Intel Core i7-12700F vs Intel Core i7-13700TE Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i7-12700F

CORE STATE Alder Lake-S
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 25 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Alder Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-13700TE

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-S
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1100 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 30 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads
8,733
N/A
3dmark_2_threads
1,983
N/A
3dmark_4_threads
3,837
N/A
3dmark_8_threads
6,667
N/A
3dmark_max_threads
9,403
N/A
3dmark_single_thread
1,005
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,610
1,884
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
271
265
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
10,767
7,853
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,519
1,108
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
15,291
18,698
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,898
2,639
geekbench_multicore
13,039
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
2,169
N/A
passmark_data_compression
384,463
243,565
passmark_data_encryption
20,185
15,006
passmark_extended_instructions
24,783
13,750
passmark_find_prime_numbers
98
101
passmark_floating_point_math
81,804
66,421
passmark_integer_math
107,013
97,911
passmark_multithread
30,445
22,754
passmark_physics
1,488
1,368
passmark_random_string_sorting
39,852
27,307
passmark_single_thread
3,850
3,422
passmark_singlethread
3,850
3,422

Analysis: Intel Core i7-12700F vs Intel Core i7-13700TE

The Intel Core i7-12700F and Intel Core i7-13700TE are both 12th and 13th Generation Intel processors respectively, yet the benchmark data reveals a clear split in their performance identities. The i7-12700F dominates the majority of head-to-head tests, winning 14 of 17 comparisons, while the i7-13700TE secures decisive victories in the Cinebench R23 suite. This divergence points to distinct design priorities: the i7-12700F is a high-performance desktop part with a 65 TDP, while the i7-13700TE is a low-power embedded-focused chip with a 35 TDP. The data shows that raw workload handling favors the older Alder Lake chip, but the newer Raptor Lake part pulls ahead in specific rendering scenarios, making the choice dependent on the application mix.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-12700F is the clear winner in the vast majority of measured workloads. Its victories span 14 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, including all PassMark tests except one. The most striking advantage appears in data compression, where the i7-12700F scores 384463 against the i7-13700TE’s 243565, a 57.8% lead. Similarly, extended instructions show an 80.2% margin (24783 vs 13750), indicating that the i7-12700F is far better suited for compute-heavy tasks like encryption, mathematical operations, and sorting. The i7-12700F also wins in every Cinebench R15 and R20 test, with multicore scores of 2610 and 10767 respectively, compared to the i7-13700TE’s 1884 and 7853.

The Intel Core i7-13700TE, conversely, claims only three wins, but they are concentrated in the Cinebench R23 suite, which is a modern rendering benchmark. Its multicore score of 18698 beats the i7-12700F’s 15291 by 18.2%, and its single-core score of 2639 surpasses 1898 by 28.1%. The third win is a narrow one in PassMark’s find prime numbers test, where it scores 101 versus 98, a 3% margin. This pattern suggests that the i7-13700TE is optimized for newer, more efficient rendering workloads, while the i7-12700F excels in broader, legacy-heavy tasks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors share the same Intel Socket 1700 and are built on the same 10 nm process node, but their underlying architectures differ significantly. The i7-12700F uses Alder Lake-S, while the i7-13700TE uses Raptor Lake-S. This generational shift brings a change in core configuration: the i7-12700F has 12 cores and 20 threads, whereas the i7-13700TE offers 16 cores and 24 threads. Despite having fewer cores, the i7-12700F runs at a higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz compared to 4.80 GHz for the i7-13700TE, and a much higher base clock of 2.10 GHz versus 1100.00 MHz for the i7-13700TE.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The i7-12700F has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 25 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i7-13700TE provides 2 MB of L2 per core and 30 MB of shared L3. Both use the same 80 KB L1 per core. The i7-13700TE also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, whereas the i7-12700F has no integrated graphics. PCIe lane counts differ as well: the i7-12700F offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i7-13700TE provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Die size increases from 215 mm² on the i7-12700F to 257 mm² on the i7-13700TE, reflecting the added cores and cache.

The i7-13700TE’s 35 TDP is notably lower than the i7-12700F’s 65 TDP, which explains its reduced clock speeds and its focus on efficiency. Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and neither supports ECC memory. The i7-12700F was released on 2022-01-03, while the i7-13700TE followed a year later on 2023-01-03.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single win for the i7-12700F comes in PassMark’s extended instructions test, where it scores 24783 against the i7-13700TE’s 13750, an 80.2% advantage. This is followed by data compression, where the i7-12700F leads 384463 to 243565, a 57.8% gap. Random string sorting shows a 45.9% lead (39852 vs 27307), and data encryption is 34.5% higher (20185 vs 15006). In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i7-12700F wins 2610 to 1884, a 38.5% margin, and in R20 multicore it leads 10767 to 7853, a 37.1% gap. The i7-12700F also wins PassMark multithread by 33.8% (30445 vs 22754) and floating point math by 23.2% (81804 vs 66421). Single-thread performance favors the i7-12700F by 12.5% (3850 vs 3422), and integer math by 9.3% (107013 vs 97911). Physics and prime number tests show smaller margins of 8.8% and 3% respectively, with the latter going to the i7-13700TE.

