Intel Core i7-1195G7 vs Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data for these two processors is remarkably close, with the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 and Intel Core i7-1195G7 posting nearly identical scores across the Cinebench suite. The Xeon takes four of the six head-to-head matchups, but every single result is separated by a delta of 0%, meaning the differences are effectively within measurement noise. In Cinebench R15 multicore, both processors score exactly 887 points, a dead heat. The single-core R15 result is equally tied at 125 points for each. The R20 multicore test shows the Core i7-1195G7 edging ahead with a score of 3697 against the Xeon’s 3696, a one-point margin. The R20 single-core test is another exact tie at 521 points. In R23 multicore, the Core i7-1195G7 again wins by a hair, scoring 8803 versus the Xeon’s 8800. The R23 single-core result is tied at 1242 points for both chips.

Despite the Xeon’s higher win count of 4 versus 2, the practical interpretation is that these two CPUs deliver essentially identical Cinebench performance. The Core i7-1195G7 does have an additional Geekbench result in the database, scoring 4248 in multicore and 1584 in single-core, but the Xeon lacks comparable Geekbench data for a direct comparison. The average benchmark score tells a slightly different story: the Core i7-1195G7 averages 2638 across its recorded tests, while the Xeon averages 2545. That is a gap of roughly 3.7% in favor of the mobile chip, driven by the inclusion of the Geekbench scores which are not present for the Xeon.

Looking at the nearest rivals for context, the Xeon E5-1650 v3 sits at the 49th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its closest competitor is the Intel Xeon E5-4640 v3, which averages 2550, a delta of -0.2% from the 1650 v3’s 2545. The AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS averages 2557, also slightly ahead at -0.4% delta. The Intel Core i3-10325 and Intel Xeon E-2244G average 2530 and 2527 respectively, placing them 0.6% and 0.7% behind the Xeon. The Core i7-1195G7 also holds the 49th percentile, with an average score of 2638. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-8950HK, averages 2641, a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core i7-5820K averages 2642, also -0.1% behind. The Intel Xeon E-2274G and Intel Core i7-7740X average 2643 and 2648, respectively, placing them 0.2% and 0.4% ahead of the 1195G7.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear picture: for pure multi-threaded and single-threaded Cinebench workloads, the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 and Intel Core i7-1195G7 are effectively indistinguishable. Every head-to-head result in the database shows a delta of 0%, with the largest margin being a single point in R20 multicore and a three-point margin in R23 multicore, both favoring the Core i7-1195G7. The Xeon’s four nominal wins are all exact ties, so the actual performance difference is negligible.

Which processor should you choose? The answer depends entirely on platform and feature requirements, not on benchmark scores. The Xeon E5-1650 v3 is a server and workstation part with support for ECC memory, quad-channel DDR4, and 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU. It also has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking. The Core i7-1195G7 is a mobile processor with integrated Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU, dual-channel memory support, and PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. It has no ECC support and its multiplier is locked. If the workload requires ECC memory or a high lane-count PCIe platform, the Xeon is the only option. If integrated graphics, a smaller physical footprint, or a lower thermal envelope are priorities, the Core i7-1195G7 is the obvious pick. The benchmark data offers no reason to prefer one over the other on raw compute capability.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 and Intel Core i7-1195G7 represent two very different eras and design philosophies. The Xeon is built on the Haswell architecture, specifically the Haswell-EP codename, using a 22 nm process node. It contains 2,600 million transistors on a 356 mm² die. It features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy is organized as 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 15 MB L3 cache. Memory support is DDR4 with a quad-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 68.3 GB/s. It supports ECC memory, a hallmark of server and workstation parts. The socket is Intel Socket 2011-3, and the processor was released in September 2014.

The Core i7-1195G7 is built on the Tiger Lake architecture, codenamed Tiger Lake-U, using a 10 nm process node. The die size is 144 mm², and the database does not list a transistor count. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache layout is different: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. Memory support includes DDR4, LPDDR4, and LPDDR4X, but the memory bus is dual-channel and the memory bandwidth figure is not recorded. ECC memory is not supported. The socket is Intel BGA 1449, indicating a soldered mobile design. It integrates Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU, which the Xeon lacks entirely. It was released in May 2021.

The process node difference is significant: 22 nm versus 10 nm. The Xeon’s higher TDP of 140 watts reflects its workstation heritage, while the Core i7-1195G7 operates at only 28 watts. The Xeon’s larger die and higher transistor count are offset by the newer, denser process on the mobile chip. The Core i7-1195G7 has a much higher boost clock at 5.00 GHz versus the Xeon’s 3.80 GHz, which explains why its single-core scores match despite having fewer cores. The Xeon’s overall performance parity is achieved through its two additional cores and twelve threads, plus a larger shared L3 cache. The Core i7-1195G7 compensates with higher clocks and a newer architecture. The Xeon’s quad-channel memory bus and ECC support are enterprise features absent on the Core i7-1195G7, which instead offers integrated graphics and PCIe Gen 4 support.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmark matchups in the database?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 wins 4 of the 6 head-to-head Cinebench matchups, while the Intel Core i7-1195G7 wins 2. However, all six results have a delta of 0%, meaning the scores are effectively identical.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-1195G7 support ECC memory?

A: No. The database lists ECC memory support as false for the Core i7-1195G7, while the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in average benchmark score between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-1195G7 has an average benchmark score of 2638, while the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 has an average of 2545. The Core i7-1195G7’s average is higher by 93 points, but this includes Geekbench results that are not recorded for the Xeon.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-1195G7 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3’s boost clock of 3.80 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 have integrated graphics?

A: No. The database lists integrated graphics as null for the Xeon. The Intel Core i7-1195G7 includes Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU.

Q: Are both processors considered end-of-life in the database?

A: Yes. Both the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 and the Intel Core i7-1195G7 have a production status of end-of-life.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 wins in scenarios that require a server or workstation platform. Its support for ECC memory is a decisive factor for error-sensitive workloads, and its quad-channel memory bus with 68.3 GB/s bandwidth provides substantially more memory throughput than the Core i7-1195G7’s dual-channel setup. The Xeon also offers 40 PCIe Gen 3 lanes from the CPU, which is critical for multi-GPU configurations, high-end storage arrays, or other expansion-heavy builds. Its unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, appealing to users who want to extract additional performance from a workstation platform. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it matches the Core i7-1195G7 in multi-threaded Cinebench scores despite a much lower boost clock.

The Intel Core i7-1195G7 wins in mobile and compact scenarios. Its 28 watt TDP makes it suitable for thin and light laptops, whereas the Xeon’s 140 watt TDP demands a substantial cooling solution. The integrated Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU eliminates the need for a discrete GPU in basic display tasks, which is impossible with the Xeon. The Core i7-1195G7’s 5.00 GHz boost clock delivers top-tier single-threaded responsiveness, matching the Xeon’s scores in every single-core Cinebench test. It also supports PCIe Gen 4, offering newer connectivity standards than the Xeon’s Gen 3. The 10 nm process node and smaller 144 mm² die make it far more power-efficient per unit of performance. For any workload that does not require ECC or a high lane-count PCIe platform, the Core i7-1195G7 is the more practical choice due to its lower power draw, integrated graphics, and modern feature set.