AMD Ryzen 9 5900 vs Intel Core i7-13700KF Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen 9 5900

CORE STATE Vermeer
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 4.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 3
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-13700KF

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-S
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 30 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,906
3,901
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
410
550
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
12,110
16,255
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,709
2,294
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
28,834
38,704
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
4,070
5,464
passmark_data_compression
411,453
596,493
passmark_data_encryption
26,247
33,314
passmark_extended_instructions
26,859
36,700
passmark_find_prime_numbers
213
186
passmark_floating_point_math
69,124
114,997
passmark_integer_math
128,641
154,507
passmark_multithread
33,969
45,817
passmark_physics
1,697
2,650
passmark_random_string_sorting
43,386
62,726
passmark_single_thread
3,439
4,336
passmark_singlethread
3,439
4,336
3dmark_16_threads
N/A
10,749
3dmark_2_threads
N/A
2,263
3dmark_4_threads
N/A
4,474
3dmark_8_threads
N/A
8,230
3dmark_max_threads
N/A
12,462
3dmark_single_thread
N/A
1,137
geekbench_multicore
N/A
18,258
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,435

Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 5900 vs Intel Core i7-13700KF

The Intel Core i7-13700KF and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 are both desktop processors aimed at high-performance users, but they represent fundamentally different design eras. The benchmark data shows a decisive performance advantage for the Intel part, which wins 16 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons. The Intel Core i7-13700KF achieves an average benchmark score of 47330, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 posts an average score of 46971, also in the 89th percentile. The overall picture is one of generational improvement, with the newer Intel architecture delivering superior results across nearly every workload category.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the head-to-head data is the consistency of the Intel Core i7-13700KF's victories. Across the entire Cinebench suite, the Intel processor maintains a remarkably uniform lead of roughly 34%. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7-13700KF scores 38704 against the Ryzen 9 5900's 28834, a delta of 34.2%. The single-core results tell the same story: 5464 versus 4070 in Cinebench R23 single-core, a 34.3% advantage for Intel. This uniformity suggests the performance gap is architectural rather than workload-specific, stemming from the Intel chip's higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz compared to the AMD's 4.70 GHz.

The PassMark suite reveals where the Intel processor's lead becomes even more pronounced. The largest margin comes in floating-point math, where the i7-13700KF scores 114997 against the Ryzen 9 5900's 69124 — a massive 66.4% advantage. Physics performance also shows a substantial gap: 2650 versus 1697, a 56.2% delta in Intel's favor. These large margins indicate the Intel part has a significant throughput advantage in heavily parallel, compute-intensive operations. Data compression also favors Intel heavily, with scores of 596493 versus 411453, a 45% difference.

The Intel processor wins the remaining tests by margins ranging from 20.1% to 44.6%. Integer math shows a 20.1% advantage (154507 versus 128641), while data encryption is 26.9% ahead (33314 versus 26247). Random string sorting is 44.6% faster (62726 versus 43386), and extended instructions are 36.6% ahead (36700 versus 26859). The PassMark multi-thread test shows a 34.9% lead (45817 versus 33969), and the single-thread test shows a 26.1% advantage (4336 versus 3439).

The only benchmark where the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 comes out ahead is find prime numbers, where it scores 213 versus Intel's 186. That represents a 12.7% advantage for AMD. This is an interesting outlier, suggesting the Zen 3 architecture has a specific strength in this particular integer workload, despite losing the broader integer math test by 20.1%. It is a narrow but genuine victory for the AMD part.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13700KF is the clear choice for compute-heavy workloads. Its wins span rendering, physics simulation, cryptography, compression, and general multi-threaded productivity. The 34.2% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core makes it the stronger option for 3D rendering and video encoding. The 56.2% advantage in PassMark physics indicates superior performance in simulation and gaming physics calculations. Data compression and encryption workloads, common in file archiving and database operations, are also firmly in Intel's favor with a 45% and 26.9% lead, respectively.

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900's sole win in prime number finding points to a very specific niche. Prime number calculations are a common benchmark for mathematical computing and cryptography. While the AMD processor loses the broader integer math test, its 12.7% advantage in this focused workload suggests that software heavily reliant on prime number generation might see a benefit. The data does not support any broader claim of AMD superiority in general number crunching, as Intel leads integer math by 20.1%.

