Intel Core i7-13700H vs Intel Core i7-1370P Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-1370P reaches a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-13700H tops out at 5.00 GHz. The recorded data shows the 1370P has the higher peak frequency.

Q: Do both chips use the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both the Core i7-13700H and Core i7-1370P feature 14 cores and 20 threads. The core and thread counts are identical in the database.

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core i7-1370P wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core with a score of 16365, which is 5.4% ahead of the Core i7-13700H's score of 15474.

Q: How does the 13700H compare in data compression workloads?

A: The Core i7-13700H scores 307791 in Passmark data compression, which is 41.4% higher than the 1370P's 217676. This is one of the larger gaps recorded between the two.

Q: Are the integrated graphics identical?

A: Yes, both processors include Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The integrated graphics solution is the same for both.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Core i7-13700H has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Core i7-1370P is rated at 28 watts. The 1370P is designed for a lower power envelope.

Architecture Differences

Both processors belong to Intel's Raptor Lake family, but they come from different sub-series. The Core i7-13700H is part of the Raptor Lake-H lineup, while the Core i7-1370P belongs to Raptor Lake-P. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process node and manufactured by Intel. The die size is recorded only for the 1370P at 217 mm², with no die size listed for the 13700H.

The cache structures are identical in the database: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. Neither chip supports ECC memory, and both run on a dual-channel memory bus with support for DDR4 and DDR5. The two chips share the same Intel BGA 1744 socket, the same integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU), and the same mobile market segment designation.

A key architectural difference appears in the PCIe implementation. The 13700H uses Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the 1370P uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). This is a meaningful platform-level distinction: the H-series part has access to the newer PCIe generation, but the P-series part offers more total lanes. For devices that rely on high-bandwidth expansion, the 1370P's additional lanes could matter, whereas the 13700H's Gen 5 support points toward higher per-lane bandwidth potential.

The base clocks diverge sharply. The 13700H has a base clock of 2.40 GHz, while the 1370P lists a base clock of 1900.00 MHz. Interestingly, the boost clocks tell a different story: the 1370P boosts to 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the 13700H's 5.00 GHz. The TDP difference is substantial as well, with the 13700H rated at 45 watts versus the 1370P's 28 watts. This suggests the 13700H is intended for thicker, higher-performance laptops, while the 1370P targets thinner designs that need to manage heat more carefully. The release dates are the same (2023-01-03), and both parts are still listed as active in production.

Where Each One Wins

The Core i7-13700H dominates the head-to-head results, winning 15 of the 17 recorded benchmarks. Its advantages are especially pronounced in multi-threaded and throughput-oriented workloads. Data compression shows a 41.4% lead, extended instructions show a 42.7% lead, and random string sorting shows a 42.5% lead. These are workloads that scale with sustained power delivery and core utilization, which aligns with the 13700H's higher 45-watt TDP.

The 13700H also wins in Cinebench R15 and R20, both multi-core and single-core. In R15 multi-core, it scores 2496 versus 1649, a 51.4% gap. In R20, the lead is 34.3% in both multi-core and single-core. The Passmark suite shows similar patterns: multithread score is 30% higher, integer math is 18% higher, and floating point math is 22.6% higher. Even the closest Passmark result, single-thread, goes to the 13700H at 3594 versus 3557, a 1% edge.

The Core i7-1370P wins the two remaining benchmarks, and both are notable for different reasons. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 1370P scores 16365, which is 5.4% higher than the 13700H's 15474. This is the only multi-threaded test where the lower-TDP chip comes out ahead, which is surprising given the 13700H's dominance elsewhere. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the 1370P scores 2310, a 19.7% lead over the 13700H's 1856. This is the largest single-core gap in either direction across the entire test set.

The pattern suggests the 1370P's higher boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 5.00 GHz) gives it an edge in lightly threaded and certain optimized workloads, while the 13700H's higher sustained power budget pays off in heavier, multi-threaded tasks. The R23 results complicate the narrative, however, as the 1370P wins the latest Cinebench multi-core test despite losing the older R15 and R20 versions.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded specifications. The base clock is one of the most striking differences: the 13700H runs at 2.40 GHz, while the 1370P is listed at 1900.00 MHz. The boost clock favors the 1370P at 5.20 GHz versus 5.00 GHz for the 13700H.

