Intel Core i7-13700TE vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225H Comparison

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H and Intel Core i7-13700TE represent two distinct philosophies from the same manufacturer: one is a modern mobile-first design built on a leading-edge process, while the other is a desktop-oriented part with a higher core count. Benchmark data reveals a fascinating split, with the Ultra 5 225H dominating in many synthetic workloads, yet the i7-13700TE taking decisive wins in others. This analysis relies solely on the provided benchmark results, architecture details, and specification fields to determine which processor excels in which scenarios.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking takeaway from the head-to-head data is the sheer volume of wins for the Core Ultra 5 225H. Out of 17 benchmark comparisons, the Ultra 5 225H wins 14, while the i7-13700TE manages only 3. However, the magnitude of those 3 wins is significant, making this a nuanced battle rather than a rout.

The Core Ultra 5 225H’s biggest victories come in tests that stress the CPU’s modern architecture and instruction handling. In PassMark’s extended instructions test, the Ultra 5 225H posts a score of 21915, a staggering 59.4% ahead of the i7-13700TE’s 13750. This is a massive gap, indicating superior execution of complex, modern instruction sets. Similarly, the find prime numbers test shows a 117.8% advantage for the Ultra 5 225H (220 vs. 101), showcasing a massive lead in integer-heavy, single-threaded logic. The data encryption test also favors the Ultra 5 225H, scoring 21428 versus 15006, a 42.8% delta, suggesting that newer cryptographic instructions are significantly faster on the Arrow Lake architecture.

In multi-core rendering workloads, the results are contradictory. The Ultra 5 225H wins decisively in Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core tests. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the Ultra 5 225H scores 10041, which is 27.9% higher than the i7-13700TE’s 7853. The story flips dramatically in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the i7-13700TE scores 18698, beating the Ultra 5 225H’s 14629.5 by 21.8%. This suggests the R23 test is more sensitive to the i7-13700TE’s higher thread count (24 threads vs. 14 threads) and larger L3 cache.

The i7-13700TE’s other two wins are also notable. In PassMark integer math, it achieves 97911, a 30% advantage over the Ultra 5 225H’s 68520. This is a pure computation test where the i7-13700TE’s 16 physical cores and 24 threads allow it to process more integer operations in parallel. The single-core Cinebench R23 result also goes to the i7-13700TE, with a score of 2639 versus 1969, a 25.4% lead. This is surprising given the Ultra 5 225H’s higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz compared to 4.80 GHz, but the data clearly shows the i7-13700TE has the stronger single-core performance in this specific benchmark.

Where Each One Wins

The Core Ultra 5 225H is the clear winner for tasks involving data compression, encryption, and floating-point math. Its PassMark data compression score of 283451 is 16.4% higher than the i7-13700TE’s 243565. For floating-point math, the Ultra 5 225H scores 86540, a 30.3% improvement over the i7-13700TE’s 66421. The physics test also favors the Ultra 5 225H, with a 37.2% lead (1877 vs. 1368), indicating better performance in simulation and physics calculations. These results paint a picture of a processor that is more efficient per thread and better at handling complex, modern workloads.

The i7-13700TE, on the other hand, is the winner when raw thread count and cache size matter most. Its 30 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to the Ultra 5 225H’s 18 MB, likely contributes to its strong Cinebench R23 multi-core performance. The 30% win in integer math and the 25.4% win in Cinebench R23 single-core show that for certain workloads, the Raptor Lake architecture still holds a significant edge. If a user’s primary applications are heavily dependent on integer operations or specific rendering engines that favor the R23 test, the i7-13700TE is the better choice.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and manufacturing processes. The Core Ultra 5 225H is part of the Core Ultra Series 2, using the Arrow Lake architecture on a 3 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The Core i7-13700TE is from the Core 13th Gen series, using the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. This process difference is a key factor in the performance deltas, with the smaller 3 nm node allowing for greater power efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds per watt.

The core configurations also differ significantly. The Ultra 5 225H has 14 cores and 14 threads, indicating it does not support Hyper-Threading, while the i7-13700TE has 16 cores and 24 threads, which implies a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores, with the efficiency cores supporting multi-threading. The cache hierarchies are also distinct. The Ultra 5 225H has a larger L1 cache at 192 KB per core and L2 at 3 MB per core, but a smaller shared L3 at 18 MB. The i7-13700TE has 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core, but a much larger 30 MB shared L3.

The integrated graphics differ, with the Ultra 5 225H featuring Arc Graphics 130T, while the i7-13700TE has UHD Graphics 770. The PCIe support also differs, with the Ultra 5 225H offering Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while the i7-13700TE offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes. This makes the i7-13700TE more suitable for systems with multiple high-bandwidth expansion cards.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ across several specification fields, reflecting their different target markets. The Core Ultra 5 225H is a mobile processor with a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. It has a TDP of 28 watts and uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket. The Core i7-13700TE is a desktop processor with a base clock of 1100.00 MHz (1.10 GHz) and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its TDP is 35 watts and it uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support also differs. The Ultra 5 225H supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s. The i7-13700TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is listed for it. The process node and die size differ as well, with the Ultra 5 225H on a 3 nm node and the i7-13700TE on a 10 nm node with a die size of 257 mm². The i7-13700TE also has a different part number (SRMG4) compared to the Ultra 5 225H (SRQAM).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i7-13700TE’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE has 24 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H has 14 threads.

Q: Which processor is better at data encryption?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H is significantly better, scoring 21428 in PassMark data encryption, which is 42.8% higher than the Intel Core i7-13700TE’s score of 15006.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Core i7-13700TE have its biggest victory?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE’s biggest victory is in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 18698, beating the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H’s 14629.5 by 21.8%.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE has a larger shared L3 cache of 30 MB, compared to the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H’s 18 MB.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X.