AMD Ryzen 5 150 vs Intel Core i7-13700T Comparison

The Intel Core i7-13700T and AMD Ryzen 5 150 occupy very different corners of the processor market, yet both share a 35 W thermal design point. The database places the Intel part at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD chip sits at the 84th percentile, which means these are close in overall standing despite a significant gap in core counts and architecture. The Intel processor is a 16-core, 24-thread desktop part built on Intel’s 10 nm process, while the AMD processor is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile part built on TSMC’s 6 nm node. Their average benchmark scores, 35403 for the Intel and 34881 for the AMD, are separated by only about 1.5%, but the head-to-head results tell a different story, with the Intel part winning all 11 recorded comparisons.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700T has 16 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds?

A: The Intel part runs at a 1400 MHz base clock and boosts to 4900 MHz. The AMD part runs at a 3300 MHz base clock and boosts to 4550 MHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700T scores 3821 in PassMark single-thread, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 scores 3155. The Intel part leads by 21.1%.

Q: Do both processors support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, both support DDR5. The Intel part also supports DDR4, while the AMD part supports only DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700T has 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Are both processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-13700T has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 does not.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i7-13700T is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die, and uses Intel’s 10 nm process. It is a desktop part that fits into Intel Socket 1700. The AMD Ryzen 5 150 uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC, and mounts into AMD Socket FP7, which is a mobile platform. The process node difference is notable: Intel’s 10 nm versus TSMC’s 6 nm, with the AMD die being smaller at 210 mm² compared to Intel’s 257 mm².

Cache structures differ significantly. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This means the Intel processor has substantially more cache at every level, which helps with data-heavy workloads. The memory support also differs: Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, while AMD supports only DDR5. The AMD part does have a listed memory bandwidth figure of 76.8 GB/s, which is not provided for the Intel chip.

PCIe support is another split. The Intel Core i7-13700T offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 offers PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ as well: Intel uses UHD Graphics 770, while AMD uses Radeon 660M. The Intel part was released in January 2023 and carries a launch MSRP of $384. The AMD part was released in September 2025, and no launch MSRP is recorded in the database. Both processors have ECC memory support set to false.

The Intel processor is marked as a desktop market segment part, while the AMD processor is marked as mobile. This distinction matters for system builders because it affects the platform, cooling, and power delivery expectations. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, which allows overclocking, whereas the AMD part is locked. The production status for both is active.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head comparisons cover 11 PassMark tests, and the Intel Core i7-13700T wins every single one. The largest margin comes in the find prime numbers test, where Intel scores 127 versus AMD’s 47, a massive 170.2% advantage. This test is heavily dependent on integer arithmetic and core count, and the Intel part’s 16 cores and 24 threads dominate the AMD’s 6 cores and 12 threads.

Floating point math shows a similar gap. Intel scores 73928, while AMD scores 35118, giving Intel a 110.5% lead. Physics simulation follows the same pattern: Intel scores 1769, AMD scores 806, a 119.5% difference. These three tests, prime numbers, floating point, and physics, are all multi-threaded workloads where core count matters most, and the Intel part has more than double the cores.

In integer math, Intel scores 105397 versus AMD’s 62151, a 69.6% lead. Multithread performance shows Intel at 28211 and AMD at 17492, a 61.3% difference. Data compression results are also lopsided: Intel scores 327700, AMD scores 211289, a 55.1% lead. Random string sorting gives Intel 34939 and AMD 22382, a 56.1% difference. Data encryption shows Intel at 19230 and AMD at 13425, a 43.2% lead.

Extended instructions, which test SIMD and vector workloads, show Intel at 19306 versus AMD at 14675, a 31.6% advantage. The closest contest is in single-thread performance, where Intel scores 3821 and AMD scores 3155, a 21.1% lead. Even in this narrowest margin, the Intel part is clearly ahead. The overall win count is 11 for Intel and 0 for AMD.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i7-13700T has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 150 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 1400 MHz for Intel and 3300 MHz for AMD, which means the AMD chip starts at a much higher frequency but the Intel chip boosts higher to 4900 MHz versus 4550 MHz. The TDP is identical at 35 W for both, which is a notable point of comparison because the Intel part delivers far more performance at the same power envelope.

