Intel Core i7-10700KF vs Intel Core i9-11900T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data between the Intel Core i9-11900T and the Intel Core i7-10700KF is unusually lopsided in one direction, but the single most decisive result actually favors the other chip. Across eight recorded benchmark comparisons, the i9-11900T claims seven wins, while the i7-10700KF takes only one. That one win, however, is a significant one in Geekbench multicore, where the 10700KF scores 9338 against 8257 for the 11900T, a delta of -11.6% from the perspective of the i9. This is the largest margin in either direction across the entire comparison.

In the Cinebench suite, the i9-11900T leads consistently, though by narrow margins. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i9 scores 1572 versus 1566 for the i7, a 0.4% advantage. The single-core R15 result is a dead heat at 221 points each, though the database assigns the win to the i9-11900T based on the recorded delta of 0. In Cinebench R20 multicore, the i9 posts 6550 against 6528, a 0.3% lead. The R20 single-core test shows 924 versus 921, again a 0.3% edge for the i9. Cinebench R23 multicore follows the same pattern: 15596 for the i9, 15543 for the i7, a 0.3% gap. R23 single-core lands at 2201 against 2194, once more a 0.3% difference.

The Geekbench single-core result is where the i9-11900T truly separates itself. It scores 2157, while the i7-10700KF manages only 1637. That is a 31.8% advantage for the i9, the largest single-test margin in the entire head-to-head set. This result suggests that the architectural changes in Rocket Lake deliver a substantial per-thread performance uplift over Comet Lake, even when the i7 has a higher boost clock.

Looking at the aggregate picture, the average benchmark score for the i9-11900T sits at 4685, while the i7-10700KF averages 4547. That places the i9 roughly 3% higher on average, a modest overall lead that is heavily influenced by the Geekbench single-core outlier. The i9-11900T sits at the 58th percentile among all CPUs, and the i7-10700KF also sits at the 58th percentile, meaning both chips occupy the same tier in the overall distribution of recorded processors.

The nearest rivals for each chip put these results in context. The i9-11900T is bracketed by the Intel Core i9-10900F at 4664 (0.5% lower), the Intel Core i9-10900E at 4708 (0.5% higher), the Intel Core i9-9900KF at 4652 (0.7% lower), and the Intel Core i7-6950X at 4734 (1% higher). The i7-10700KF, meanwhile, is matched closely by the Intel Xeon E-2356G at 4548 (a 0% delta), the Intel Core i5-1340P at 4545 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748 at 4532 (0.3% lower), and the Intel Xeon W-2145 at 4576 (0.6% higher). These rival lists show that both chips are competitive with their immediate peers, though neither is a standout in its weight class.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split: the Intel Core i9-11900T is the stronger single-threaded performer, while the Intel Core i7-10700KF holds the advantage in Geekbench multicore. The i9-11900T wins seven of eight head-to-head tests, but its wins are mostly narrow, ranging from 0% to 0.4% in Cinebench, with the single exception of the 31.8% blowout in Geekbench single-core. The i7-10700KF loses those close Cinebench battles but wins the Geekbench multicore test by 11.6%, a far larger margin than any of the i9's Cinebench victories.

For users who prioritize single-thread responsiveness, the i9-11900T is the clear choice based on the recorded data. Its Geekbench single-core score of 2157 versus 1637 for the i7 is decisive. For users who prioritize multicore performance in Geekbench specifically, the i7-10700KF delivers a substantially higher score of 9338. The Cinebench multicore tests, however, tell a different story: the i9 wins all three (R15, R20, R23) by 0.3% to 0.4%, meaning the i7's Geekbench multicore advantage does not translate to Cinebench workloads.

The i9-11900T also carries integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 750), while the i7-10700KF has none. This is a practical differentiator for systems that need a display output without a discrete GPU. The i9 is end-of-life in production status, while the i7 is still active, which may matter for availability but is not reflected in benchmark scores.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i9-11900T wins in scenarios that reward single-threaded execution and consistent Cinebench rendering performance. Its Geekbench single-core score of 2157 is 31.8% ahead of the i7, a massive gap that would benefit lightly threaded applications, responsiveness in everyday tasks, and any workload that relies heavily on one or two cores. Its Cinebench wins, while small, are uniform across R15, R20, and R23, covering both single-core and multicore variants. This suggests the i9-11900T has a slight edge in the Cinebench rendering engine specifically.

