Intel Core i7-1195G7 vs Intel Core i7-9750HF Comparison

The Intel Core i7-9750HF and the Intel Core i7-1195G7 are both end-of-life mobile processors, but they represent two very different design philosophies from Intel. The data shows a clear split: the 1195G7 wins the majority of benchmark comparisons, taking 7 out of 8 head-to-head tests, but the 9750HF delivers a decisive victory in Geekbench multi-core. The 1195G7 is the better all-around choice for most users, offering superior single-threaded performance and a more modern feature set, while the 9750HF remains relevant specifically for multi-threaded workloads that can leverage its higher core count. The average benchmark scores are nearly identical—2662 for the 9750HF versus 2638 for the 1195G7—placing both in the 50th and 49th percentiles of all CPUs, respectively, meaning neither chip is a performance outlier in the broader market.

The Verdict

From the benchmark data, the Intel Core i7-1195G7 is the default recommendation for most buyers. It wins every Cinebench test—R15, R20, and R23—in both single-core and multi-core variants, with margins ranging from 1.2% to 1.6%. Its Geekbench single-core score of 1584 is 13.8% higher than the 9750HF’s 1365, which is a substantial lead for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The 1195G7 also brings a more modern architecture with a 10 nm process node and a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz, making it the superior choice for laptops where portability and efficiency are priorities.

However, the 9750HF is not without merit. Its Geekbench multi-core score of 4844 crushes the 1195G7’s 4248 by a full 14%. This indicates that the 9750HF’s six cores and twelve threads provide a significant advantage in heavily parallelized tasks that are not well-represented by the Cinebench suite. If your workload is dominated by multi-threaded encoding, rendering, or simulation that scales with core count, the 9750HF is the safer bet despite its older architecture. The data suggests a simple split: choose the 1195G7 for general-purpose performance and single-thread speed, or choose the 9750HF specifically for multi-core Geekbench-style workloads.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two chips is substantial. The 9750HF is built on Intel’s Coffee Lake architecture, specifically the Coffee Lake-HR refresh, using a 14 nm process node with a die size of 149 mm². It has six cores and twelve threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Its cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 memory over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, and it uses PCIe Gen 3. This is a purely performance-oriented chip with no integrated graphics listed.

The 1195G7, by contrast, uses Intel’s Tiger Lake architecture (Willow Cove-U) on a 10 nm process node, with a slightly smaller die size of 144 mm². It is a quad-core, eight-thread part with a higher base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its cache hierarchy is different: 80 KB of L1 per core and a much larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core, but the same 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support expands to include DDR4, LPDDR4, and LPDDR4X, though the memory bandwidth figure is not provided in the data. It also uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and includes integrated Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 with 96 execution units. The 1195G7’s launch MSRP was $426. The 9750HF, being a higher-TDP part at 45 W, targets thicker gaming and performance laptops, while the 1195G7’s 28 W TDP suits thinner ultrabooks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results show a consistent pattern: the 1195G7 edges out the 9750HF in Cinebench but loses decisively in Geekbench multi-core. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 1195G7 scores 887 against 876 for the 9750HF, a 1.2% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a similar story: 125 versus 123, a 1.6% lead for the 1195G7. Moving to Cinebench R20, the 1195G7 again wins multi-core with 3697 versus 3652, and single-core with 521 versus 515, both by 1.2%. The R23 results mirror this exactly, with the 1195G7 taking multi-core at 8803 versus 8696 and single-core at 1242 versus 1227, again by 1.2% margins.

The Geekbench results break the trend. In Geekbench multi-core, the 9750HF scores 4844, which is 14% higher than the 1195G7’s 4248. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and represents a major win for the six-core part. However, in Geekbench single-core, the 1195G7 rebounds with a score of 1584 versus 1365 for the 9750HF, a 13.8% advantage. This is a near-perfect mirror image of the multi-core result, showing that the 1195G7’s superior single-thread performance is offset by its lower core count in multi-threaded Geekbench scaling. Overall, the 1195G7 wins 7 of the 8 benchmarks, but the 9750HF’s single 14% victory in Geekbench multi-core is by far the largest margin in either direction.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-1195G7 has a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz, compared to the Intel Core i7-9750HF’s 4.50 GHz.

Q: How do the two chips compare in terms of core and thread counts?

A: The 9750HF has six cores and twelve threads, while the 1195G7 has four cores and eight threads. The 9750HF has a 50% advantage in physical core count and a 50% advantage in thread count.

Q: What is the largest performance difference in the head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The largest difference is in Geekbench multi-core, where the 9750HF scores 4844, which is 14% higher than the 1195G7’s 4248. The largest advantage for the 1195G7 is in Geekbench single-core, where it leads by 13.8%.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The 9750HF supports only DDR4, while the 1195G7 supports DDR4, LPDDR4, and LPDDR4X. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The 1195G7 includes integrated Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 with 96 execution units. The 9750HF has no integrated graphics listed in the data.

Q: What is the difference in their production status and release dates?

A: Both are end-of-life. The 9750HF was released on 2019-04-22, while the 1195G7 was released later on 2021-05-30.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-1195G7 is the clear winner in single-threaded performance and general-purpose computing. Its Geekbench single-core score of 1584 is 13.8% higher than the 9750HF’s, and it also wins every Cinebench single-core test by at least 1.2%. This makes it the better choice for everyday laptop use, including web browsing, office applications, and lightly-threaded productivity software. Its higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz and larger L2 cache per core (1.25 MB versus 256 KB) contribute to its superior responsiveness. Additionally, it offers integrated graphics, which the 9750HF lacks, making it a more versatile option for systems without a discrete GPU. Its lower 28 W TDP also makes it more suitable for thin-and-light designs.

The Intel Core i7-9750HF wins specifically in Geekbench multi-core, where its score of 4844 is 14% higher than the 1195G7’s. This indicates that its six-core, twelve-thread configuration provides a tangible advantage in workloads that are heavily parallelized and scale well with core count. While it loses the Cinebench multi-core tests by small margins (1.2% in all three versions), the Geekbench result is a significant outlier in its favor. For users who run multi-threaded applications such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific simulations that are optimized for core scaling, the 9750HF may offer better performance despite being based on the older 14 nm Coffee Lake architecture. Its higher 45 W TDP also suggests it is designed for sustained multi-core loads in larger laptops with better cooling.