Intel Core i7-11390H vs Intel Core i7-1365UE Comparison

The Intel Core i7-11390H and the Intel Core i7-1365UE are both mobile processors aimed at thin and light laptops, but they represent different generations and design philosophies. The 11390H is a 4-core, 8-thread Tiger Lake-H part, while the 1365UE is a 10-core, 12-thread Raptor Lake-U part. The benchmark data shows a clear, consistent performance advantage for the newer 1365UE across every test, despite its lower thermal design power. The following analysis breaks down the head-to-head results, architectural differences, and the practical implications for a buyer.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a sweep for the Intel Core i7-1365UE in every benchmark test. The closest contest is in Cinebench R20 single-core, where the 1365UE scores 548 against the 11390H's 487, a delta of -11.1%. This pattern repeats across all six head-to-head tests, with the 1365UE winning each by a margin of roughly 11% to 11.5%.

In Cinebench R15, the 1365UE scores 932 in multi-core compared to the 11390H's 828, a difference of -11.2%. The single-core result in R15 is 131 versus 116, a delta of -11.5%, which is the largest margin in the entire comparison. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multi-core score for the 1365UE is 3887 against 3451 for the 11390H, again a -11.2% gap, while the single-core score is 548 versus 487, a -11.1% delta.

The most significant absolute difference appears in Cinebench R23. The 1365UE reaches 9257 in multi-core, while the 11390H manages 8218, a -11.2% difference. In the R23 single-core test, the scores are 1306 for the 1365UE and 1160 for the 11390H, also a -11.2% delta. The consistency of these deltas, all falling between -11.1% and -11.5%, indicates a uniform performance advantage for the 1365UE across both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. There are no benchmark wins for the 11390H; winsA is 0 and winsB is 6. The average benchmark score for the 11390H is 2715, while the 1365UE sits slightly lower at 2677, which is interesting because the 1365UE wins every head-to-head test but has a slightly lower average across all its recorded benchmarks, likely due to a different mix of tests in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations. The Intel Core i7-11390H is based on the Tiger Lake architecture, specifically Tiger Lake-H, while the Intel Core i7-1365UE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-U. Both are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel. The core counts differ substantially: the 11390H has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the 1365UE has 10 cores and 12 threads. This core advantage is a primary reason for the multi-core performance lead.

Cache configurations are identical on paper. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics differ, with the 11390H featuring Iris XE with 96 execution units, while the 1365UE has Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. Memory support also differs: the 11390H supports DDR4 only, while the 1365UE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, and the 11390H has a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is recorded for the 1365UE.

The PCIe lanes are a notable divergence. The 11390H offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the 1365UE provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This could affect connectivity options for discrete GPUs or high-speed storage. The base clocks are dramatically different as listed: the 11390H has a base clock of 2.90 GHz, while the 1365UE is listed at 1700.00 GHz, which appears to be a data entry error in the database. The boost clocks are closer, with the 11390H at 5.00 GHz and the 1365UE at 4.90 GHz. The thermal design power is also distinct: the 11390H is rated at 28 W, while the 1365UE is rated at 15 W. This makes the 1365UE a more power-efficient part on paper, which is typical for a U-series processor.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear winner for general performance: the Intel Core i7-1365UE. It wins every head-to-head benchmark by a consistent margin of about 11% to 11.5%, both in single-core and multi-core tests. This is notable because the 1365UE accomplishes this with a lower thermal design power of 15 W compared to the 11390H's 28 W. The 10-core, 12-thread configuration of the 1365UE gives it a structural advantage in multi-threaded workloads, while its single-core scores also lead, likely due to the newer Raptor Lake architecture.

The 11390H is not without merit, but its advantages are less about raw compute. It offers more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) and a higher integrated graphics execution unit count (96 vs 80). Its 5.00 GHz boost clock is slightly higher than the 1365UE's 4.90 GHz. For a user who needs more PCIe connectivity for peripherals or prefers the stronger integrated graphics for light gaming, the 11390H could still be a reasonable choice. However, for pure CPU-bound tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the 1365UE is the stronger performer according to the recorded data.

The percentile ranking for both parts is identical at 50, placing them in the middle of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals for the 11390H include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, which is 0.1% ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 4700U, which is 0.2% behind. For the 1365UE, the nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-9500F, which is 0.3% ahead, and the Intel Core i7-9700T, which is 0.4% ahead. These comparisons show that both processors are closely matched with their immediate peers in the overall ranking, despite the 1365UE's head-to-head dominance over the 11390H.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The core count is 4 for the 11390H versus 10 for the 1365UE, and the thread count is 8 versus 12. The base clock is listed as 2.90 GHz for the 11390H and 1700.00 GHz for the 1365UE, though the latter figure is likely a database anomaly; the boost clock is 5.00 GHz versus 4.90 GHz. The thermal design power is 28 W for the 11390H and 15 W for the 1365UE. The socket changes from Intel BGA 1449 to Intel BGA 1744. The architecture is Tiger Lake versus Raptor Lake, and the codename is Tiger Lake-H versus Raptor Lake-U.

Memory support is DDR4 for the 11390H and DDR4, DDR5 for the 1365UE. The memory bandwidth is recorded as 51.2 GB/s for the 11390H, with no figure for the 1365UE. The PCIe configuration is Gen 4 with 20 lanes for the 11390H and Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the 1365UE. Integrated graphics differ: Iris XE 96EU versus Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. The release dates are 2021-06-20 for the 11390H and 2023-01-03 for the 1365UE. The launch MSRP for the 11390H is $426, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the 1365UE. The die size is 146.1 mm² for the 11390H, with no die size listed for the 1365UE. Both have identical L1, L2, and L3 cache configurations.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i7-1365UE is faster in every recorded multi-core benchmark. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 9257 against the 11390H's 8218, a delta of -11.2%.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-11390H win any benchmarks?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows the 1365UE winning all six tests, including both single-core and multi-core tests in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23. The wins count is 0 for the 11390H and 6 for the 1365UE.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The 11390H has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the 1365UE has 10 cores and 12 threads. This is a significant difference that contributes to the 1365UE's multi-core performance advantage.

Q: What is the thermal design power of each processor?

A: The 11390H has a TDP of 28 W, while the 1365UE has a TDP of 15 W. The 1365UE delivers higher benchmark scores with a lower power envelope.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The 11390H supports DDR4 only, while the 1365UE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The 11390H has Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the 1365UE has Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This makes the 11390H more suitable for systems with many high-bandwidth peripherals.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-1365UE wins in all raw CPU performance categories. It is the choice for users who prioritize processing power in tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or running virtual machines. The 10-core, 12-thread design, combined with a 15 W TDP, makes it an efficient option for sustained workloads in a thin chassis. Its consistent 11% lead across all Cinebench tests means it will handle both lightly threaded applications (like web browsing or office work) and heavily threaded applications (like content creation) with more headroom than the 11390H.

The Intel Core i7-11390H, on the other hand, wins in specific connectivity and graphics scenarios. Its 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for more expansion options, such as connecting multiple NVMe drives or a discrete GPU, which the 1365UE's 8 lanes cannot match. The 11390H also has a more powerful integrated graphics unit with 96 execution units versus 80, so for users who rely heavily on the iGPU for tasks like hardware-accelerated video playback or light gaming, the 11390H is the better fit. Its higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz also gives it a slight edge in bursty, single-threaded tasks, though the benchmark data shows the 1365UE still wins in single-core tests overall. For a pure CPU performance buyer, the 1365UE is the clear pick; for a buyer who needs more PCIe lanes or better integrated graphics, the 11390H holds its ground.