Intel Core i7-10875H vs Intel Core i7-9700F Comparison

Intel Core i7-9700F vs Intel Core i7-10875H

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark comparisons in the database?

A: The Intel Core i7-10875H wins 6 of the 8 head-to-head benchmark tests, while the Intel Core i7-9700F wins only 2.

Q: Are both processors based on the same manufacturing process?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i7-9700F and the Intel Core i7-10875H are built on Intel's 14 nm process node.

Q: Does the Intel Core i7-10875H support more threads than the Intel Core i7-9700F?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-10875H has 16 threads with 8 cores, while the Intel Core i7-9700F has 8 threads with 8 cores.

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core score in Geekbench?

A: The Intel Core i7-9700F scores 1509 in Geekbench single-core, which is 9% higher than the Intel Core i7-10875H's 1384.

Q: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, what is the score difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i7-10875H scores 12234, which is 8.6% ahead of the Intel Core i7-9700F's 11176.

Q: Which processor has a larger shared L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-10875H has 16 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core i7-9700F has 12 MB.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i7-9700F belongs to the Coffee Lake Refresh generation, using the Coffee Lake architecture, while the Intel Core i7-10875H is part of the Core 10th Gen series, built on Comet Lake-H architecture. Both use the same 14 nm process node from Intel, but their physical designs differ: the 9700F has a die size of 180.3 mm², while the 10875H has a slightly smaller die at 177.5 mm². The 9700F is a desktop part with an Intel Socket 1151, whereas the 10875H is a mobile processor using Intel BGA 1440. The 9700F lacks integrated graphics, but the 10875H includes UHD Graphics.

The core counts are identical at 8, but the 10875H doubles the thread count to 16 via Hyper-Threading, whereas the 9700F runs 8 threads. The base clock differs significantly: the 9700F starts at 3.00 GHz, while the 10875H has a lower 2.30 GHz base. However, the 10875H boosts higher to 5.10 GHz, compared to the 9700F's 4.70 GHz boost. The 10875H also has a larger shared L3 cache of 16 MB versus 12 MB on the 9700F. Both support DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode, but the 10875H has a higher memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s for the 9700F. The 10875H carries a TDP of 45W, while the 9700F has a higher 65W TDP. Both use PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes, and neither has ECC memory support. The 9700F is marked as end-of-life production, while the 10875H remains active.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the Intel Core i7-10875H for multi-threaded workloads. It wins all three Cinebench multi-core tests (R15, R20, R23) with consistent margins around 8.6-8.7% over the 9700F. It also wins every single-core Cinebench test by roughly 9%. The 10875H delivers these results despite a lower base clock, relying on its higher boost clock and additional threads. For users who prioritize rendering, video encoding, or any heavily threaded task, the 10875H is the stronger choice from the recorded measurements.

The Intel Core i7-9700F, however, wins in Geekbench. It scores 4.5% higher in multi-core and 9% higher in single-core compared to the 10875H. This suggests that in certain workloads that are not purely Cinebench-style, the 9700F's higher base clock and desktop-oriented design can produce better raw performance. The 9700F also has a lower TDP in terms of power draw per the spec sheet, though that is not a direct performance metric.

For a desktop user with a fixed Socket 1151 motherboard, the 9700F is the only compatible option here. For a laptop buyer, the 10875H is the mobile part that fits BGA 1440. The verdict depends on the platform: if you need a mobile processor, the 10875H is the clear winner in most benchmarks. If you are on a desktop and require maximum Geekbench scores, the 9700F leads. The 10875H also offers integrated graphics, which the 9700F lacks, making it more versatile for systems without a discrete GPU.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The 10875H has 16 threads versus 8 threads on the 9700F, doubling its parallel capacity. The base clock is 2.30 GHz on the 10875H versus 3.00 GHz on the 9700F, but the boost clock is 5.10 GHz versus 4.70 GHz, giving the 10875H a higher ceiling. The L3 cache is 16 MB on the 10875H versus 12 MB on the 9700F. Memory bandwidth is 46.9 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s. The TDP is 45W versus 65W. The socket differs: BGA 1440 versus Socket 1151. The die size is 177.5 mm² versus 180.3 mm². The 10875H includes UHD Graphics, while the 9700F has no integrated graphics. The 9700F is from Coffee Lake Refresh, the 10875H from Comet Lake-H. The 9700F was released in April 2019, the 10875H in April 2020. The 9700F is end-of-life, the 10875H is active. The 9700F has a launch MSRP of $333, the 10875H has a launch MSRP of $450.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-10875H dominates the Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 1233 versus 1126 for the 9700F, a delta of -8.7% (meaning the 10875H leads by 8.7% of the 9700F's score). In R15 single-core, the 10875H scores 174 versus 158, a 9.2% lead. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the 10875H scores 5138 versus 4693, again an 8.7% lead. In R20 single-core, it scores 725 versus 662, an 8.7% lead. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the 10875H scores 12234 versus 11176, an 8.6% lead. In R23 single-core, it scores 1727 versus 1577, an 8.7% lead. These results show that the 10875H holds a near-uniform advantage across all Cinebench versions, suggesting a consistent architectural benefit in this rendering workload.

The Intel Core i7-9700F wins both Geekbench tests. In Geekbench multi-core, the 9700F scores 6807 versus 6511 for the 10875H, a 4.5% lead. In Geekbench single-core, the 9700F scores 1509 versus 1384, a 9% lead. These wins are notable because they reverse the trend seen in Cinebench, indicating that the 9700F's higher base clock (3.00 GHz versus 2.30 GHz) helps in workloads that respond to sustained frequency rather than boost capability. The 9700F's lower thread count does not hurt it in Geekbench, where the 10875H's extra threads do not translate into a win.

The overall benchmark average scores are close: the 9700F averages 3464, while the 10875H averages 3432. The nearest rival for the 9700F is the Intel Xeon E-2186G with a delta of 0.1%, and for the 10875H it is the Intel Core i9-9880H with a delta of 0%. Both processors sit at the 54th percentile of all CPUs in the database, meaning they perform similarly on an aggregate basis.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-10875H wins in every Cinebench test, which is a strong indicator for multi-threaded rendering tasks such as 3D modeling, video editing, and software compilation. Its 16 threads give it a clear advantage in heavily parallelized workloads, and its higher boost clock (5.10 GHz) helps in single-threaded Cinebench tests as well. The 10875H also has a larger L3 cache (16 MB) and higher memory bandwidth (46.9 GB/s), which can benefit data-intensive applications. It also includes integrated graphics, making it suitable for systems without a dedicated GPU, and its lower TDP (45W) makes it viable for thinner laptops.

The Intel Core i7-9700F wins in Geekbench, which is often used to simulate real-world application performance including web browsing, office productivity, and some gaming scenarios. Its higher base clock of 3.00 GHz provides strong baseline performance, and its single-core Geekbench score (1509) is 9% higher than the 10875H's 1384. The 9700F also wins in Geekbench multi-core despite having half the threads, suggesting that its architecture handles this workload more efficiently. For desktop users with a Socket 1151 motherboard, the 9700F is the only option of the two, and its end-of-life status may be acceptable for those seeking a specific legacy platform. The 9700F's higher TDP (65W) allows for sustained power delivery in a desktop chassis, which may contribute to its Geekbench performance.