Sockets are completely different: Intel uses Socket 1700, AMD uses Socket FP7. The architectures are Raptor Lake for Intel and Zen 3+ for AMD. Process nodes are 10 nm for Intel and 6 nm for AMD. Die sizes are 257 mm² for Intel and 210 mm² for AMD. Cache hierarchy differs at every level: L1 is 80 KB per core for Intel versus 64 KB per core for AMD, L2 is 2 MB per core for Intel versus 512 KB per core for AMD, and L3 is 30 MB shared for Intel versus 16 MB shared for AMD.

Memory support shows Intel offering both DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports only DDR5. Memory bus is dual-channel for both. The AMD part has a specified memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while no such figure is listed for the Intel part. PCIe generation differs: Intel has Gen 5, AMD has Gen 4, both with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770 for Intel and Radeon 660M for AMD. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD part is locked. Market segments are desktop for Intel and mobile for AMD. Release dates are January 2023 for Intel and September 2025 for AMD. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD part has none recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13700T wins every recorded benchmark comparison, so the case for the AMD Ryzen 5 150 is not based on measured performance but on platform fit and specific workload characteristics. The AMD part has a higher base clock, 3300 MHz versus 1400 MHz, which can help in short bursts of lightly threaded work where the processor does not need to ramp up. Its smaller 210 mm² die and 6 nm process from TSMC may offer efficiency advantages in mobile scenarios, though the TDP is identical at 35 W.

The Intel part is the clear choice for multi-threaded productivity. Its 61.3% lead in multithread performance, 69.6% lead in integer math, and 110.5% lead in floating point math make it suitable for rendering, simulation, and scientific computing. The 170.2% lead in prime number finding indicates strong raw integer throughput. The 43.2% lead in data encryption and 55.1% lead in data compression show that archival and security workloads will run noticeably faster on the Intel chip.

For single-threaded tasks, the Intel part still leads by 21.1% in the PassMark single-thread test. This covers typical desktop responsiveness, web browsing, and office applications. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock at 4900 MHz versus 4550 MHz, which aligns with that lead. The AMD part’s higher base clock does not translate into a benchmark win anywhere in the recorded data.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 may appeal to builders who need a mobile platform with an integrated Radeon 660M GPU, which could be more capable for light gaming than Intel’s UHD Graphics 770, though no graphics benchmarks are recorded in the database to confirm this. The AMD part’s support for PCIe Gen 4 may be sufficient for many users, while the Intel part’s PCIe Gen 5 provides more headroom for future storage and expansion. The AMD part also has a smaller die, which might be relevant for compact mobile designs.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core i7-13700T is the superior processor in every measured category. It wins all 11 head-to-head benchmarks, with margins ranging from 21.1% in single-thread to 170.2% in prime number finding. Its average benchmark score of 35403 is higher than the AMD’s 34881, and its percentile ranking of 85 is one point higher. The Intel part offers more cores, more threads, more cache at every level, a higher boost clock, PCIe Gen 5, and an unlocked multiplier. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5, which gives system builders more memory options.

The AMD Ryzen 5 150 is not without merit, but its strengths are not reflected in the benchmark data. It has a higher base clock, a smaller die, and a more advanced 6 nm process from TSMC. It is a mobile part, so it may be the only option in certain laptop or compact system designs. Its Radeon 660M integrated graphics could be a deciding factor for buyers who do not plan to use a discrete GPU, but no graphics performance numbers are available in the database to support a direct comparison.

For a desktop builder choosing between these two, the Intel Core i7-13700T is the clear pick. The 61.3% multithread advantage and 21.1% single-thread advantage mean it will be faster in nearly every application. The fact that both parts share a 35 W TDP makes the Intel victory even more meaningful, as it achieves this performance without drawing more power according to the specifications. The AMD part may be relevant for mobile systems where the Socket FP7 platform is required, but for raw CPU performance, the data does not support choosing it over the Intel part. The verdict is straightforward: the Intel Core i7-13700T wins on every recorded metric, and the AMD Ryzen 5 150 only makes sense in a mobile context where its platform and integrated graphics are required.