Intel Core i7-11850H vs Intel Core i7-1360P Comparison

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two mobile processors by workload type. The Intel Core i7-11850H is the stronger all-around performer for sustained multi-core tasks, winning 10 of 17 head-to-head benchmarks, including the most demanding Cinebench R23 multi-core test by a substantial 32.4% margin. Its larger 24 MB shared L3 cache and higher 35W TDP allow it to maintain higher throughput in long-running workloads. However, the Intel Core i7-1360P is the better choice for single-thread responsiveness and short-burst tasks; it wins the PassMark single-thread test by 12.8% and dominates the physics simulation workload by 34.2%. The choice depends on whether sustained multi-core rendering or snappy single-core reaction matters more. For users running heavy video exports, data compression, or extended instruction workloads, the i7-11850H is the data-backed pick. For users prioritizing fast UI response, floating-point calculations, or encryption, the i7-1360P offers measurable advantages. The i7-11850H also holds a higher overall benchmark average (24935 versus 24344) and a slightly better percentile ranking (77th versus 76th), reinforcing its status as the more capable processor in aggregate.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel design generations and use different core configurations. The Intel Core i7-1360P is built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-P codename, while the Intel Core i7-11850H uses the older Tiger Lake architecture with the Tiger Lake-H codename. Both are fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node, but the i7-1360P uses a hybrid core layout with 12 total cores and 16 threads, whereas the i7-11850H uses a conventional layout with 8 cores and 16 threads. This means the i7-1360P has 50% more physical cores, a structural advantage for parallel workloads, but the i7-11850H compensates with a larger shared L3 cache of 24 MB compared to 18 MB on the i7-1360P. The per-core L2 cache also differs: the i7-1360P has 2 MB per core, while the i7-11850H has 1.25 MB per core. Both processors have the same L1 cache of 80 KB per core. The socket types differ as well: the i7-1360P uses Intel BGA 1744, and the i7-11850H uses Intel BGA 1787. The integrated graphics also differ, with the i7-1360P featuring Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and the i7-11850H featuring UHD Graphics 750. Memory support is another separation point: the i7-1360P supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the i7-11850H supports only DDR4. Both are dual-channel, but the i7-11850H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is recorded for the i7-1360P. The i7-11850H has a die size of 190 mm², while the i7-1360P has no die size recorded. Both processors use PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), and neither supports ECC memory nor has an unlocked multiplier. The release dates differ significantly: the i7-11850H launched in May 2021, and the i7-1360P launched in January 2023, a gap of roughly a year and a half.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a clear split between the two processors. In Cinebench R15, the i7-1360P wins both tests: multi-core by 10.6% (1858 versus 1680) and single-core by 8.9% (258 versus 237). This suggests that in the older Cinebench R15 version, the newer architecture and higher boost clock of the i7-1360P deliver notable gains. The i7-1360P boosts up to 5.00 GHz compared to 4.80 GHz on the i7-11850H, which explains its single-core advantage in R15. However, the trend reverses in Cinebench R20 and R23. The i7-11850H wins Cinebench R20 multi-core by 6.7% (7002 versus 6530) and single-core by 6.8% (988 versus 921). In Cinebench R23, the i7-11850H's dominance becomes more pronounced: it wins multi-core by 32.4% (16673 versus 11266.5) and single-core by 22.3% (2353 versus 1829). The R23 multi-core result is the single largest performance gap in the entire comparison, indicating that the i7-11850H's higher sustained power envelope and larger cache give it a massive edge in modern rendering workloads.

