Intel Core i7-10875H vs Intel Xeon D-1732TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a consistent, though narrow, advantage for the Intel Core i7-10875H across every shared benchmark. The Xeon D-1732TE does not secure a single win in the head-to-head comparisons, with the Core i7 taking all six recorded tests. The margins are remarkably uniform, which suggests a systematic clock-speed advantage rather than any architectural superiority.

In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Core i7-10875H scores 1233 against the Xeon D-1732TE's 1214, a delta of -1.5% from the Xeon's perspective. The single-core test tells a similar story: 174 versus 171, a -1.7% gap. Moving to Cinebench R20, the Core i7 posts 5138 multicore and 725 single-core, while the Xeon manages 5061 and 714 respectively, both deltas sitting at -1.5%. Cinebench R23 follows the same pattern: the Core i7 reaches 12234 multicore and 1727 single-core, against the Xeon's 12052 and 1701, again with a -1.5% delta on both tests.

The narrowness of these margins matters. A 1.5% difference in multicore workloads is within the range of run-to-run variation for many systems, but the fact that the Core i7 wins every single test, including all six Cinebench iterations, indicates the result is not random noise. The single-core advantage is slightly more pronounced in R15 (-1.7%) than in R20 and R23 (-1.5%), which aligns with the Core i7's higher boost clock. The Xeon D-1732TE boosts to 3.00 GHz, while the Core i7-10875H boosts to 5.10 GHz, a substantial gap that should produce larger deltas. That the actual benchmark differences remain so small suggests the Xeon's Ice Lake architecture extracts more work per clock cycle, partially compensating for its lower frequency ceiling.

Looking at the broader database context, both processors sit at the 54th percentile among all CPUs, meaning they land in the same performance tier overall. The Xeon D-1732TE has an average benchmark score of 3486, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i9-10900TE at 3484, a delta of just 0.1%. The Core i7-10875H averages 3432, with the Intel Core i9-9880H at 3433 as its closest neighbor, a delta of 0%. The Xeon's average is actually 54 points higher than the Core i7's, which is curious given that the Core i7 wins every head-to-head test. This discrepancy arises because the Xeon's average includes only its Cinebench results, while the Core i7's average also incorporates 3DMark and Geekbench scores, some of which may be lower relative to its Cinebench performance.

The Core i7-10875H's additional benchmark data paints a more complete picture. In 3DMark, it scores 753 single-thread, 1404 for 2 threads, 2527 for 4 threads, 4050 for 8 threads, 5104 for 16 threads, and 5081 for max threads. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads shows diminishing returns, with only a 1054-point increase when doubling thread count, which is typical for an 8-core, 16-thread part with shared cache and memory bandwidth constraints. Geekbench results show 1384 single-core and 6511 multicore, a ratio of roughly 4.7x, which is modest for a 16-thread processor and reflects the same scaling limitations.

The Xeon D-1732TE has no 3DMark or Geekbench entries in the database, limiting direct comparison to the Cinebench suite. Within those six tests, the Core i7 leads by margins between 1.5% and 1.7%. No test shows the Xeon ahead, even by a fraction. This is a clean sweep, but the practical significance is muted: a 1.5% difference in rendering benchmarks rarely translates to a perceptible difference in real-world workloads.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to the Intel Core i7-10875H as the faster processor in every measured workload. It wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, with deltas ranging from -1.5% to -1.7% when viewed from the Xeon's side. The Core i7 also carries a 45 W TDP against the Xeon's 52 W, meaning it delivers slightly better performance while drawing less power according to the specification sheets. For workloads that rely on the Cinebench family of rendering tests, the Core i7 is the clear choice.

However, the Xeon D-1732TE is not without its own arguments. Its average benchmark score across the database sits at 3486, which is 54 points higher than the Core i7's 3432 average. This is an artifact of the different test suites each processor has been subjected to, but it does indicate that the Xeon's performance profile is not uniformly inferior. The Xeon also supports ECC memory, a feature the Core i7 lacks entirely, and it runs on a triple-channel memory bus with 64.0 GB/s of bandwidth compared to the Core i7's dual-channel 46.9 GB/s. For memory-sensitive server workloads, the Xeon's platform advantages may outweigh its small deficit in raw CPU benchmarks.

