Intel Core i7-11700B vs Intel Core i9-13900TE Comparison

The Intel Core i9-13900TE and Intel Core i7-11700B are both 10nm Intel parts, but they represent two completely different design philosophies and market segments. The data shows a clear, consistent victory for the i9-13900TE across every single benchmark test, yet the margins are surprisingly narrow given the generational gap and the core-count disparity. This is not a rout; it is a series of narrow, consistent wins for the newer chip.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark results are unambiguous: the Intel Core i9-13900TE wins all six Cinebench comparisons. The wins are uniform in margin, with the deltaPct hovering at 1.9% or 2.0% in every test. This consistency suggests that the performance advantage is architectural and systemic rather than workload-specific.

In Cinebench R15, the i9-13900TE scores 1861 multicore against the i7-11700B's 1826, a 1.9% lead. The single-core result is identical in margin: 262 versus 257, again a 1.9% advantage. The pattern holds in Cinebench R20, where the i9-13900TE posts 7758 multicore versus 7609 for the i7-11700B, a 2% gap, and 1094 single-core versus 1074, a 1.9% lead.

Cinebench R23, the most demanding test in the suite, tells the same story. The i9-13900TE achieves 18472 multicore, while the i7-11700B manages 18119 — a 1.9% difference. In single-core, the scores are 2607 and 2558 respectively, once again a 1.9% margin. The i9-13900TE wins all six head-to-head tests, with a 6-0 record.

The average benchmark scores reflect this tight competition. The i9-13900TE averages 5342, placing it 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900KF (5316) and 0.5% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7281 (5315). The i7-11700B averages 5241, which puts it essentially level with the Intel Core i9-10850K (5240) at a 0% deltaPct. Both CPUs sit at the 60th percentile versus all CPUs, meaning they occupy a similar overall performance tier in the database, despite the i9's edge.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two chips is vast, even though the benchmark scores are close. The Intel Core i9-13900TE is built on Raptor Lake-S, the 13th Gen desktop architecture, and uses the Intel Socket 1700. The Intel Core i7-11700B is a Tiger Lake-H part, an 11th Gen mobile architecture, soldered to Intel BGA 1787.

The core configuration is the most striking difference. The i9-13900TE packs 24 cores and 32 threads, while the i7-11700B has 8 cores and 16 threads. The i9's base clock is 1000.00 MHz, rising to 5.00 GHz boost, whereas the i7-11700B has a higher base clock of 3.20 GHz but a lower boost of 4.80 GHz. The i9 compensates for its low base clock with a massive core count and a higher boost ceiling.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. Both share 80 KB of L1 per core, but the L2 cache is 2 MB per core on the i9-13900TE versus 1.25 MB per core on the i7-11700B. The shared L3 cache is 36 MB on the i9, versus 24 MB on the i7. This gives the i9 a substantial total cache advantage, which helps feed its 24 cores.

Process node is listed as 10 nm for both, but the die sizes differ: 257 mm² for the i9-13900TE versus 190 mm² for the i7-11700B. The i9 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the i7 is limited to DDR4. The i7-11700B lists a specific memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s; the i9's bandwidth is not specified in the data. The i9 supports ECC memory; the i7 does not.

PCIe capabilities also diverge. The i9-13900TE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i7-11700B provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the i9 uses UHD Graphics 770, while the i7 uses UHD Graphics (Xe-LP). The i9 is marked Active in production, while the i7 is End-of-life.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-13900TE wins every benchmark test in the head-to-head comparison, so its advantage is universal in the Cinebench suite. It is the clear choice for multi-threaded workloads where its 24 cores and 32 threads can be utilized, even though the benchmark margins are only around 2%. Its single-core performance is also superior, making it the better option for lightly-threaded tasks as well.

The Intel Core i7-11700B, despite losing all six head-to-head tests, is not without merit. Its higher base clock of 3.20 GHz versus the i9's 1000.00 MHz suggests it may sustain performance better in power-constrained or thermally-limited scenarios, though the data provided does not include power draw or thermal benchmarks. Its 65W TDP is higher than the i9's 35W TDP, indicating a different power envelope. The i7 is a mobile part with 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which could be advantageous in compact systems where Gen 4 connectivity is sufficient.

The i7-11700B's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-10850K at a 0% deltaPct, meaning it performs on par with that older desktop flagship. The i9-13900TE's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-10900KF at 0.5% deltaPct, placing it slightly above that chip. The i7-11700B also sits just 0.6% above the Intel Core i5-13400T, showing it holds its own against a newer low-power desktop part.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900TE has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i7-11700B has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the performance gap in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The i9-13900TE scores 18472 versus 18119 for the i7-11700B, a 1.9% lead for the i9.

Q: Which processor supports DDR5 memory?

A: Only the Intel Core i9-13900TE supports DDR5; the Intel Core i7-11700B is limited to DDR4.

Q: Are these processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both are at the 60th percentile versus all CPUs, according to the benchmark database.

Q: What is the TDP of each chip?

A: The i9-13900TE has a TDP of 35W, while the i7-11700B has a TDP of 65W.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The i9-13900TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i7-11700B has 24 MB.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i9-13900TE | Intel Core i7-11700B |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 24 | 8 |

| Threads | 32 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 1000.00 MHz | 3.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 35W | 65W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1787 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-S | Tiger Lake-H |

| Generation | Core i9 (Raptor Lake) | Core i7 (Tiger Lake-H) |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 190 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 36 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | UHD Graphics (Xe-LP) |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2021-05-10 |

| Part Number | SRMG1 | SRKU5 |

The Verdict

The data points to one conclusion: the Intel Core i9-13900TE is the faster processor in every measured benchmark. It wins all six Cinebench tests, from R15 single-core to R23 multicore, with margins between 1.9% and 2%. It is the only one of the two that supports DDR5 memory, the only one with ECC support, and the only one still in active production. For any workload measured in the Cinebench suite, the i9-13900TE is the superior choice.

The Intel Core i7-11700B, however, is not a weak processor. It trails by only 1.9% in most tests, which is a narrow margin for a chip with one-third the cores and threads. Its 65W TDP is higher than the i9's 35W, but it is an end-of-life mobile part. For users constrained to a BGA 1787 platform or needing Gen 4 PCIe with 20 lanes, the i7-11700B is a capable option that performs at the same 60th percentile as the i9-13900TE.

The i9-13900TE should be the pick for anyone building a new system on Socket 1700 who wants the best Cinebench performance, DDR5 support, and ECC memory capability. The i7-11700B is the choice only for those locked into its mobile platform or who cannot use the i9's desktop socket. The benchmark data is clear: the i9-13900TE wins, but the i7-11700B remains competitive in its niche.