Intel Core i7-1365UE vs Intel Core i7-9750HF Comparison

The Intel Core i7-1365UE and Intel Core i7-9750HF are both mobile processors, but they represent two very different design philosophies from Intel. The 1365UE is a modern, low-power Raptor Lake part aimed at efficiency, while the 9750HF is a higher-power Coffee Lake chip from 2019. Benchmark data shows the newer 1365UE winning every single head-to-head comparison, yet the margins are surprisingly narrow given the generational gap. This analysis explores where each chip holds an advantage, what the architectural differences mean, and why the older 9750HF remains competitive in the aggregate.

Where Each One Wins

The data presents a clean sweep for the Intel Core i7-1365UE. Across six Cinebench tests—spanning R15, R20, and R23, both single-core and multi-core—the 1365UE takes the win in every instance. The margins are consistent, ranging from 6.4% to 6.5% in favor of the newer chip. This suggests a uniform performance advantage rather than a workload-specific strength.

However, the Intel Core i7-9750HF is not without merit. While it loses every direct benchmark, its average benchmark score of 2662 is only 0.6% behind the 1365UE's average of 2677. This near-parity in the aggregate indicates that the 9750HF may hold up well in scenarios not covered by the Cinebench suite. Additionally, the 9750HF has a Geekbench result in its file—scoring 4844 multi-core and 1365 single-core—whereas the 1365UE has no Geekbench data listed, leaving that comparison unexplored.

The use-case split is clear: the 1365UE wins on raw Cinebench rendering performance, but the 9750HF's competitive average score suggests it can still handle similar workloads at a slightly lower level. The 1365UE's advantage is real but not overwhelming, making the choice between them depend on other factors like power consumption and platform support.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras and design goals. The Intel Core i7-1365UE is built on Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node, manufactured by Intel. It features 10 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 1700.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. Its cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and its PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The chip includes integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units and fits into the Intel BGA 1744 socket.

The Intel Core i7-9750HF, in contrast, uses the older Coffee Lake architecture on a 14 nm process, with a die size of 149 mm². It has only 6 cores but still manages 12 threads, thanks to Hyper-Threading. Its base clock is higher at 2.60 GHz, but its boost clock is lower at 4.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy is smaller per core: 64 KB L1, 256 KB L2, and 12 MB shared L3. It supports only DDR4 memory, though it does offer a listed memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The 9750HF has no integrated graphics, uses PCIe Gen 3, and fits the Intel BGA 1440 socket. Its production status is end-of-life, while the 1365UE remains active.

These differences explain the performance gap. The 1365UE's newer node, higher core count, and larger per-core caches give it an edge in multi-threaded tasks. The 9750HF's higher base clock helps it in short bursts, but its older architecture and lower boost clock limit its ceiling.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i7-1365UE has 10 cores, while the Intel Core i7-9750HF has 6 cores. Both offer 12 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in multi-core workloads?

A: The 1365UE leads consistently. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 9257 versus 8696 for the 9750HF, a delta of 6.5%. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the scores are 3887 and 3652, respectively, also a 6.4% gap.

Q: Does the 9750HF have integrated graphics?

A: No. The Intel Core i7-9750HF has no integrated graphics, whereas the 1365UE includes Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units.

Q: Which processor supports DDR5 memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i7-1365UE supports DDR5, along with DDR4. The 9750HF is limited to DDR4.

Q: Are these processors still in production?

A: The 1365UE is listed as active, while the 9750HF is end-of-life.

Q: How close are their average benchmark scores?

A: The 1365UE has an average benchmark score of 2677, and the 9750HF has 2662. The 1365UE is 0.6% ahead.

Specification Differences

The two chips diverge on nearly every key specification. Core count differs: 10 for the 1365UE versus 6 for the 9750HF. Base clocks are 1700.00 MHz for the 1365UE and 2.60 GHz for the 9750HF. Boost clocks are 4.90 GHz and 4.50 GHz, respectively. Thermal design power is a major split: the 1365UE is rated at 15 W, while the 9750HF draws 45 W.

Socket compatibility is different: the 1365UE uses Intel BGA 1744, the 9750HF uses Intel BGA 1440. The process nodes are 10 nm for the 1365UE and 14 nm for the 9750HF. Cache sizes per core are larger on the 1365UE: 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2, versus 64 KB and 256 KB on the 9750HF. Both share 12 MB of L3.

Memory support differs, with the 1365UE accepting DDR4 and DDR5, while the 9750HF only handles DDR4. The 1365UE offers PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes, while the 9750HF has PCIe Gen 3. Integrated graphics are present on the 1365UE (Iris Xe 80EU) but absent on the 9750HF. The die size of the 9750HF is 149 mm²; the 1365UE's die size is not listed. Release dates are 2023-01-03 for the 1365UE and 2019-04-22 for the 9750HF.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results tell a consistent story. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 1365UE scores 932 against 876 for the 9750HF, a 6.4% win. Single-core R15 is 131 versus 123, a 6.5% margin. Moving to R20, multi-core is 3887 versus 3652 (6.4%), and single-core is 548 versus 515 (6.4%). In R23, the multi-core gap is 9257 versus 8696 (6.5%), and single-core is 1306 versus 1227 (6.4%).

The 1365UE wins all six head-to-head tests. The largest margin is 6.5%, seen in R15 single-core and R23 multi-core. The smallest is 6.4%, appearing in the other four tests. This uniformity suggests a clock-for-clock efficiency advantage for the newer architecture, as the 9750HF's higher base clock (2.60 GHz versus 1.70 GHz) does not translate into a win.

The 9750HF's best showing is in Geekbench, where it scores 4844 multi-core and 1365 single-core, but there is no corresponding Geekbench score for the 1365UE to compare. Without that data point, the Cinebench sweep stands as the only direct comparison, and it favors the 1365UE.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core i7-1365UE as the better performer in Cinebench workloads, winning every head-to-head test by roughly 6.4% to 6.5%. Its higher core count, larger caches, and newer 10 nm process give it a clear edge in rendering tasks. The 15 W TDP is also a significant advantage for mobile designs, allowing for thinner and lighter laptops without the cooling demands of a 45 W chip.

The Intel Core i7-9750HF, however, is not obsolete. Its average benchmark score of 2662 is nearly identical to the 1365UE's 2677, and its Geekbench results show respectable numbers. For users who prioritize a higher base clock or already have a platform built around the BGA 1440 socket, the 9750HF remains a capable option, especially given its end-of-life status may lead to lower system costs.

The verdict from the benchmarks is straightforward: the 1365UE is the superior chip for multi-threaded and single-threaded Cinebench performance. The 9750HF is a viable alternative in aggregate terms, but it cannot match the 1365UE's efficiency or raw output in the tested scenarios. For new builds, the 1365UE is the logical choice; for legacy upgrades, the 9750HF still holds its own.