For the i7-13700TE, its biggest win is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 2639 versus 1898, a 28.1% advantage. Its R23 multicore win is 18698 versus 15291, a 18.2% lead. These are the only substantial victories for the i7-13700TE, but they are notable because R23 is a widely used modern benchmark. The data indicates that the i7-13700TE’s newer architecture and larger cache (30 MB L3 vs 25 MB) provide a significant boost in this specific workload, despite its lower TDP and clock speeds.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700TE has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i7-12700F has 12 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Why does the i7-12700F win most benchmarks despite having fewer cores?

A: The i7-12700F has a higher base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, compared to the i7-13700TE’s 1100.00 MHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. This higher clock speed, combined with a 65 TDP versus 35 TDP, allows it to perform better in most tasks, as seen in its 14 wins out of 17 benchmarks.

Q: In which benchmark does the i7-13700TE show the largest advantage?

A: The i7-13700TE’s largest win is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 2639 versus the i7-12700F’s 1898, a 28.1% difference.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and neither supports ECC memory.

Q: Does the i7-12700F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the i7-12700F does not have integrated graphics, while the i7-13700TE includes UHD Graphics 770.

Q: What is the difference in PCIe lane support?

A: The i7-12700F offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i7-13700TE offers Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only).

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The i7-12700F has 12 cores and 20 threads, while the i7-13700TE has 16 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are 2.10 GHz for the i7-12700F and 1100.00 MHz for the i7-13700TE, with boost clocks of 4.90 GHz and 4.80 GHz respectively. TDP is 65 W for the i7-12700F and 35 W for the i7-13700TE. Cache sizes diverge: L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core for the i7-12700F versus 2 MB per core for the i7-13700TE, and L3 cache is 25 MB shared versus 30 MB shared. Die size is 215 mm² for the i7-12700F and 257 mm² for the i7-13700TE. The i7-13700TE has integrated UHD Graphics 770, while the i7-12700F has none. PCIe lanes are 16 for the i7-12700F and 20 for the i7-13700TE, both Gen 5 (CPU only). Release dates are 2022-01-03 for the i7-12700F and 2023-01-03 for the i7-13700TE. The i7-12700F has a launch MSRP of $324, while the i7-13700TE has no listed launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core i7-12700F as the superior choice for general-purpose computing and legacy-heavy workloads. Its wins in 14 of 17 benchmarks, including massive leads in data compression (57.8%), extended instructions (80.2%), and multithread performance (33.8%), make it the obvious pick for tasks like encryption, sorting, and integer math. The i7-12700F’s higher clock speeds and 65 TDP provide consistent performance across the board, and its 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs matches the i7-13700TE’s percentile, despite the i7-13700TE having a slightly higher average benchmark score of 31028 versus 31081.

The Intel Core i7-13700TE, however, is the better option for users focused on modern rendering workloads, specifically Cinebench R23. Its 18.2% multicore and 28.1% single-core advantages in that test indicate that its newer Raptor Lake architecture, larger L2 and L3 caches, and 16 cores can be leveraged effectively in contemporary applications. Its 35 TDP also makes it more suitable for power-constrained environments, though this comes at the cost of lower performance in most other tests. For a user prioritizing efficiency and modern render tasks, the i7-13700TE is the rational choice; for everything else, the i7-12700F delivers measurably better results. The nearest rival data confirms they are closely matched overall, with the i7-12700F leading the i7-13700TE by 0.2% in average score, but the distribution of wins is heavily skewed toward the i7-12700F.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i7-12700F
i7-13700TE
Core Specs
Cores
12
16 +33.3%
Threads
20
24 +20.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.1
1,100 +52281.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.9
4.8 -2.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.1
1,100 +52281.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.9
4.8 -2.0%
Multiplier
21
11 -47.6%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
25 MB (shared)
30 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
35 -46.2%
PL1
65W
35 W
PL2
180W
106 W
Architecture
Architecture
Alder Lake
Raptor Lake
Codename
Alder Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Generation
Core i7 (Alder Lake-S)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake)
Process Size
10 nm
10 nm
Die Size
215 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
ECC Memory
No
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
H610, H610E, Q670, Q670E, R680E, W680
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 4
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
1600 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
800 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$324
Part Number
SRL4R
SRMG4
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Laminar RM1
View Core i7-12700F Details View Core i7-13700TE Details