PassMark results show a similar pattern. The i7-11850H wins data compression by 14% (236949 versus 203746), extended instructions by 26.6% (15788 versus 11581), prime number finding by 10.3% (87 versus 78), integer math by 5.6% (71996 versus 67963), multithread by 7.1% (20059 versus 18632), and random string sorting by 20.7% (28395 versus 22522). These are substantial wins in memory-intensive and integer-heavy tasks. Conversely, the i7-1360P wins data encryption by 2% (12463 versus 12214), floating point math by 8.1% (45997 versus 42540), physics by 34.2% (1280 versus 954), and single-thread by 12.8% (3461 versus 3069). The physics win is particularly striking: the i7-1360P scores 1280 versus 954, a 34.2% advantage that suggests its core layout and clock speed are highly effective for physics simulation engines. The single-thread advantage of 12.8% is also notable, as the i7-1360P's 3461 score versus 3069 indicates faster per-core execution in PassMark's single-threaded tests.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The i7-1360P has 12 cores versus 8 cores on the i7-11850H, while both have 16 threads. The base clock is slightly higher on the i7-1360P at 2.20 GHz versus 2.10 GHz, and the boost clock is also higher at 5.00 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. The TDP is notably different: the i7-1360P is rated at 28W, while the i7-11850H is rated at 35W, a 25% higher thermal envelope for the older chip. The socket differs (BGA 1744 versus BGA 1787), as do the architecture names (Raptor Lake versus Tiger Lake) and codenames (Raptor Lake-P versus Tiger Lake-H). The process node is the same 10 nm from Intel for both. The L2 cache per core differs (2 MB versus 1.25 MB), and the L3 cache differs (18 MB shared versus 24 MB shared). Memory support differs (DDR4 and DDR5 versus DDR4 only), and the integrated graphics differ (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU versus UHD Graphics 750). The i7-11850H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s and a die size of 190 mm², neither of which is recorded for the i7-1360P. The release dates differ (January 2023 versus May 2021), and the part numbers differ (SRMJ8 versus SRKT4). Both processors are mobile segments, active production status, non-unlocked multipliers, and use PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is better for single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-1360P wins the PassMark single-thread test by 12.8% (3461 versus 3069) and also wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 8.9% (258 versus 237). However, the i7-11850H wins Cinebench R20 single-core by 6.8% (988 versus 921) and Cinebench R23 single-core by 22.3% (2353 versus 1829), so the result depends on the benchmark version.

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i7-1360P has 12 cores, while the Intel Core i7-11850H has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-11850H has a larger shared L3 cache of 24 MB, compared to 18 MB on the Intel Core i7-1360P.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i7-11850H has a TDP of 35W, while the Intel Core i7-1360P has a TDP of 28W.

Q: Which processor supports DDR5 memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i7-1360P supports DDR5 memory. The Intel Core i7-11850H supports DDR4 only.

Q: Which processor has a higher overall average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-11850H has a higher average benchmark score of 24935, compared to 24344 for the Intel Core i7-1360P.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-11850H wins in sustained, multi-threaded, and memory-heavy workloads. Its 24 MB L3 cache and 35W TDP give it a commanding 32.4% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core, a 26.6% lead in extended instructions, a 20.7% lead in random string sorting, and a 14% lead in data compression. It also wins integer math, multithread, and prime number finding. This makes it the preferred processor for video rendering, large data set processing, scientific computing, and any task that runs for extended periods with heavy cache usage. The i7-11850H also wins both Cinebench R20 tests and both Cinebench R23 tests, indicating that its older architecture still delivers superior performance in modern Cinebench versions.

The Intel Core i7-1360P wins in single-thread responsiveness, floating-point math, and physics simulations. Its 12.8% lead in PassMark single-thread and 34.2% lead in physics show that its higher boost clock (5.00 GHz) and newer core design excel at latency-sensitive tasks. It also wins data encryption by 2% and floating-point math by 8.1%, making it a better fit for workloads like real-time physics engines, encryption, and brief single-core operations. Its lower TDP of 28W also suggests it can fit in thinner, more power-efficient chassis, though the data does not directly measure thermal or battery performance. For users who bounce between short tasks, run interactive applications, or need fast response times, the i7-1360P is the data-backed choice. For users who prioritize throughput in long-running compute tasks, the i7-11850H is the clear winner based on the recorded benchmark results.