Intel Core i7-1185G7E vs Intel Core i7-1365UE Comparison

The Intel Core i7-1365UE is the clear benchmark victor over the Intel Core i7-1185G7E, winning all six head-to-head comparisons by a remarkably consistent margin of roughly 10%. The data shows a complete sweep, with the newer Raptor Lake part outperforming the older Tiger Lake chip across every single-core and multi-core workload in the Cinebench suite, making the performance hierarchy unambiguous despite both processors sharing a 15W TDP and the 50th percentile ranking among all CPUs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-1365UE dominates every benchmark comparison, with its smallest victory being a 9.9% lead in Cinebench R15 single-core. In that test, the 1365UE scores 131 points against the 1185G7E's 118 points. The consistency of the performance gap is striking—across all six tests, the deltaPct hovers between -9.9% and -10.3%, indicating that the architectural advantages of Raptor Lake translate uniformly across both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads, rather than favoring one scenario over another.

Multi-core performance tells the same story with slightly larger margins. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the 1365UE posts 932 versus 836 for the 1185G7E, a 10.3% advantage. The gap widens in absolute terms as the workload scales: Cinebench R20 multi-core shows 3887 against 3487, while Cinebench R23 multi-core delivers 9257 versus 8303. These results indicate that the 1365UE's additional cores and threads—10 cores and 12 threads against 4 cores and 8 threads—translate into real, measurable multi-threaded gains, not just theoretical headroom.

Single-core performance follows the same pattern. The 1365UE scores 548 in Cinebench R20 single-core versus 492 for the 1185G7E, and 1306 in Cinebench R23 single-core against 1172. Even with a lower base clock of 1700 MHz compared to 1800 MHz, the 1365UE's higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz against 4.40 GHz helps it pull ahead in latency-sensitive tasks. The result is a processor that is consistently faster in every scenario tested, from brief single-threaded bursts to sustained multi-core rendering.

The average benchmark scores reflect this overall dominance, though the gap narrows slightly. The 1185G7E averages 2703 across its benchmark set, while the 1365UE averages 2677—a counterintuitive result given the head-to-head sweep. This discrepancy stems from the different benchmark suites used for each CPU; the 1185G7E includes Geekbench scores (5459 multi-core, 1756 single-core) that are not present in the 1365UE's data set, which only includes Cinebench results. When comparing only the shared Cinebench tests, the 1365UE is ahead in every single one.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-1365UE boosts to 4.90 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-1185G7E reaches only 4.40 GHz. This 0.50 GHz advantage helps explain the 1365UE's consistent single-core wins.

Q: How much faster is the 1365UE in multi-core workloads?

A: Across the three Cinebench multi-core tests (R15, R20, R23), the 1365UE is consistently about 10.3% faster than the 1185G7E. The absolute deltas are 96 points in R15, 400 points in R20, and 954 points in R23.

Q: Do both processors use the same process node?

A: Yes, both are built on Intel's 10 nm process. However, the 1185G7E uses the Tiger Lake architecture (Willow Cove cores), while the 1365UE uses Raptor Lake architecture, which is the newer design.

Q: What is the core and thread count difference?

A: The 1185G7E has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the 1365UE has 10 cores and 12 threads. This substantial increase in parallel resources gives the 1365UE its multi-core edge.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The 1185G7E has a higher average benchmark score of 2703 compared to 2677 for the 1365UE. This is because the 1185G7E's benchmark set includes Geekbench results, which are not available for the 1365UE; in the shared Cinebench tests, the 1365UE wins every time.

Q: Do the processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The 1185G7E supports DDR4 and LPDDR4X, while the 1365UE supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different generations of Intel mobile silicon. The 1185G7E is built on the Tiger Lake architecture with Willow Cove cores, while the 1365UE uses Raptor Lake with Raptor Cove cores. Both are manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process, so the performance difference comes from microarchitectural improvements and core count rather than process shrinks. The die size also differs—the 1185G7E measures 144 mm², while the 1365UE's die size is not specified in the data.

Cache configurations are identical between the two: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. This means the 1365UE's advantage in multi-threaded tasks comes from its additional cores rather than a larger shared cache pool. The 1365UE's 10 cores are split into a hybrid arrangement (the data indicates 10 cores and 12 threads, implying 2 of the cores do not have hyper-threading), which is a defining feature of Raptor Lake that Tiger Lake does not share.

