Intel Core i7-13700T vs Intel Core i7-13800H Comparison

The Intel Core i7-13700T and Intel Core i7-13800H are both 13th Gen Raptor Lake parts, but they target completely different platforms: one is a low-power desktop chip, the other a high-performance mobile processor. The benchmark data shows a decisive overall victory for the desktop part, which wins 16 out of 17 head-to-head tests. The i7-13700T dominates in nearly every compute category, while the mobile i7-13800H manages only a single win in a physics simulation test. This is a case where the desktop chip’s higher core count and larger cache overwhelm the mobile chip’s higher boost clock, making the 13700T the clear choice for raw performance in a stationary system.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the data is the consistency of the i7-13700T’s lead across all Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 13700T scores 23248 against the 13800H’s 18358, a 26.6% advantage. The single-core R23 result is equally lopsided: 3282 versus 2591, also a 26.7% gap. This trend repeats across every Cinebench version, with the 13700T leading by 26.4% to 26.7% in both single-core and multi-core tests. The desktop chip’s 16 cores and 24 threads simply outmuscle the mobile chip’s 14 cores and 20 threads in sustained multi-threaded workloads.

Moving to PassMark tests, the 13700T’s wins are narrower but still consistent. In integer math, it scores 105397 against 92589, a 13.8% lead. Floating point math shows an 11% advantage (73928 vs 66579). The gap shrinks in data compression (327700 vs 299179, 9.5%) and data encryption (19230 vs 17726, 8.5%). The smallest wins come in multi-thread (28211 vs 26545, 6.3%) and random string sorting (34939 vs 33188, 5.3%). Even in single-thread performance, where the 13800H’s 5.20 GHz boost clock should help, the 13700T wins by 7.8% (3821 vs 3543). The only test the 13800H wins is PassMark physics, scoring 1924 against 1769, an 8.1% advantage for the mobile chip.

The data suggests the 13700T’s 30 MB of L3 cache and extra cores provide a substantial advantage in most workloads, while the 13800H’s higher base clock (2.50 GHz vs 1.40 GHz) helps in the specific physics test. Overall, the 13700T’s average benchmark score is 35403, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the 13800H sits at 34988 and the 84th percentile. The 13700T’s nearest rival is the Intel Core 5 213PE, which scores 35428, just 0.1% higher, while the 13800H’s closest competitor is the Intel Core i9-12900HX, which scores 35003, essentially a tie.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700T has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i7-13800H has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Does the mobile chip have a higher boost clock?

A: Yes, the i7-13800H boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the i7-13700T boosts to 4.90 GHz. Despite this, the 13700T wins in single-core Cinebench R23 by 26.7%.

Q: What is the single benchmark where the i7-13800H wins?

A: The i7-13800H wins the PassMark physics test, scoring 1924 versus 1769 for the i7-13700T, an 8.1% difference.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The i7-13700T has an average benchmark score of 35403, while the i7-13800H scores 34988. The 13700T ranks at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, the 13800H at the 84th.

Q: What are their launch MSRPs?

A: The i7-13700T has a launch MSRP of $384, and the i7-13800H has a launch MSRP of $457.

Q: Which chip has larger L3 cache?

A: The i7-13700T has 30 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i7-13800H has 24 MB.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-13700T is the faster processor in nearly every measurable way. It wins 16 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, including all Cinebench tests by margins of 26% or more. For anyone building a desktop system where power consumption is a secondary concern, the 13700T delivers superior multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The only reason to pick the i7-13800H is if you need a mobile processor and the physics simulation performance matters more than everything else—but that single win is not enough to offset the 13700T’s dominance elsewhere. The 13800H’s higher boost clock does not translate into better real-world scores, and its lower core count and smaller cache hold it back. If performance is the goal, the 13700T is the clear winner.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several fundamental specifications. The i7-13700T is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700, while the i7-13800H is a mobile part on Intel BGA 1744. The 13700T has 16 cores and 24 threads, compared to 14 cores and 20 threads on the 13800H. Base clocks differ significantly: the 13700T runs at 1.40 GHz, the 13800H at 2.50 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with the 13800H at 5.20 GHz and the 13700T at 4.90 GHz. The TDP is 35W for the desktop chip and 45W for the mobile chip. The 13700T has 30 MB of L3 cache, while the 13800H has 24 MB. The 13700T supports 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), while the 13800H supports 8 lanes. The desktop chip uses UHD Graphics 770, the mobile chip uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The 13700T has an unlocked multiplier, the 13800H does not. The 13800H has a part number SRMJ2. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and neither supports ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process, with the same die size of 257 mm². The key architectural difference is the core configuration. The i7-13700T is a Raptor Lake-S desktop variant, while the i7-13800H is a Raptor Lake-H mobile variant. The desktop chip has two more cores and four more threads, which directly explains its multi-threaded performance advantage. The 13700T also has 6 MB more L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB), which helps with data-heavy workloads. Both have the same L1 and L2 cache per core: 80 KB and 2 MB respectively. The integrated graphics differ, with the 13700T using UHD Graphics 770 and the 13800H using Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The memory controllers are identical, supporting the same DDR4/DDR5 dual-channel configurations. The 13700T offers significantly more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8), which matters for desktop expansion.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-13700T wins in all multi-threaded and single-threaded compute benchmarks, including Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both modes. It also wins in PassMark integer math, floating point math, data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, multi-thread, random string sorting, and single-thread tests. This makes it the better choice for rendering, video encoding, scientific computing, and general productivity. The 13700T’s 30 MB L3 cache and 16 cores give it a clear edge in workloads that scale with core count and cache size.

The i7-13800H wins only in PassMark physics, scoring 1924 versus 1769. This suggests it has a specific advantage in physics simulation tasks, possibly due to its higher base clock of 2.50 GHz. For mobile users who prioritize physics-based workloads, such as certain simulation or gaming physics, the 13800H has a niche edge. However, this single win is dwarfed by the 13700T’s 16 wins. The 13800H is also the only option for laptop users, as the 13700T requires a desktop socket. If you need a processor for a laptop and physics performance is critical, the 13800H is the pick, but for any other workload, the data points to the 13700T.