Intel Core i7-1365UE vs Intel Core i7-9700T Comparison

The Intel Core i7-1365UE and Intel Core i7-9700T are two very different processors that end up in nearly the same performance tier. The data shows the 1365UE wins every single head-to-head benchmark in the pack, yet the average benchmark scores are remarkably close — 2677 for the 1365UE versus 2668 for the 9700T, a gap of only 0.4%. This is a case where a newer, power-sipping mobile chip outguns an older desktop part across the board, but the overall averages suggest the 9700T still holds its own in a broader context.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The 1365UE sweeps all six Cinebench tests listed, and the margin is consistent across every workload. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 1365UE scores 9257 against the 9700T’s 8325, a delta of 11.2%. The single-core R23 run tells the same story: 1306 for the 1365UE versus 1175 for the 9700T, another 11.1% advantage. These are not narrow wins; they represent a solid, repeatable performance gap in both lightly-threaded and fully-threaded rendering tasks.

The pattern holds in older Cinebench versions. In R20 multi-core, the 1365UE posts 3887 versus 3496 for the 9700T, again 11.2% ahead. The R20 single-core result is 548 versus 493, an 11.2% lead. Even in the oldest test, R15 multi-core, the 1365UE’s 932 beats the 9700T’s 839 by 11.1%, and R15 single-core shows 131 versus 118, an 11% edge. There is no benchmark in this set where the 9700T takes the lead; the 1365UE wins all six, with deltas ranging from 11.0% to 11.2%.

What is notable is how uniform the margin is. The 1365UE does not just win on multi-threaded workloads where its 10 cores and 12 threads might be expected to help; it wins by nearly the same percentage in single-core tests. This suggests the advantage comes from architectural efficiency rather than just core count. The 9700T’s best showing is in R15 multi-core, where it trails by 11.1%, but the gap does not widen in heavier tests like R23 multi-core, where it also trails by 11.2%. The 1365UE simply executes more work per clock in every scenario tested.

The average benchmark scores from the nearest rivals list put this in perspective. The 1365UE’s average of 2677 is only 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-9500F (2670) and 0.4% ahead of the 9700T (2668). The 9700T, in turn, sits 0.1% behind the i5-9500F and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon E5-4650 v3 (2664). In other words, despite the 1365UE’s clean sweep in head-to-head tests, the two CPUs are effectively peers in the broader benchmark landscape. The 9700T’s extra Geekbench results — 5503 multi-core and 1392 single-core — are not matched by the 1365UE in the pack, which may explain why the averages converge so tightly.

The Verdict

From the data, the Intel Core i7-1365UE is the outright faster processor in every benchmark where both are tested. If the choice is purely about Cinebench performance, the 1365UE is the clear pick, delivering roughly 11% more performance across the board. Its wins are consistent, and there is no workload in the pack where the 9700T fights back. Anyone building for rendering, encoding, or any task that scales with Cinebench scores should favor the 1365UE.

However, the 9700T is not a slouch. Its average benchmark score of 2668 places it within 0.4% of the 1365UE’s 2677, and it even edges out the Xeon E5-4650 v3 by 0.1%. The 9700T also has a Geekbench presence that the 1365UE lacks in this data, with a multi-core score of 5503 and a single-core score of 1392. Those numbers suggest the 9700T remains competitive in general-purpose computing, even if it loses the specific Cinebench matchups.

The 1365UE is the better CPU for pure performance per the head-to-head results. The 9700T is the better choice if you need a desktop part with a standard Socket 1151 layout, 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, and a 35W TDP that allows for more robust cooling without the constraints of a mobile BGA 1744 package. The 1365UE’s 15W TDP is impressive for the performance it delivers, but it is a mobile chip by design. For a fixed desktop build where power is less of a concern, the 9700T’s 35W TDP and larger die size (180.3 mm²) suggest it may sustain its clocks differently, though the benchmark data does not capture sustained-load behavior.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs come from different eras and design philosophies. The 1365UE is built on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-U codename, using a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. It packs 10 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. Its cache layout is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it pairs with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU for integrated graphics. The memory bandwidth is not listed, but the dual-channel DDR5 support gives it a modern memory pathway.

The 9700T is a Coffee Lake part, specifically from the Coffee Lake Refresh generation, built on Intel’s older 14 nm process. It has 8 cores and 8 threads, with no hyper-threading, running at a 2000 MHz base clock and a 4.30 GHz boost clock. Its cache is smaller per core: 64 KB of L1, 256 KB of L2, but it matches the 1365UE with 12 MB of shared L3. It supports only DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a listed memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. Its integrated graphics are the older UHD Graphics 630. The 9700T also has a larger die size of 180.3 mm², reflecting the older process node.

