Intel Core i7-12700TE vs Intel Xeon W-2145 Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i7-12700TE

CORE STATE Alder Lake-S
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1400 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 25 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Alder Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon W-2145

CORE STATE Skylake-W
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.7 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 11 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 140W
ARCHITECTURE Skylake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2017

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,586
1,542
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
223
217
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
6,612
6,425
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
933
906
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
15,745
15,299
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,222
2,159
geekbench_multicore
7,217
8,712
geekbench_singlecore
1,567
1,345

Analysis: Intel Core i7-12700TE vs Intel Xeon W-2145

The Intel Xeon W-2145 and Intel Core i7-12700TE occupy opposite ends of the hardware spectrum, yet they land in the same performance percentile. Both CPUs sit at the 58th percentile among all processors, and their average benchmark scores are nearly identical — the Xeon posts 4576 while the Core i7 achieves 4513. That statistical tie masks a fundamental split: the older workstation chip wins decisively in Geekbench multi-core, while the newer desktop chip takes every Cinebench iteration and the single-core Geekbench test. The data reveals a generational clash between Skylake-W’s raw throughput and Alder Lake’s architectural efficiency.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most lopsided result belongs to the Xeon W-2145 in Geekbench multi-core. It scores 8712 against the Core i7-12700TE’s 7217, a 20.7% margin. That is the only benchmark where the Xeon comes out ahead, and it is a substantial one. For workloads that scale across many threads in that specific test, the older chip’s advantage is clear.

Every other head-to-head comparison favors the Core i7-12700TE. The margins are consistent and narrow in Cinebench. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Core i7 scores 1586 versus 1542, a 2.8% lead. Single-core in the same test shows a 2.7% edge, with 223 points against 217. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20: multi-core is 6612 versus 6425 (2.8% ahead), and single-core is 933 versus 906 (2.9% ahead). Cinebench R23 tells the same story — the Core i7 wins multi-core with 15745 against 15299 and single-core with 2222 against 2159, both by 2.8%.

Geekbench single-core is where the Core i7 stretches its lead. It scores 1567 versus the Xeon’s 1345, a 14.2% advantage. That is the second-largest delta in the entire comparison, and it highlights the single-thread performance gap between the two architectures. Across all eight benchmarks, the Core i7 wins seven, while the Xeon takes just one.

The average benchmark scores tell a similar tale. The Xeon’s 4576 average is only 0.6% above the Core i7’s 4513, a negligible difference. Both chips sit within 0.8% of their nearest rivals: the Xeon is 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700KF and 0.8% behind the Intel Core i9-10900, while the Core i7 is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 and 0.7% behind the Intel Core i5-1340P.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different eras of Intel design. The Xeon W-2145 uses the Skylake architecture on the Skylake-W codename, built on a 14 nm process with a die size of 484 mm². The Core i7-12700TE uses the Alder Lake architecture on the Alder Lake-S codename, built on a 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². That process shrink allows the newer chip to pack more functionality into less than half the silicon area.

Core counts diverge sharply. The Xeon offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core i7 provides 12 cores and 20 threads. The Core i7’s hybrid design is not explicitly detailed in the data, but the extra cores and threads are evident. Cache configurations differ as well. The Xeon has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 11 MB of shared L3. The Core i7 increases each level: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 25 MB of shared L3 — more than double the L3 capacity.

Memory support marks another clear divide. The Xeon uses DDR4 with a quad-channel memory bus and a measured bandwidth of 85.3 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Core i7 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but uses a dual-channel memory bus, and its memory bandwidth is not listed. The Xeon’s quad-channel setup gives it a memory throughput advantage on paper, though the Core i7’s dual-channel support for faster DDR5 could offset that in practice. ECC support is exclusive to the Xeon, which aligns with its server/workstation positioning.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The Xeon provides PCIe Gen 3 with 48 lanes from the CPU. The Core i7 provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Core i7 also includes integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 — while the Xeon has no integrated graphics listed.

Where Each One Wins

The Xeon W-2145 wins in Geekbench multi-core, and that result points toward its strengths. The quad-channel memory bus and higher TDP of 140 W suggest a design aimed at sustained throughput in memory-sensitive or heavily threaded workstation tasks. The data shows a 20.7% lead in that specific benchmark, which could translate to advantages in databases, virtual machines, or content creation pipelines that rely on the Geekbench multi-core workload. The Xeon’s ECC memory support further suits reliability-focused server environments.

