700TE’s 101, a 181.2% delta. Extended instructions show a 46.1% lead (20083 vs 13750), and physics tests reveal a 50.1% advantage (2053 vs 1368). Single-thread performance is also strongly in the Ultra 5 225T’s favor: 4348 versus 3422, a 27.1% delta. Data encryption shows a 21.9% lead (18289 vs 15006), and floating-point math comes in at 24.6% ahead (82751 vs 66421).

However, the i7-13700TE is not without its counterpoints. The largest win for the i7-13700TE is in Passmark integer math, where it scores 97911 versus the Ultra 5 225T’s 59543—a 39.2% delta in favor of the older chip. Data compression also goes to the i7-13700TE, with a score of 243565 against 233998, a 3.9% margin. These two wins highlight that the i7-13700TE’s extra six cores and fourteen threads can still be leveraged in specific parallel integer workloads. The multithread Passmark score also favors the Ultra 5 225T, but by a narrower 11.4% margin (25358 vs 22754), suggesting the i7-13700TE’s core advantage is partially offset by the Ultra 5 225T’s higher per-core efficiency.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is faster, scoring 21971 versus the i7-13700TE’s 18698, a 17.5% delta.

Q: Does the i7-13700TE ever win in any benchmark?

A: Yes. It wins in Passmark integer math (97911 vs 59543, a 39.2% delta) and Passmark data compression (243565 vs 233998, a 3.9% delta).

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in Passmark find prime numbers, where the Ultra 5 225T leads by 181.2% (284 vs 101).

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The i7-13700TE has a higher average benchmark score of 31028, while the Ultra 5 225T averages 30468. Both are in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Which CPU has better single-thread performance?

A: The Ultra 5 225T wins decisively, scoring 4348 in Passmark single-thread (and singlethread) versus the i7-13700TE’s 3422, a 27.1% delta.

Q: Are the Cinebench deltas consistent across versions?

A: Yes. The deltaPct is 17.5% for R15 multi-core, R20 multi-core, R23 multi-core, R15 single-core, R20 single-core, and R23 single-core, indicating a uniform performance differential.

Where Each One Wins

The Ultra 5 225T is the clear choice for workloads that rely on single-core speed and modern instruction sets. Its wins in Cinebench single-core tests (312 vs 265 in R15, 1302 vs 1108 in R20, 3101 vs 2639 in R23) make it suited for lightly-threaded applications like general desktop responsiveness, legacy software, and games that are not heavily multi-threaded. The data also shows strong performance in encryption (18289 vs 15006), extended instructions (20083 vs 13750), and physics (2053 vs 1368), which points to advantages in scientific simulation and cryptographic workloads. The 181.2% lead in prime number finding further reinforces its strength in integer-heavy mathematical tasks.

The i7-13700TE wins where raw thread count matters more than per-core speed. Its 39.2% lead in integer math and 3.9% lead in data compression indicate that it excels in batch processing, file archiving, and database operations that can utilize its 16 cores and 24 threads. The higher average benchmark score (31028 vs 30468) also suggests that, on a balanced mix of workloads, the i7-13700TE edges ahead overall. For users running heavily parallel integer workloads—such as video encoding with specific codecs or financial modeling—the i7-13700TE’s two wins could be more impactful than the Ultra 5 225T’s fifteen.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ substantially. The Ultra 5 225T has 10 cores and 10 threads, while the i7-13700TE has 16 cores and 24 threads. The Ultra 5 225T’s base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost of 4.90 GHz; the i7-13700TE lists a base clock of 1100.00 MHz (interpreted as 1.10 GHz) and a boost of 4.80 GHz. Thermal design power also diverges: the Ultra 5 225T is rated at 65W, while the i7-13700TE is rated at 35W. Sockets differ, with the Ultra 5 225T using Intel Socket 1851 and the i7-13700TE using Intel Socket 1700.

Cache configurations show a split between L2 and L3. The Ultra 5 225T has 192 KB of L1 per core and 3 MB of L2 per core, with 20 MB of shared L3. The i7-13700TE has 80 KB of L1 per core and 2 MB of L2 per core, with 30 MB of shared L3. Memory support differs: the Ultra 5 225T supports DDR5 only, while the i7-13700TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is only listed for the Ultra 5 225T at 102.4 GB/s. Integrated graphics differ as well: the Ultra 5 225T features Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU, while the i7-13700TE has UHD Graphics 770. Both CPUs have PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only) and neither supports ECC memory. The Ultra 5 225T was released later (2024-12-31) than the i7-13700TE (2023-01-03), and both are currently active in production.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and manufacturing processes. The Ultra 5 225T is built on Arrow Lake (Arrow Lake-S) using a 3 nm process from TSMC, with a transistor count of 17,800 million and a die size of 243 mm². The i7-13700TE is based on Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake-S) using a 10 nm process from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm² and no listed transistor count. The foundry difference is notable: TSMC for the Ultra 5 225T versus Intel for the i7-13700TE.

The L1 cache per core differs significantly: 192 KB per core for the Ultra 5 225T versus 80 KB per core for the i7-13700TE. L2 cache also differs, with the Ultra 5 225T offering 3 MB per core versus 2 MB per core for the i7-13700TE. However, the i7-13700TE compensates with a larger shared L3 cache of 30 MB versus 20 MB for the Ultra 5 225T. The integrated graphics units are different architectures as well: Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 16EU on the Ultra 5 225T versus UHD Graphics 770 on the i7-13700TE. The memory controllers also differ, with the Ultra 5 225T limited to DDR5 while the i7-13700TE retains support for DDR4, which may matter for platform compatibility.

The Verdict

The data directs different users to different chips. If the workload is dominated by single-thread performance, modern instruction sets, or floating-point math, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T is the definitive pick. Its 27.1% lead in single-thread Passmark, 46.1% lead in extended instructions, and 24.6% lead in floating-point math make it superior for interactive applications, compilation of single-threaded code, and simulation tasks. The consistent 17.5% Cinebench advantage across all versions reinforces that this is a broad architectural win, not a niche result.

The Intel Core i7-13700TE is the choice when integer-heavy parallel workloads dominate. Its 39.2% lead in integer math and 3.9% lead in data compression show clear strengths in file compression, database operations, and integer-heavy calculations. The higher average benchmark score (31028 vs 30468) suggests that, in a mixed workload environment, the i7-13700TE may offer slightly better overall throughput. Additionally, its 35W TDP versus the Ultra 5 225T’s 65W TDP makes it a better fit for power-constrained builds, even though the Ultra 5 225T has the higher boost clock. Users on existing LGA1700 platforms with DDR4 memory would also find the i7-13700TE more practical, given its memory support and socket compatibility. For new builds on LGA1851 with DDR5, the Ultra 5 225T provides superior per-core performance and broader benchmark dominance.