Intel Core i7-10875H vs Intel Xeon E-2246G Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a clear picture: the Intel Core i7-10875H dominates the Intel Xeon E-2246G in the vast majority of head-to-head comparisons, taking 7 of 8 benchmark wins. The only exception is a notable single-core victory for the Xeon, which flips the narrative in one specific workload.

In multi-threaded rendering, the i7-10875H consistently leads by a narrow but uniform margin. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i7 scores 1233 against the Xeon's 1181, a 4.2% advantage. That same 4.2% delta appears in Cinebench R20 multicore (5138 vs 4922) and Cinebench R23 multicore (12234 vs 11720). The consistency of this gap across three generations of the Cinebench test suggests a structural advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk. The i7's 8 cores and 16 threads, compared to the Xeon's 6 cores and 12 threads, likely explain this steady multi-threaded edge.

The single-core results tell a more nuanced story. In Cinebench R15 single-core, the i7 wins again, scoring 174 versus 166, a 4.6% lead. Cinebench R20 single-core shows the i7 ahead at 725 versus 694, a 4.3% margin. Cinebench R23 single-core follows the same pattern: 1727 versus 1654, a 4.2% lead. These are consistent wins for the i7, but the margins are modest.

Then comes the outlier. In Geekbench single-core, the Xeon E-2246G scores 1613 against the i7's 1384, a commanding 16.5% victory. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison, and it runs counter to every other single-threaded result. The Xeon's higher base clock of 3.60 GHz, compared to the i7's 2.30 GHz, may play a role here, though the i7's boost clock of 5.10 GHz exceeds the Xeon's 4.80 GHz. The Geekbench workload appears to favor the Xeon's sustained clock behavior in a way that Cinebench does not.

Geekbench multicore, however, returns to the expected pattern. The i7 scores 6511 against the Xeon's 5988, an 8% advantage. This is the largest multi-threaded delta in the dataset, nearly double the Cinebench margins. The i7's additional cores and threads, combined with its larger 16 MB shared L3 cache versus the Xeon's 12 MB, likely contribute to this wider gap in Geekbench's parallel workload.

The average benchmark scores place these two processors very close overall. The Xeon E-2246G averages 3492 across all recorded tests, while the i7-10875H averages 3432. The Xeon's percentile rank of 55 versus the i7's 54 reflects this near parity. The Xeon's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-1680 v4 at 3494 (0% delta) and the Intel Core i9-9900T at 3499 (-0.2% delta). The i7's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-9880H at 3433 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS at 3444 (-0.3% delta). These rival comparisons show both processors sitting in a dense cluster of similar-performing CPUs.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-10875H is the clear choice for multi-threaded workloads. Its 8 cores and 16 threads give it a structural advantage that shows up consistently across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Geekbench multicore tests. The margins range from 4.2% to 8%, with the largest gap appearing in Geekbench multicore. For rendering, video encoding, compilation, or any task that scales across cores, the data points squarely at the i7.

The Xeon E-2246G wins in one specific scenario: Geekbench single-core. Its 16.5% lead there is substantial and cannot be dismissed as noise. The Xeon's higher base clock of 3.60 GHz, combined with its 4.80 GHz boost, appears to give it an edge in this particular single-threaded test. For workloads that resemble Geekbench's single-core pattern, the Xeon may offer better responsiveness.

The Cinebench single-core results complicate this picture. The i7 wins all three Cinebench single-core tests, albeit by narrow margins of 4.2% to 4.6%. This suggests the Xeon's Geekbench single-core victory may be workload-specific rather than a general single-threaded advantage. The i7's higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz likely helps it in bursty single-threaded scenarios, while the Xeon's sustained base clock may benefit longer single-threaded tasks.

The i7 also holds the edge in memory bandwidth, with 46.9 GB/s versus the Xeon's 42.7 GB/s. This 4.2 GB/s difference could contribute to the i7's multi-threaded wins, particularly in memory-sensitive workloads. The i7's larger 16 MB L3 cache versus the Xeon's 12 MB further supports this interpretation.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations and target different market segments. The Xeon E-2246G belongs to the Xeon E-2200 series, uses the Coffee Lake architecture, and is built for server and workstation platforms. It uses the Intel Socket 1151 and carries a 14 nm process node. The i7-10875H belongs to the Core 10th Gen series, uses the Comet Lake architecture, and targets mobile platforms. It uses the Intel BGA 1440 socket and also carries a 14 nm process node.