Memory support diverges significantly. The 1185G7E is limited to DDR4 and LPDDR4X, while the 1365UE adds DDR5 support, offering newer and potentially faster memory options. PCIe connectivity also improves: the 1185G7E provides Gen 4 with 4 lanes (CPU only), whereas the 1365UE doubles that to 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well, with the 1185G7E featuring Iris Xe-LP Graphics G7 with 96 execution units, while the 1365UE has Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units—a downgrade in EU count that may offset some of the CPU gains in GPU-bound tasks.

The socket changes from Intel BGA 1449 on the 1185G7E to Intel BGA 1744 on the 1365UE, meaning they are not drop-in compatible. The 1185G7E launched in September 2020 with a launch MSRP of $431, while the 1365UE launched in January 2023 with no MSRP provided in the data. Both are mobile processors with a 15W TDP and are currently marked as Active in production status.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-1365UE wins every single benchmark comparison against the Intel Core i7-1185G7E. If you are choosing between these two based purely on processing performance, the 1365UE is the correct pick. It is approximately 10% faster in all Cinebench tests, both single-core and multi-core, which translates to real-world improvements in rendering, compilation, and general responsiveness.

The 1185G7E does have some redeeming qualities that keep it competitive in specific scenarios. Its integrated graphics with 96 execution units outnumber the 1365UE's 80 EUs, which could make it more capable in GPU-accelerated workloads that rely on the iGPU. It also carries a lower launch MSRP of $431, though the 1365UE has no listed MSRP to compare directly. However, for pure CPU-bound tasks, the 1365UE's 10 cores and 12 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads provide a structural advantage that no amount of software optimization can overcome.

The 1365UE's higher boost clock of 4.90 GHz against 4.40 GHz gives it an edge in latency-sensitive applications, while its support for DDR5 memory and double the PCIe Gen 4 lanes make it the more future-proof platform. The 1185G7E's only clear wins are in GPU execution units and the availability of a launch price. For most users, the performance sweep is decisive.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. The 1185G7E has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the 1365UE has 10 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are close—1800 MHz for the 1185G7E versus 1700 MHz for the 1365UE—but the boost clocks diverge significantly at 4.40 GHz and 4.90 GHz respectively. Both have a 15W TDP, but they use different sockets: BGA 1449 for the 1185G7E and BGA 1744 for the 1365UE.

Architecture and codename differ: Tiger Lake (Tiger Lake-U) versus Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake-U). The process node is the same at 10 nm, and the die size is 144 mm² for the 1185G7E, with no die size listed for the 1365UE. Memory support is broader on the 1365UE, which accepts DDR4 and DDR5, while the 1185G7E is limited to DDR4 and LPDDR4X. PCIe lanes double from 4 to 8 on the 1365UE, both Gen 4. Integrated graphics favor the 1185G7E with 96 EUs versus 80 EUs on the 1365UE.

Other differences include the release date (September 2020 for the 1185G7E, January 2023 for the 1365UE), the launch MSRP ($431 for the 1185G7E only), and the part number (SRK0X for the 1185G7E, none listed for the 1365UE). Cache sizes are identical across both: 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-1365UE wins every CPU benchmark in the comparison, making it the obvious choice for compute-heavy tasks. Its 10-core, 12-thread configuration provides substantial multi-threaded horsepower for workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation, where it consistently outperforms the 1185G7E by about 10.3% in Cinebench multi-core tests. Its higher 4.90 GHz boost clock also makes it preferable for single-threaded applications such as legacy software, office productivity, and light gaming, where it holds a consistent 9.9-10.3% lead.

The Intel Core i7-1185G7E does have niche advantages. Its integrated graphics with 96 execution units surpass the 1365UE's 80 EUs, so in scenarios where the discrete GPU is unavailable or disabled, the 1185G7E may deliver better iGPU performance. It also has a longer track record, having launched in 2020 versus 2023, which may mean more mature driver and software support in certain enterprise environments. For systems that require the older BGA 1449 socket or are constrained to DDR4/LPDDR4X memory, the 1185G7E remains a viable option.

The data also shows that the 1185G7E has a higher average benchmark score (2703 versus 2677) and ranks alongside the Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 in its nearest rivals, while the 1365UE sits near the Intel Core i5-9500F. However, these aggregate scores are misleading due to different benchmark sets. In the tests they share, the 1365UE is faster every time. For any workload that can leverage multiple cores or higher boost clocks, the 1365UE is the superior processor. The 1185G7E only wins where iGPU execution units or legacy platform compatibility are the deciding factors.