The production status of both parts is Active, so neither is a dead end for new designs. The Xeon launched later, with a release date in 2022 compared to the Core i7's 2020 debut, and it uses a more advanced 10 nm process node versus the Core i7's 14 nm. The launch MSRP for the Xeon is $730, while the Core i7 carries a launch MSRP of $450. These are the only pricing figures in the database, and they should be weighed against the Xeon's server-oriented features.

For a pure performance-per-watt comparison, the Core i7 wins: it is faster in all six shared benchmarks and consumes 7 W less according to the TDP figures. For a server or workstation deployment where ECC memory and higher memory bandwidth are non-negotiable, the Xeon D-1732TE is the only one of the two that qualifies. The data does not support calling the Xeon faster, but it does support calling it more suitable for certain enterprise contexts.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-10875H wins on raw compute in every recorded head-to-head benchmark. Its highest margin comes in Cinebench R15 single-core, where it leads by 1.7%, and it holds a 1.5% lead in all other shared tests. The Core i7's 5.10 GHz boost clock, against the Xeon's 3.00 GHz, gives it a clear advantage in lightly threaded workloads where single-core speed dominates. Its 45 W TDP also makes it the more power-efficient choice on paper, which matters for mobile deployments where thermal headroom is limited. The Core i7 includes integrated UHD Graphics, so it can drive a display without a discrete GPU, a capability the Xeon lacks entirely.

The Intel Xeon D-1732TE wins on platform features rather than benchmark scores. It supports ECC memory, which the Core i7 does not, making it the only viable choice for error-correcting memory configurations. Its triple-channel memory bus delivers 64.0 GB/s of bandwidth, 36% more than the Core i7's 46.9 GB/s, which benefits workloads that stream large datasets. The Xeon also uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Core i7 is limited to PCIe Gen 3 with the same lane count. The Xeon's Ice Lake architecture on a 10 nm node represents a newer fabrication process, and its larger L2 cache at 1.25 MB per core versus the Core i7's 256 KB per core suggests better cache behavior for certain access patterns. The Xeon's launch MSRP of $730 reflects its server positioning, though the database does not include pricing details beyond that figure.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Intel Core i7-10875H scores 12234, while the Intel Xeon D-1732TE scores 12052, a 1.5% advantage for the Core i7.

Q: Does the Xeon D-1732TE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Xeon D-1732TE has ECC memory support. The Intel Core i7-10875H does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-10875H has a TDP of 45 W, while the Intel Xeon D-1732TE has a TDP of 52 W.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1732TE has a triple-channel memory bus with 64.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i7-10875H uses a dual-channel bus with 46.9 GB/s.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Xeon D-1732TE has an average benchmark score of 3486, and the Intel Core i7-10875H has an average of 3432. Both sit at the 54th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Do both processors have the same core and thread counts?

A: Yes, both have 8 cores and 16 threads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural families. The Intel Xeon D-1732TE uses the Ice Lake architecture, specifically the Ice Lake-D variant, fabricated on a 10 nm process node. The Intel Core i7-10875H uses the Comet Lake architecture, specifically Comet Lake-H, on a 14 nm process node. Both are manufactured by Intel, but the process node difference gives the Xeon a density and efficiency advantage on paper.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The Xeon D-1732TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 15 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i7-10875H has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The Xeon's L2 cache is nearly five times larger per core, which can reduce latency for frequently accessed data, while the Core i7's L3 is 1 MB larger overall.

Memory architecture is another dividing line. The Xeon supports triple-channel DDR4 memory with 64.0 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC support. The Core i7 supports dual-channel DDR4 with 46.9 GB/s and no ECC. PCIe connectivity also differs: the Xeon provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Core i7 provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The Xeon has no integrated graphics, while the Core i7 includes UHD Graphics. The Xeon's die size is not recorded in the database, while the Core i7 has a die size of 177.5 mm².

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded specifications. The Xeon D-1732TE has a base clock of 1900.00 MHz and a boost clock of 3.00 GHz. The Core i7-10875H has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Xeon's TDP is 52 W, while the Core i7's is 45 W.

Sockets are not interchangeable: the Xeon uses Intel BGA 2227, and the Core i7 uses Intel BGA 1440. The Xeon targets the Server/Workstation market segment, while the Core i7 targets Mobile. The Xeon's release date is recorded as 2022, while the Core i7's is 2020. The Xeon carries a launch MSRP of $730, and the Core i7 carries a launch MSRP of $450. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Their part numbers are SRLBW for the Xeon and SRJ8F for the Core i7. The Xeon's series is not listed, while the Core i7 belongs to the Core 10th Gen series.