Core counts differ significantly. The Xeon offers 6 cores and 12 threads, while the i7 provides 8 cores and 16 threads. This 2-core, 4-thread advantage for the i7 is the most obvious architectural difference and likely drives most of the multi-threaded benchmark results.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Xeon has a base clock of 3.60 GHz, substantially higher than the i7's 2.30 GHz. The boost clocks are closer: 4.80 GHz for the Xeon versus 5.10 GHz for the i7. The Xeon's higher base clock reflects its workstation heritage, where sustained performance matters more than burst capability. The i7's lower base clock and higher boost clock reflect its mobile design, which prioritizes power efficiency during idle and burst performance when needed.

Cache configurations also differ. Both processors have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache, however, differs: the Xeon has 12 MB shared, while the i7 has 16 MB shared. This 4 MB difference could benefit the i7 in workloads with larger working sets.

Power and thermal characteristics diverge sharply. The Xeon has a TDP of 80 watts, while the i7 has a TDP of 45 watts. This 35-watt difference reflects the Xeon's workstation positioning versus the i7's mobile focus. The i7's lower TDP allows it to fit in thinner laptops, while the Xeon's higher TDP enables sustained performance in desktop workstations.

Memory support shows another key difference. Both support DDR4 and use dual-channel memory buses. The Xeon supports ECC memory, while the i7 does not. This makes the Xeon suitable for error-sensitive workloads like financial calculations or scientific computing. The i7's lack of ECC support limits it to consumer and general-purpose use cases.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The Xeon includes HD Graphics P630, while the i7 includes UHD Graphics. Both are integrated solutions, but the Xeon's P630 variant is positioned for workstation use. The die sizes also differ: the Xeon measures 154 mm², while the i7 measures 177.5 mm². The i7's larger die likely accommodates its additional cores and cache.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-10875H has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Xeon E-2246G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The i7 holds a 2-core, 4-thread advantage.

Q: How do their clock speeds compare?

A: The Xeon E-2246G has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The i7-10875H has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Xeon runs faster at base, but the i7 boosts higher.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2246G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i7-10875H does not support ECC memory. This makes the Xeon suitable for error-sensitive workstation tasks.

Q: What is the largest benchmark margin between the two?

A: The largest margin is in Geekbench single-core, where the Xeon E-2246G scores 1613 versus the i7-10875H's 1384, a 16.5% lead for the Xeon. The largest i7 margin is in Geekbench multicore, where it leads by 8%.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Xeon E-2246G has an average benchmark score of 3492, while the i7-10875H averages 3432. The Xeon's percentile rank is 55, and the i7's is 54. They sit very close in overall performance.

Q: What are their TDP ratings?

A: The Xeon E-2246G has a TDP of 80 watts, while the i7-10875H has a TDP of 45 watts. The Xeon draws more power, reflecting its workstation design, while the i7 is built for mobile efficiency.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core i7-10875H as the stronger processor for most workloads. It wins 7 of 8 head-to-head benchmarks, including all Cinebench tests and Geekbench multicore. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide a clear multi-threaded advantage, and its 5.10 GHz boost clock keeps it competitive in single-threaded tasks. The i7's 16 MB L3 cache and 46.9 GB/s memory bandwidth further support its performance profile.

The Intel Xeon E-2246G is the better choice in one specific scenario: Geekbench single-core, where it leads by 16.5%. Its higher base clock of 3.60 GHz appears to give it an edge in that particular workload. The Xeon also offers ECC memory support, which the i7 lacks, making it suitable for error-sensitive workstation applications. Its 80-watt TDP and server/workstation market segment position it for sustained, reliable operation in professional environments.

For general-purpose computing, rendering, content creation, and any workload that benefits from additional cores, the i7-10875H is the clear winner. For single-threaded tasks that resemble Geekbench's pattern, or for applications requiring ECC memory, the Xeon E-2246G has a compelling case. The i7's active production status and the Xeon's end-of-life status also factor into long-term availability considerations.

The average benchmark scores place these processors within 60 points of each other (3492 for the Xeon, 3432 for the i7), indicating that neither is dramatically faster overall. The choice ultimately depends on whether the workload favors the i7's core count and boost clock or the Xeon's base clock and ECC support.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon E-2246G | Intel Core i7-10875H |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 2.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 80 W | 45 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel BGA 1440 |

| Architecture | Coffee Lake | Comet Lake |

| Codename | Coffee Lake-S WS | Comet Lake-H |

| Generation | Xeon E (Coffee Lake) | Core i7 (Comet Lake-H) |

| Die Size | 154 mm² | 177.5 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 42.7 GB/s | 46.9 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics P630 | UHD Graphics |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2019-05-28 | 2020-04-01 |

| Launch MSRP | $311 | $450 |

| Part Number | SRF7G | SRJ8F |