Intel Core i7-1068NG7 vs Intel Xeon D-1715TER Comparison

The Intel Core i7-1068NG7 and Intel Xeon D-1715TER are both 10 nm Ice Lake parts with 4 cores and 8 threads, but they target distinct worlds: one is a mobile chip, the other a server/workstation processor. Benchmark results show they are remarkably close in raw compute, yet their architectural priorities diverge sharply.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data is unambiguous: the Core i7-1068NG7 wins all six Cinebench comparisons, but the margins are razor-thin. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the mobile chip scores 787 against the Xeon’s 779, a 1% advantage. Single-core R15 is nearly identical at 110 versus 109, a 0.9% edge for the Core i7. The pattern holds through R20, where the Core i7 posts 3280 multi-core and 462 single-core, versus the Xeon’s 3249 and 458, again 1% and 0.9% deltas respectively. In R23, the Core i7’s 7810 multi-core and 1102 single-core beat the Xeon’s 7738 and 1092 by 0.9% in both tests.

These differences are effectively noise in real-world workloads. The average benchmark scores reinforce the picture: the Core i7 averages 2259, while the Xeon averages 2238, a gap of less than 1%. Both chips sit at the 47th percentile among all CPUs, meaning they occupy the same performance tier. The nearest rivals for the Core i7 include the Intel Core i3-10305 (avg 2264, -0.2% delta), the Core i5-9400 (avg 2254, +0.2%), and the Core i7-10710U (avg 2248, +0.5%). The Xeon’s rivals include the Xeon D-1548 (avg 2231, +0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 (avg 2246, -0.3%). Both chips are essentially interchangeable in raw compute, with the Core i7 holding a marginal but consistent lead.

The biggest win for the Core i7 is in R23 multi-core, where its 7810 score is 72 points higher than the Xeon’s 7738. That is a 0.9% gap, but it is the largest absolute difference in the dataset. The smallest gap is in R15 single-core, just one point, a 0.9% delta. The Xeon never wins a single benchmark, yet its defeats are so narrow that they carry no practical significance. The data suggests that for pure CPU throughput, either chip would deliver nearly identical results.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the Ice Lake architecture and Intel’s 10 nm process node, but their implementations diverge in ways that matter for their target markets. The Core i7-1068NG7 uses the Ice Lake-U codename and the Sunny Cove-U generation, while the Xeon D-1715TER is Ice Lake-D. The mobile chip fits in an Intel BGA 1344 socket; the server chip uses Intel BGA 2227.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The Core i7 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Xeon has larger per-core caches: 80 KB of L1, 1.25 MB of L2, and 10 MB of shared L3. This gives the Xeon a notable advantage in cache capacity, particularly in L2, which is nearly five times larger per core. The die size for the Core i7 is 123 mm², while the Xeon’s die size is not listed.

Memory support is another clear divergence. Both support DDR4, but the Core i7 uses dual-channel memory with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Xeon uses triple-channel memory with 64.0 GB/s. The Xeon also supports ECC memory, a critical feature for server reliability that the Core i7 lacks. PCIe connectivity differs: the Core i7 has Gen 3, while the Xeon has Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Core i7 includes integrated Iris Plus graphics; the Xeon has no integrated graphics at all.

Clock speeds tell a mixed story. The Core i7 has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The Xeon has a higher base clock of 2.40 GHz but a lower boost of 3.50 GHz. The Core i7’s higher boost clock likely explains its slight single-core wins, while the Xeon’s higher base clock does not translate into multi-core advantages in these tests. TDPs reflect their markets: the Core i7 draws 28 W, the Xeon 50 W.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better single-core performance?

A: The Core i7-1068NG7 wins all three single-core Cinebench tests. It scores 110 versus 109 in R15, 462 versus 458 in R20, and 1102 versus 1092 in R23, each a 0.9% advantage.

Q: Does the Xeon D-1715TER support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory support is listed for the Xeon D-1715TER. The Core i7-1068NG7 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The Core i7-1068NG7 has an average benchmark score of 2259, while the Xeon D-1715TER scores 2238. That is a difference of 21 points, less than 1% of the total.

Q: Which chip has more cache?

A: The Xeon D-1715TER has more cache per core and in total. It has 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with 10 MB of shared L3, versus the Core i7’s 64 KB of L1, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3.

Q: Are these processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both are at the 47th percentile among all CPUs, indicating they outperform roughly half of all processors tested.

Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock?

A: The Core i7-1068NG7 has a boost clock of 4.10 GHz, compared to the Xeon D-1715TER’s 3.50 GHz. The Xeon has a slightly higher base clock at 2.40 GHz versus 2.30 GHz.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: for pure compute performance, the Intel Core i7-1068NG7 is the superior choice, but only by a hair. It wins all six benchmarks, yet its largest margin is just 1%. The Xeon D-1715TER never wins a single test, but its deficits range from 0.9% to 1%, which is statistically negligible. Neither chip dominates the other in practical terms.

The decision comes down to platform features, not speed. The Core i7 is a mobile part with integrated Iris Plus graphics, a 28 W TDP, and dual-channel memory. It is end-of-life and was released in 2019 with a launch MSRP of $320. The Xeon D-1715TER is an active server/workstation part from 2022, with a 50 W TDP, triple-channel memory, ECC support, and PCIe Gen 4. It has no integrated graphics and a larger cache footprint.

Pick the Core i7-1068NG7 if you need a low-power mobile chip with integrated graphics and the highest possible boost clock. Pick the Xeon D-1715TER if you need ECC memory, more cache, higher memory bandwidth, or PCIe Gen 4 connectivity. The Xeon’s higher base clock and triple-channel memory bus are its key advantages, while the Core i7’s higher boost clock and lower power draw define its appeal. The benchmarks say they are equals; the feature sets say they are not interchangeable.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 | Intel Xeon D-1715TER |

|-------|----------------------|----------------------|

| Base Clock | 2.30 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.10 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 50 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1344 | Intel BGA 2227 |

| Codename | Ice Lake-U | Ice Lake-D |

| Generation | Core i7 (Sunny Cove-U) | Xeon D (Ice Lake-D) |

| Die Size | 123 mm² | Not listed |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 10 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Triple-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | false | true |

| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2019-07-31 | 2022-02-23 |

| Launch MSRP | $320 | Not listed |

| Part Number | SRG0U | SRLBX |

| Average Benchmark Score | 2259 | 2238 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 47 | 47 |