The Core i7-12700TE wins everywhere else, including all Cinebench versions and Geekbench single-core. Its 14.2% single-core lead in Geekbench indicates a major architectural advantage in lightly threaded applications. The consistent 2.8% margin across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests shows that its 12-core, 20-thread configuration delivers steady gains in rendering workloads. The Core i7 also carries integrated graphics, which the Xeon lacks, making it viable for systems without a discrete GPU.

The TDP gap is striking. The Core i7 is rated at 35 W, while the Xeon is rated at 140 W. Despite using a quarter of the power budget, the Core i7 wins seven of eight benchmarks. That efficiency advantage comes from the newer 10 nm process and the Alder Lake architecture. The Core i7 also has a higher boost clock at 4.60 GHz versus the Xeon’s 4.50 GHz, though the Xeon has a much higher base clock at 3.70 GHz against the Core i7’s 1.40 GHz base.

Specification Differences

The two chips differ across nearly every major specification. The Xeon W-2145 has 8 cores and 16 threads; the Core i7-12700TE has 12 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks are dramatically different: the Xeon runs at 3.70 GHz, while the Core i7 sits at 1.40 GHz. Boost clocks are closer, with the Core i7 slightly ahead at 4.60 GHz versus 4.50 GHz.

TDP is a major differentiator. The Xeon draws 140 W, while the Core i7 is rated at just 35 W. Sockets differ entirely: the Xeon uses Intel Socket 2066, and the Core i7 uses Intel Socket 1700. Process nodes also differ, with the Xeon on 14 nm and the Core i7 on 10 nm. Die sizes reflect that gap, with the Xeon at 484 mm² and the Core i7 at 215 mm².

Cache hierarchies are not shared. The Xeon has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 11 MB shared L3. The Core i7 has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 25 MB shared L3. Memory support diverges: the Xeon uses DDR4 with a quad-channel bus and 85.3 GB/s bandwidth; the Core i7 supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and no listed bandwidth. ECC memory is supported only on the Xeon. PCIe generations and lane counts also differ, with the Xeon offering Gen 3 with 48 lanes and the Core i7 offering Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

Integrated graphics appear only on the Core i7, which includes UHD Graphics 770. The Xeon lists no integrated graphics. The Xeon is marked as end-of-life production status, while the Core i7 is active. The Xeon’s launch MSRP is $1113, and the Core i7’s launch MSRP is $344.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2145 has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 4576, compared to the Intel Core i7-12700TE’s 4513. That is a 0.6% difference, placing both chips at the 58th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How large is the Core i7-12700TE’s single-core lead in Geekbench?

A: The Core i7-12700TE scores 1567 in Geekbench single-core, which is 14.2% ahead of the Xeon W-2145’s 1345. This is the second-largest performance gap in the head-to-head comparison.

Q: Does the Xeon W-2145 win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the Xeon W-2145 wins Geekbench multi-core with a score of 8712, beating the Core i7-12700TE’s 7217 by 20.7%. That is the only benchmark victory for the Xeon out of eight total tests.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2145 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i7-12700TE has 12 cores and 20 threads, giving it a 4-core and 4-thread advantage.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2145 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i7-12700TE does not support ECC memory, which is consistent with its desktop market segment.

Q: How do the TDP ratings compare?

A: The Intel Xeon W-2145 has a TDP of 140 W, while the Intel Core i7-12700TE has a TDP of 35 W. The Core i7 achieves higher benchmark scores in most tests despite using only a quarter of the power budget.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i7-12700TE
W-2145
Core Specs
Cores
12
8 -33.3%
Threads
20
16 -20.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
1,400
3.7 -99.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.6
4.5 -2.2%
Frequency (GHz)
1,400
3.7 -99.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.6
4.5 -2.2%
Multiplier
19
37 +94.7%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
25 MB (shared)
11 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
140 +300.0%
Architecture
Architecture
Alder Lake
Skylake
Codename
Alder Lake-S
Skylake-W
Generation
Core i7 (Alder Lake-S)
Xeon W (Skylake-W)
Process Size
10 nm
14 nm
Die Size
215 mm²
484 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Quad-channel
Memory Bandwidth
85.3 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 2066
Chipsets
R680E, Q670, Q670E, H610, H610E
PCIe
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 48 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
End-of-life
Launch Price
$344
$1113
Part Number
SR3LQ
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA2066
Tj Max
100°C
View Core i7-12700TE Details View Xeon W-2145 Details