The process node difference is stark: 10 nm for the 1365UE versus 14 nm for the 9700T. This explains why the 1365UE achieves higher boost clocks (4.90 GHz versus 4.30 GHz) and better single-core performance despite a lower base clock (1700 MHz versus 2000 MHz). The 1365UE also benefits from hyper-threading, giving it 12 threads versus the 9700T’s 8, which contributes to its multi-core wins. The 9700T’s higher base clock helps it in idle-to-load transitions, but the 1365UE’s architectural efficiency wins in sustained workloads.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in nearly every key specification. The 1365UE has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the 9700T has 8 cores and 8 threads — a 2-core, 4-thread advantage for the newer part. Base clocks favor the 9700T at 2000 MHz versus 1700 MHz, but boost clocks favor the 1365UE at 4.90 GHz versus 4.30 GHz. The TDP is a major split: 15W for the 1365UE versus 35W for the 9700T, making the 1365UE far more power-efficient on paper.

The socket and platform are entirely different. The 1365UE uses Intel BGA 1744, a soldered mobile socket, while the 9700T uses Intel Socket 1151, a standard desktop socket. The process node is 10 nm for the 1365UE and 14 nm for the 9700T. Cache sizes differ per core: 80 KB L1 and 1.25 MB L2 for the 1365UE, versus 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 for the 9700T, though both share 12 MB of L3. Memory support is broader on the 1365UE, which accepts DDR4 and DDR5, while the 9700T is limited to DDR4. The 9700T has a listed memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s; the 1365UE has no such figure in the pack.

PCIe lanes differ as well: the 1365UE offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes, while the 9700T offers Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on the 1365UE versus UHD Graphics 630 on the 9700T. The 9700T has a launch MSRP of $323, but the 1365UE has no listed price. Production status also differs: the 1365UE is Active, while the 9700T is End-of-life. The 9700T has a part number (SRG17) and a release date of 2019-04-22; the 1365UE was released on 2023-01-03.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU is faster in multi-core Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i7-1365UE scores 9257, which is 11.2% ahead of the Intel Core i7-9700T’s 8325.

Q: Does the 9700T win any benchmark in the head-to-head set?

A: No. The 1365UE wins all six Cinebench tests, with deltas between 11.0% and 11.2%. The 9700T has zero wins in the head-to-head data.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The 1365UE has an average score of 2677, while the 9700T has 2668. The 1365UE is 0.4% ahead, and the 9700T is listed as 0.1% behind the Intel Core i5-9500F.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each?

A: The 1365UE has 10 cores and 12 threads. The 9700T has 8 cores and 8 threads, meaning the 1365UE has 2 more cores and 4 more threads.

Q: Which CPU supports DDR5 memory?

A: Only the 1365UE supports DDR5, in addition to DDR4. The 9700T supports only DDR4.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The 1365UE has a 15W TDP, while the 9700T has a 35W TDP. The 1365UE is rated for significantly lower power consumption.

Where Each One Wins

The 1365UE wins every benchmark in the head-to-head data, so its strengths are clear. It dominates in single-core performance — R23 single-core at 1306 versus 1175, an 11.1% lead — which translates to snappier everyday tasks, lighter gaming, and applications that rely on single-threaded responsiveness. Its multi-core wins, such as 9257 versus 8325 in R23 multi-core, make it the better choice for rendering, video encoding, and other parallel workloads. The 1365UE also wins on power efficiency with its 15W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops or compact systems where heat and battery life matter. Its support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4 lanes (8 lanes) gives it a modern platform advantage for future upgrades to memory bandwidth and storage speeds.

The 9700T’s wins are not in the benchmark data, but it has contextual advantages. Its 35W TDP, while higher, is still low for a desktop part, and its Socket 1151 platform allows for easy replacement or upgrading without soldering. The 9700T offers 16 PCIe Gen 3 lanes, which is double the lane count of the 1365UE, making it better suited for systems with multiple expansion cards or high-bandwidth peripherals that do not need Gen 4 speeds. Its 2000 MHz base clock is higher than the 1365UE’s 1700 MHz, which may help in scenarios with constant, moderate load where boost clocks are not sustained. The 9700T also has a listed memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, a concrete figure that the 1365UE lacks, indicating a defined memory throughput ceiling. In terms of longevity, the 9700T is end-of-life, but its Geekbench scores — 5503 multi-core and 1392 single-core — suggest it still performs adequately in general computing, even if those tests are not directly comparable to the Cinebench wins of the 1365UE. For a desktop builder who values a standard socket, more PCIe lanes, and a higher base clock, the 9700T remains a viable option despite losing the benchmark war.