TDP is another major differentiator. The 13700H is rated at 45 watts, while the 1370P is rated at 28 watts. This 17-watt gap likely explains much of the performance behavior seen in the benchmarks.

The die size is recorded only for the 1370P at 217 mm²; no die size is listed for the 13700H. The PCIe configuration differs as well: the 13700H uses Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the 1370P uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

The launch MSRP differs: the 13700H has a launch MSRP of $502, while the 1370P has a launch MSRP of $438.

The part numbers are different: SRMJ1 for the 13700H and SRMJ6 for the 1370P. The codenames also differ, with Raptor Lake-H for the 13700H and Raptor Lake-P for the 1370P.

All other recorded specifications are identical: 14 cores, 20 threads, 10 nm process, 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, 24 MB shared L3, DDR4/DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory bus, no ECC, Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, mobile market segment, active production status, and a locked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single win for the Core i7-13700H comes in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where it scores 2496 against the 1370P's 1649. That is a 51.4% advantage, the biggest delta in the entire head-to-head set. The same test in single-core shows a 15.9% lead (269 versus 232), which is more modest but still clear.

Cinebench R20 shows a consistent 34.3% lead for the 13700H in both multi-core (9231 versus 6873) and single-core (1303 versus 970). These results reinforce the idea that the 13700H's higher power envelope translates into better sustained performance in older Cinebench versions.

The Passmark suite gives the 13700H several decisive wins. Data compression is 41.4% higher (307791 versus 217676). Extended instructions are 42.7% higher (18303 versus 12822). Random string sorting is 42.5% higher (33595 versus 23580). Data encryption is 37.5% higher (17971 versus 13067). These are large, consistent margins across very different workload types.

The 13700H also leads in Passmark multithread with a 30% gap (26399 versus 20303), in floating point math with 22.6% (66322 versus 54105), and in integer math with 18% (92811 versus 78675). Physics shows a 17.7% lead (1725 versus 1466), and find prime numbers shows a narrower 6.2% edge (103 versus 97). The smallest margin is in Passmark single-thread, where the 13700H scores 3594 versus 3557, a 1% difference.

The Core i7-1370P's wins are concentrated in Cinebench R23. In multi-core, it scores 16365 versus 15474, a 5.4% lead. In single-core, it scores 2310 versus 1856, a 19.7% lead. The single-core margin here is particularly striking because it is the largest single-core gap in either direction across all tests, and it flips the expected trend from R15 and R20, where the 13700H held the single-core advantage.

The overall scoreboard is 15 wins for the 13700H and 2 wins for the 1370P. The average benchmark scores reflect this: the 13700H averages 27355, while the 1370P averages 26900. Both sit at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, meaning they are statistically close in overall standing despite the lopsided head-to-head count.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split in use cases. The Core i7-13700H is the stronger choice for anyone whose workloads lean on multi-threaded throughput. Its 51.4% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 41.4% lead in data compression, and 30% lead in Passmark multithread show that it can sustain heavy parallel workloads better than the 1370P. The 45-watt TDP and 2.40 GHz base clock support this interpretation. For content creation, data processing, or any task that keeps all cores busy for extended periods, the 13700H has the measurable advantage.

The Core i7-1370P is the better pick for workloads that favor high boost clocks and lower power draw. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock likely explains its 19.7% single-core win in Cinebench R23 and its 5.4% multi-core win in the same test. The 28-watt TDP also makes it a more suitable option for thinner laptops where thermal headroom is limited. If the priority is short bursts of single-threaded performance or battery-conscious operation, the 1370P is the data-backed choice.

The average benchmark scores tell a slightly different story than the head-to-head count. The 13700H averages 27355, just 1.7% above the 1370P's 26900. Both processors sit at the 79th percentile, and their nearest rivals include a mix of AMD and Intel parts with very small deltas. The 13700H's closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G at 27382 (0.1% higher), while the 1370P's closest rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 at 26936 (0.1% higher). In overall terms, these two chips are far closer than the 15-2 win count implies.

The verdict depends on workload priority. Buyers who need sustained multi-threaded performance should look at the 13700H, as it wins the majority of the heavy throughput tests by wide margins. Buyers who value single-thread speed and efficiency, or who need a chip that fits a slimmer chassis, should consider the 1370P, especially given its R23 results and lower TDP. The recorded data does not support a universal winner; it supports two different optimizations for two different design goals.