Intel Core i7-1195G7 vs Intel Core i7-7740X Comparison

The Intel Core i7-7740X and Intel Core i7-1195G7 are both 4-core, 8-thread processors, but they target entirely different segments of the market. The 7740X is a desktop part built for the X-Series platform, while the 1195G7 is a mobile processor designed for thin-and-light laptops. The benchmark data reveals a clear split: the 1195G7 dominates in every Cinebench test, while the 7740X wins decisively in Geekbench multi-core and edges out a small single-core victory. This creates a nuanced picture where the "better" processor depends entirely on which benchmark suite you trust.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-1195G7 claims victory in six of the eight head-to-head benchmarks, making it the clear winner in rendering and compute workloads that use Cinebench. Its margin is remarkably consistent across all six Cinebench tests, with a delta of approximately 6.3% in every case. This includes both single-core and multi-core tests, suggesting that the 1195G7’s architectural efficiency gives it a uniform advantage in this particular workload family. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 1195G7 scores 8803 against the 7740X’s 8250, a 6.3% lead that carries through to single-core where it scores 1242 versus 1164.

The Intel Core i7-7740X, however, wins the Geekbench suite outright. Its multi-core score of 5246 versus 4248 represents a 23.5% advantage, a massive margin that dwarfs the 1195G7’s Cinebench wins. The single-core Geekbench result is closer, with the 7740X scoring 1619 against 1584, a 2.2% lead. This split suggests that the 7740X has a significant edge in the types of workloads Geekbench measures, particularly in multi-threaded scenarios where its higher base clock and quad-channel memory support likely come into play. Users prioritizing Geekbench scores should favor the 7740X, while those relying on Cinebench for content creation will find the 1195G7 consistently faster.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is substantial, reflecting their different release dates and target platforms. The 7740X uses the Kaby Lake architecture, specifically the Kaby Lake-X variant, built on Intel’s 14 nm process node. It features 4 cores and 8 threads with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, paired with a 112 W TDP. The 1195G7, in contrast, uses the Tiger Lake architecture (Tiger Lake-U) on a 10 nm process node, with a much lower 2.90 GHz base clock but a significantly higher 5.00 GHz boost clock, all within a 28 W TDP envelope.

Cache configurations also differ markedly. The 7740X offers 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The 1195G7 provides 80 KB of L1 per core and a much larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core, plus 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size for the 1195G7 is listed at 144 mm², while no die size is provided for the 7740X. Memory support diverges as well: the 7740X supports DDR4 with a quad-channel memory bus, while the 1195G7 supports DDR4, LPDDR4, and LPDDR4X with a dual-channel bus. The 1195G7 also includes integrated Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 with 96 execution units, whereas the 7740X has no integrated graphics listed. PCIe generations differ, with the 7740X using Gen 3 and the 1195G7 using Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench results are uniform, with the 1195G7 winning every test by nearly the same margin. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 1195G7 scores 887 against 831, a 6.3% lead. The single-core R15 test shows 125 versus 117, a 6.4% margin. Moving to Cinebench R20, multi-core results are 3697 for the 1195G7 and 3465 for the 7740X, again a 6.3% delta; single-core is 521 against 488, also 6.3%. Cinebench R23 repeats the pattern with multi-core scores of 8803 versus 8250 and single-core scores of 1242 versus 1164, both showing a 6.3% advantage for the 1195G7. This consistency across three Cinebench versions indicates a stable architectural advantage for the Tiger Lake part in these workloads.

The Geekbench results tell a completely different story. In Geekbench multi-core, the 7740X scores 5246 against 4248, a 23.5% victory that is the largest margin of any benchmark in this comparison. This is a massive gap that likely reflects the 7740X’s higher sustained clock speeds and quad-channel memory bandwidth, which benefit multi-threaded Geekbench tests. The single-core Geekbench test is much tighter, with the 7740X winning 1619 to 1584, a 2.2% edge. While the 1195G7 wins the majority of benchmarks, the 7740X’s Geekbench multi-core dominance is so pronounced that it cannot be ignored when selecting a processor for workloads that resemble those tests.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The 7740X has a base clock of 4.30 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the 1195G7 has a 2.90 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. TDP is dramatically different: 112 W for the 7740X versus 28 W for the 1195G7. The 7740X uses the Intel Socket 2066, while the 1195G7 uses Intel BGA 1449. The process nodes differ (14 nm versus 10 nm), as do the architectures (Kaby Lake versus Tiger Lake) and codenames (Kaby Lake-X versus Tiger Lake-U). Generations are listed as Core i7 (X-Series 7th Gen) for the 7740X and Core i7 (Willow Cove-U) for the 1195G7.