For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput, the Intel part is the default recommendation. The data shows a 34.9% lead in PassMark multi-thread and a 34.2% lead in Cinebench R20 multi-core. The AMD processor's 12 cores and 24 threads match Intel's 16 cores and 24 threads in thread count, but the Intel architecture extracts more performance from those threads. The single-thread performance gap is also decisive, with Intel leading by 26.1% in PassMark single-thread and 34.3% in Cinebench R23 single-core, making Intel the better choice for lightly-threaded applications and general responsiveness.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is stark. The Intel Core i7-13700KF is built on Raptor Lake-S architecture using a 10 nm process node manufactured by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 uses Zen 3 architecture, codenamed Vermeer, on a 7 nm process from TSMC, with a dual-die design measuring 2x 74 mm² and containing 8,300 million transistors. The Intel chip has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD chip has 12 cores and 24 threads. Both have unlocked multipliers, but the core count difference is significant.

Cache configuration differs substantially. The Intel processor uses a per-core L1 cache of 80 KB and a per-core L2 cache of 2 MB, with 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD processor has a smaller per-core L1 cache of 64 KB and a per-core L2 cache of 512 KB, but compensates with a much larger 64 MB L3 cache. This cache hierarchy difference explains part of the performance gap; Intel's larger per-core L2 cache likely benefits its higher clock speeds.

Memory support is another key differentiator. The Intel Core i7-13700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 is limited to DDR4 only, also dual-channel. The AMD part has a specified memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the Intel part does not list a bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory. The Intel processor features PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Neither processor includes integrated graphics.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The most obvious is core count: Intel has 16 cores versus AMD's 12. Thread counts are equal at 24. Clock speeds favor Intel, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz versus 3.00 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus 4.70 GHz. Thermal design power differs substantially: the Intel part has a 125 W TDP, while the AMD part has a 65 W TDP. This indicates the Intel processor requires more robust cooling.

Socket compatibility is entirely different. The Intel Core i7-13700KF uses Intel Socket 1700, while the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 uses AMD Socket AM4. This means they are not interchangeable in any motherboard. The process node also differs, with Intel at 10 nm and AMD at 7 nm, though Intel's is an Intel foundry process and AMD's is TSMC. The release dates show Intel is newer, launched on 2022-09-26, while AMD launched on 2021-01-11. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD part has no listed launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Intel Core i7-13700KF in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel processor leads by 34.2% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (38704 versus 28834) and by 34.9% in PassMark multi-thread (45817 versus 33969). These are the primary multi-core metrics in the data.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the AMD processor wins the PassMark find prime numbers test with a score of 213 versus Intel's 186, a 12.7% advantage. This is the only head-to-head test it wins out of 17 total comparisons.

Q: What is the difference in single-thread performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF leads in all single-thread tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 5464 versus 4070, a 34.3% advantage. In PassMark single-thread, it scores 4336 versus 3439, a 26.1% lead.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-13700KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 supports only DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and both support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF has 16 cores and 24 threads. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The thread counts are equal, but Intel has four more physical cores.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Intel processor's base clock is 3.40 GHz, and the AMD processor's base clock is 3.00 GHz.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
9 5900
i7-13700KF
Core Specs
Cores
12
16 +33.3%
Threads
24
24 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3
3.4 +13.3%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.7
5.4 +14.9%
Frequency (GHz)
3
3.4 +13.3%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.7
5.4 +14.9%
Multiplier
30
34 +13.3%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB
30 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
125 +92.3%
PL1
—
253 W
PL2
—
253 W
PPT
88 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 3
Raptor Lake
Codename
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-S
Generation
Ryzen 9 (Zen 3 (Vermeer))
Core i7 (Raptor Lake)
Process Size
7 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,300 million
—
Die Size
2x 74 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM4
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
AMD 300 Series*, AMD 400 Series, AMD 500 Series
H610, B660, H670, Q670, Z690, W680, B760, H770, Z790
PCIe
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
—
2.5 GHz up to 4.2 GHz
P-Core Turbo
—
5.3 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
12 nm
—
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$384
Part Number
100-000000062
SRMB9
Package
µOPGA-1331
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
—
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
—
View Ryzen 9 5900 Details View Core i7-13700KF Details