CPU Comparison

The Intel Xeon E-2274G and Intel Core i7-1195G7 are both 4-core, 8-thread processors, yet they target fundamentally different segments: a server/workstation platform versus a mobile platform. Despite their similar core counts, the benchmark data reveals a fascinating split, with each chip claiming victories in different test suites. The Xeon E-2274G wins the Geekbench multicore test decisively, while the Core i7-1195G7 sweeps the Cinebench suite, making for a nuanced comparison that defies a simple "winner" label.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result in the head-to-head data is the Geekbench multicore score, where the Xeon E-2274G posts 5174 against the Core i7-1195G7's 4248. That is a 21.8% advantage for the Xeon, a massive margin that suggests the server-oriented chip handles certain multi-threaded workloads with significantly more efficiency. The Geekbench single-core result is essentially a tie, with the Xeon scoring 1586 and the Core i7 scoring 1584, a 0.1% difference that falls well within run-to-run variance.

The Cinebench results tell the opposite story. The Core i7-1195G7 wins every single Cinebench test, and the margins are remarkably consistent. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core i7 scores 887 against the Xeon's 835, a 5.9% delta. The single-core R15 test shows a similar gap: 125 versus 117, a 6.4% difference. The pattern continues in Cinebench R20, where the Core i7 scores 3697 multicore and 521 single-core, versus the Xeon's 3481 and 491, respectively, both representing 5.8% deltas. Cinebench R23 follows the same trend: the Core i7 scores 8803 multicore and 1242 single-core, while the Xeon manages 8289 and 1170, again a 5.8% margin in both cases.

The overall wins tally shows the Core i7-1195G7 taking 6 of the 8 head-to-head tests, but the Geekbench multicore result is so lopsided that the average benchmark scores for the two chips end up nearly identical. The Xeon E-2274G has an average benchmark score of 2643, while the Core i7-1195G7 sits at 2638. This puts them in the same percentile bracket, both ranking at the 49th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals list confirms just how close they are: the Xeon's nearest rival is the Core i7-1195G7 itself with a 0.2% delta, and the Core i7's nearest rival is the Xeon with a -0.2% delta. The data essentially places these two chips at parity in overall performance, despite their divergent results in specific workloads.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is substantial. The Xeon E-2274G is built on the Coffee Lake architecture, specifically Coffee Lake-S WS, using a 14 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The Core i7-1195G7 uses the newer Tiger Lake architecture, codenamed Tiger Lake-U, and is fabricated on a 10 nm process node. This process difference is significant, as the 10 nm node allows for a more compact and power-efficient design, which is reflected in the TDP: the Xeon consumes 83 watts while the Core i7 draws only 28 watts.

The cache hierarchies also differ. The Xeon provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i7 ups the ante with 80 KB of L1 per core, a substantially larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The die sizes reflect these differences, with the Xeon measuring 126 mm² and the Core i7 measuring 144 mm². The memory support diverges as well: the Xeon supports DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the Core i7 supports DDR4, LPDDR4, and LPDDR4X, also dual-channel, though the fact pack does not list a bandwidth figure for the mobile chip.

ECC memory support is a key differentiator. The Xeon E-2274G supports ECC memory, making it suitable for error-sensitive server and workstation tasks, while the Core i7-1195G7 does not. The integrated graphics also differ: the Xeon ships with HD Graphics P630, while the Core i7 features Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU, a much more capable iGPU. The PCIe capabilities are another point of divergence, with the Xeon offering Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and the Core i7 offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), giving the mobile chip a newer, faster interface.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Core i7-1195G7 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Xeon E-2274G boosts to 4.90 GHz. The Xeon has a higher base clock at 4.00 GHz compared to the Core i7's 2.90 GHz.

Q: Why does the Xeon E-2274G win Geekbench multicore but lose every Cinebench test?

A: The Geekbench multicore result shows a 21.8% advantage for the Xeon, scoring 5174 versus 4248. However, the Core i7-1195G7 wins all six Cinebench tests with deltas ranging from 5.8% to 6.4%. The data indicates that the Xeon excels in the specific multi-threaded workload that Geekbench measures, while the Core i7's architecture is better suited to Cinebench's rendering tasks.

Q: What are the differences in memory bandwidth and support?

A: The Xeon E-2274G supports DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the Core i7-1195G7 supports DDR4, LPDDR4, and LPDDR4X, though its bandwidth is not listed in the data. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Xeon E-2274G supports ECC memory, which is a key feature for server/workstation reliability. The Core i7-1195G7 does not support ECC memory.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The Xeon E-2274G includes HD Graphics P630, while the Core i7-1195G7 includes Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU. The Core i7's iGPU is based on a newer architecture and is generally more capable, though the fact pack provides no benchmark scores for either.

Q: What are the release dates and MSRPs of these chips?

A: The Xeon E-2274G was released on 2019-05-28 with a launch MSRP of $328. The Core i7-1195G7 was released on 2021-05-30 with a launch MSRP of $426. Both are end-of-life products.

Specification Differences

The specifications where the two processors differ are extensive. The base clocks are 4.00 GHz for the Xeon and 2.90 GHz for the Core i7, while the boost clocks are 4.90 GHz and 5.00 GHz, respectively. The TDP is a major point of separation: the Xeon consumes 83 watts versus the Core i7's 28 watts. The sockets are entirely different, with the Xeon using Intel Socket 1151 and the Core i7 using Intel BGA 1449.

The architecture and process node differ, with the Xeon on Coffee Lake at 14 nm and the Core i7 on Tiger Lake at 10 nm. The cache configurations are different at every level: L1 is 64 KB per core for the Xeon versus 80 KB per core for the Core i7; L2 is 256 KB per core versus 1.25 MB per core; and L3 is 8 MB shared versus 12 MB shared. The die sizes are 126 mm² and 144 mm², respectively. Memory support differs, with the Xeon limited to DDR4 and the Core i7 adding LPDDR4 and LPDDR4X. The memory bandwidth is listed for the Xeon at 42.7 GB/s, but no figure is given for the Core i7.

ECC support is exclusive to the Xeon, and the PCIe versions differ: Gen 3 for the Xeon and Gen 4 for the Core i7. Integrated graphics are HD Graphics P630 for the Xeon and Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU for the Core i7. The market segments are Server/Workstation versus Mobile. The release dates and launch MSRPs differ, with the Xeon at $328 and the Core i7 at $426. The part numbers are SRFDE for the Xeon and SRKSC for the Core i7.

The Verdict

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of two chips that are close in overall average score but excel in different domains. The Xeon E-2274G is the choice for workloads that align with Geekbench multicore performance, where it holds a commanding 21.8% lead over the Core i7-1195G7. Its 83-watt TDP and ECC memory support further reinforce its position as a server/workstation part. The Core i7-1195G7, with its 28-watt TDP and superior Cinebench scores across the board, is better suited for tasks that resemble rendering and compute workloads, as well as mobile form factors.

For a system builder prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput in a Geekbench-style workload, the Xeon E-2274G is the data-supported pick. For a user who values Cinebench rendering performance and lower power consumption, the Core i7-1195G7 is the better option. The 0.1% single-core Geekbench difference between the two is effectively a tie, so single-threaded performance in that test should not be a deciding factor. The final choice hinges on which benchmark suite best represents the intended workload, as the data shows no overall winner, only different winners for different tasks.