Intel Core i7-11700F vs Intel Core i7-1270P Comparison

The Intel Core i7-1270P and Intel Core i7-11700F are two very different interpretations of a Core i7, targeting opposite ends of the PC spectrum. The data shows a decisive victory for the desktop 11700F in raw throughput, winning 13 of 17 head-to-head tests, but the mobile 1270P counters with important wins in single-thread Passmark, physics simulation, and prime number finding. The 11700F is the clear pick for sustained multi-core workloads, while the 1270P makes sense only for those who need its specific mobile feature set and its modest wins in a few niche tests. The 1270P is a mobile part with a 28 W TDP and integrated Iris Xe graphics; the 11700F is a 65 W desktop processor requiring a discrete GPU. Choose the 11700F for performance, the 1270P for portability.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i7-11700F is the superior processor for almost any performance-oriented task. Benchmark results indicate it leads by about 21% across every Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 test, both single-core and multi-core. In multi-core workloads, the 11700F scores 17,633 in Cinebench R23 compared to the 1270P's 13,938, a margin that will translate directly into faster rendering and compilation times. The gap widens further in Passmark data compression, where the 11700F scores 266,035 versus 184,917, a 30.5% advantage. For a desktop user building a workstation or a high-refresh gaming rig, the 11700F is the obvious choice. The 1270P is only worth selecting if the use case explicitly requires a mobile platform—it has a 28 W TDP, socket BGA 1744, and integrated Iris Xe 96EU graphics, none of which the 11700F offers. The 1270P does win decisively in Passmark physics (1,120 vs 885, a 26.6% lead) and slightly in Passmark single-thread (3,354 vs 3,262, a 2.8% lead), but those wins do not compensate for the 11700F's dominance elsewhere.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i7-11700F wins all three Cinebench multi-core tests by exactly 21%. It scores 1,777 in R15, 7,405 in R20, and 17,633 in R23, while the 1270P scores 1,404, 5,853, and 13,938 respectively.

Q: Does the 1270P have any performance advantages?

A: Yes. The 1270P wins Passmark find prime numbers (66 vs 56, a 17.9% lead), Passmark physics (1,120 vs 885, a 26.6% lead), and Passmark single-thread (3,354 vs 3,262, a 2.8% lead). It also ties in Passmark singlethread with the same scores.

Q: What are the architectural differences?

A: The 1270P uses Alder Lake on a 10 nm process with a die size of 217 mm², while the 11700F uses Rocket Lake on a 14 nm process with a 276 mm² die. The 1270P has 12 cores and 18 MB of L3 cache; the 11700F has 8 cores and 16 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the Intel Core i7-1270P has integrated graphics, featuring Iris Xe 96EU. The 11700F has no integrated graphics and requires a discrete GPU.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The 1270P supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the 11700F supports only DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and the 11700F has a listed memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the production status of each?

A: The Intel Core i7-1270P is marked as "Active" and was released on February 22, 2022. The Intel Core i7-11700F is marked as "End-of-life" and was released on March 15, 2021. The 11700F has a launch MSRP of $298.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from completely different Intel designs. The 1270P is built on Alder Lake, a hybrid architecture that uses a 10 nm process node, while the 11700F uses the older Rocket Lake architecture on a 14 nm process. The process difference is reflected in die size: the 1270P measures 217 mm² compared to the 11700F's 276 mm². Despite the smaller die, the 1270P offers more cores—12 versus 8—and a larger shared L3 cache at 18 MB versus 16 MB. Both share the same L1 cache size of 80 KB per core, but the L2 cache differs: the 1270P has 1.25 MB per core, while the 11700F has 512 KB per core. The 1270P also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the 11700F is limited to DDR4. The 11700F has an official memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s; no bandwidth figure is listed for the 1270P. The 1270P includes integrated Iris Xe 96EU graphics; the 11700F has none. Both processors use the same PCIe Gen 4 configuration with 20 lanes (CPU only), and neither supports ECC memory. The 1270P is designed for the mobile segment on socket BGA 1744, while the 11700F is a desktop part on socket 1200.

Specification Differences

The core count is the most visible split: the 1270P has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the 11700F has 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds favor the desktop part slightly—the 11700F has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, versus the 1270P's 2.20 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. Power consumption differs dramatically: the 1270P has a TDP of 28 W, while the 11700F is rated at 65 W. This aligns with their market segments—mobile versus desktop. The 1270P supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the 11700F supports only DDR4; both are dual-channel. The 1270P has integrated graphics (Iris Xe 96EU), while the 11700F has no integrated graphics. The 1270P is built on a 10 nm process with a 217 mm² die, while the 11700F uses a 14 nm process with a 276 mm² die. The 1270P has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, while the 11700F has 512 KB per core; L3 cache is 18 MB on the 1270P and 16 MB on the 11700F. The 1270P is currently active in production, while the 11700F is end-of-life. The 11700F has a launch MSRP of $298; the 1270P has no listed launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The 11700F dominates the Cinebench suite with an identical 21% lead across all six tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 1,777 against the 1270P's 1,404; in single-core, 250 versus 198. The R20 results show 7,405 versus 5,853 multi-core and 1,045 versus 826 single-core. In R23, the 11700F reaches 17,633 versus 13,938 multi-core and 2,489 versus 1,967 single-core. The Passmark suite tells a similar story, with the 11700F winning data compression (266,035 vs 184,917, a 30.5% lead), extended instructions (18,308 vs 10,575, a 42.2% lead), random string sorting (30,498 vs 20,546, a 32.6% lead), integer math (79,133 vs 63,016, a 20.4% lead), multithread (20,728 vs 16,957, an 18.2% lead), data encryption (12,563 vs 11,276, a 10.2% lead), and floating point math (46,307 vs 43,168, a 6.8% lead). The 1270P has its own bright spots: it wins Passmark physics by a commanding 26.6% (1,120 vs 885) and Passmark find prime numbers by 17.9% (66 vs 56). It also edges out the 11700F in single-thread Passmark (3,354 vs 3,262, a 2.8% lead), with the same margin in the duplicate Passmark singlethread test. The wins are lopsided—13 for the 11700F versus 4 for the 1270P—but the 1270P's single-thread and physics wins suggest it is not without merit in specific scenarios.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-11700F wins in every multi-threaded productivity scenario in the data. Its 21% lead in all Cinebench tests makes it the pick for rendering, video encoding, and any workload that scales across cores. The Passmark results reinforce this: it is 30.5% faster in data compression, 42.2% faster in extended instructions (which cover AVX and other SIMD workloads), and 32.6% faster in random string sorting. For integer math, a proxy for general computation, it holds a 20.4% lead. The 11700F also wins in data encryption and floating point math, making it the stronger choice for scientific computing and file archiving. This is a desktop CPU that expects sustained power delivery, and the benchmarks reward that design.

The Intel Core i7-1270P wins in Passmark physics by 26.6%, indicating an advantage in physics simulation tasks that may favor its hybrid core layout. It also wins Passmark find prime numbers by 17.9%, a test that often benefits from high single-thread frequency and cache behavior. Its 2.8% lead in Passmark single-thread is modest but real, suggesting slightly better per-thread performance in that specific benchmark. The 1270P also has the option of integrated Iris Xe graphics, which the 11700F lacks entirely—a decisive feature for a system without a discrete GPU. Its 28 W TDP and support for DDR5 give it a path to lower-power and newer-memory builds, though the benchmark data does not show a performance payoff for those features. For a mobile workstation or a compact system where the 11700F physically cannot fit, the 1270P is the only choice; for raw performance, the 11700F wins clearly.