The Intel Core i7-10700KF wins in the Geekbench multicore test, where it scores 9338 versus 8257 for the i9, an 11.6% advantage. This indicates that in Geekbench's multicore workload, the i7's higher base clock of 3.80 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz, combined with its Comet Lake architecture, produce a better result than the i9's lower-clocked Rocket Lake design (1.50 GHz base, 4.90 GHz boost). Users running Geekbench multicore as a proxy for general parallel performance would favor the i7.

The i7-10700KF also has an unlocked multiplier, meaning it can be overclocked, whereas the i9-11900T is locked. This is a qualitative advantage for enthusiasts, though the database does not include overclocked benchmark results. The i7's lack of integrated graphics is a drawback for systems without a discrete GPU, while the i9's UHD Graphics 750 provides a built-in display solution.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-11900T scores 2157 in Geekbench single-core, which is 31.8% higher than the Intel Core i7-10700KF's 1637. In Cinebench single-core tests, the i9 also leads by 0% to 0.3% depending on the version.

Q: Which processor wins in multicore performance?

A: It depends on the benchmark. The Intel Core i7-10700KF wins Geekbench multicore with 9338 versus 8257 for the i9-11900T, an 11.6% advantage. However, the i9-11900T wins all three Cinebench multicore tests (R15, R20, R23) by margins of 0.3% to 0.4%.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both have 8 cores and 16 threads, according to the recorded specifications.

Q: What is the difference in TDP between the two chips?

A: The Intel Core i9-11900T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core i7-10700KF has a TDP of 125 watts. The i9-11900T is designed for much lower power consumption.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The Intel Core i9-11900T includes UHD Graphics 750, while the Intel Core i7-10700KF has no integrated graphics listed in the database.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i9-11900T has an average benchmark score of 4685, and the Intel Core i7-10700KF has an average of 4547. Both processors sit at the 58th percentile among all CPUs.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different architectural generations from Intel, despite sharing the same socket and core count. The Intel Core i9-11900T is built on the Rocket Lake architecture, which is the 11th generation Core series. The Intel Core i7-10700KF uses the Comet Lake architecture from the 10th generation. Both are fabricated on Intel's 14 nm process node, but Rocket Lake represents a backport of newer CPU cores to that process, while Comet Lake is a refinement of the older Skylake-derived design.

The cache hierarchies differ noticeably. The i9-11900T has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, while the i7-10700KF has 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core. Both share 16 MB of L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 and L2 caches on the i9 likely contribute to its substantial single-thread advantage in Geekbench.

The memory support also differs. Both support DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration, but the i9-11900T has a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while the i7-10700KF has 46.9 GB/s. The PCIe implementation differs as well: the i9-11900T supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the i7-10700KF supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives the i9 a modern I/O advantage.

The die size is recorded for the i9-11900T at 276 mm², while the i7-10700KF has no die size listed. The i9-11900T includes integrated UHD Graphics 750, whereas the i7-10700KF has no integrated graphics. The i9 is marked as end-of-life production status, while the i7 remains active.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge on several key specification fields. The base clock differs significantly: the Intel Core i9-11900T runs at 1500 MHz, while the Intel Core i7-10700KF runs at 3800 MHz. The boost clocks also differ, with the i9 reaching 4.90 GHz and the i7 reaching 5.10 GHz. The i7's higher clocks are a likely factor in its Geekbench multicore win.

TDP is a major differentiator: 35 watts for the i9-11900T versus 125 watts for the i7-10700KF. This reflects the i9's low-power positioning despite being a Core i9 part. The multiplier is unlocked on the i7-10700KF, allowing overclocking, while the i9-11900T is locked.

Cache sizes differ as noted: the i9 has larger L1 (80 KB per core vs 64 KB) and L2 (512 KB per core vs 256 KB), while both have 16 MB shared L3. Memory bandwidth is higher on the i9 at 51.2 GB/s versus 46.9 GB/s. PCIe support differs: Gen 4 with 20 lanes on the i9 versus Gen 3 with 16 lanes on the i7. Integrated graphics are present only on the i9 (UHD Graphics 750).

The release dates differ: the i9-11900T launched on 2021-03-15, while the i7-10700KF launched on 2020-04-29. The i9 has a launch MSRP of $439, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the i7. Production status differs, with the i9 end-of-life and the i7 active. The part numbers also differ: SRKNQ for the i9 and SRH74 for the i7. The architecture and codename fields differ (Rocket Lake vs Comet Lake), and the generation labels reflect the 11th versus 10th generation Core series.