Cache sizes differ in every level: L1 is 64 KB per core for the 7740X versus 80 KB per core for the 1195G7; L2 is 256 KB per core versus 1.25 MB per core; L3 is 8 MB shared versus 12 MB shared. Memory support shows the 7740X limited to DDR4 with a quad-channel bus, while the 1195G7 supports DDR4, LPDDR4, and LPDDR4X with a dual-channel bus. PCIe generation is Gen 3 for the 7740X and Gen 4 for the 1195G7, with the latter explicitly listing 16 lanes for the CPU. The 1195G7 includes integrated Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 96EU, while the 7740X has no integrated graphics. The 7740X has an unlocked multiplier; the 1195G7 does not. The 7740X’s market segment is Desktop, while the 1195G7 is Mobile. Production status also differs: the 7740X is Active, while the 1195G7 is End-of-life. The 1195G7 has a launch MSRP of $426 and a part number of SRKSC; no MSRP or part number is listed for the 7740X.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-1195G7 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, compared to the 4.60 GHz boost clock of the Intel Core i7-7740X.

Q: How much faster is the 1195G7 in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The 1195G7 scores 8803 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the 7740X scores 8250, giving the 1195G7 a 6.3% advantage.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two in any benchmark?

A: The largest gap is in Geekbench multi-core, where the 7740X scores 5246 against 4248 for the 1195G7, a 23.5% lead for the 7740X.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The 7740X supports DDR4 with a quad-channel bus, while the 1195G7 supports DDR4, LPDDR4, and LPDDR4X with a dual-channel bus.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The 1195G7 includes Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 with 96 execution units, while the 7740X has no integrated graphics listed.

Q: How do the TDPs compare?

A: The 7740X has a TDP of 112 W, while the 1195G7 has a TDP of 28 W, making the 1195G7 significantly more power-efficient.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear choice based on workload priorities. The Intel Core i7-1195G7 is the superior processor for Cinebench-based rendering tasks, winning all six Cinebench tests with a consistent 6.3% margin. Its 10 nm architecture, larger cache hierarchy (12 MB L3 versus 8 MB), and higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz contribute to these wins. It also offers integrated graphics, Gen 4 PCIe support, and a dramatically lower 28 W TDP, making it suitable for mobile systems where power efficiency matters. The 1195G7’s average benchmark score of 2638 places it at the 49th percentile of all CPUs, just below its rival.

The Intel Core i7-7740X, however, is the clear winner in Geekbench, particularly in multi-core where its 23.5% advantage is the largest margin in the comparison. Its 4.30 GHz base clock, quad-channel DDR4 memory support, and unlocked multiplier make it a compelling choice for desktop users who prioritize Geekbench scores or who plan to overclock. The 7740X’s average benchmark score of 2648 places it at the 50th percentile, with its nearest rival being the Xeon E-2274G at a 0.2% delta. For users who trust Geekbench as their primary metric, the 7740X’s 5246 multi-core score is unmatched by the 1195G7’s 4248.

The production statuses also matter: the 7740X is listed as Active, while the 1195G7 is End-of-life. This suggests the 7740X remains available for new builds, whereas the 1195G7 may be harder to source going forward. Ultimately, the 1195G7 is the better choice for Cinebench-based content creation and mobile computing, while the 7740X is preferable for Geekbench-heavy workloads and desktop systems where its higher TDP and unlocked multiplier are advantages. The 1195G7 wins the majority of benchmarks, but the 7740X’s Geekbench multi-core dominance ensures it remains relevant for specific use cases.