Intel Core i5-760 vs Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 Comparison
Intel Core i5-760
Xeon E5-1410 v2
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i5-760 vs Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2
The Intel Core i5-760 and Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 are both end-of-life Intel processors, but they target different segments: the i5-760 is a desktop part from the Nehalem generation, while the Xeon E5-1410 v2 is a server/workstation chip from the Ivy Bridge generation. Benchmark results from the database show a clear overall winner: the Xeon E5-1410 v2 wins all six recorded Cinebench tests, with margins ranging from 2.1% to 3.0%. The i5-760 does have a higher boost clock, but that does not translate into any benchmark victory.
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data leaves no ambiguity: the Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 wins every single benchmark in the head-to-head comparison. Across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, both multi-core and single-core tests, the Xeon leads by consistent margins. The i5-760 has zero wins in the six tested workloads. This means that for any workload represented by these Cinebench tests, whether heavily threaded or lightly threaded, the Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the faster processor.
The i5-760 does have a higher boost clock (3.33 GHz versus 3.20 GHz), but that advantage is not enough to overcome the Xeon's architectural improvements. The Xeon's single-core lead is actually its largest margin: 3.0% in Cinebench R15 single-core. In multi-core tests, the Xeon leads by 2.1% to 2.3%. So the Xeon wins across the board, and the i5-760 has no use case where it comes out ahead in the database's measurements.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different generations and process nodes. The i5-760 is built on Intel's 45 nm process with 774 million transistors on a 296 mm² die, using the Nehalem architecture (Lynnfield). The Xeon E5-1410 v2 uses a 22 nm process with 1,860 million transistors on a 257 mm² die, based on Ivy Bridge (Ivy Bridge-EN). The smaller process node and higher transistor count give the Xeon a more modern foundation.
Core and thread counts differ: the i5-760 has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the Xeon has 4 cores and 8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading. Cache sizes also differ: both have 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, but the L3 cache is 8 MB shared on the i5-760 versus 10 MB shared on the Xeon. Memory support is another split: the i5-760 uses dual-channel DDR3, while the Xeon uses triple-channel DDR3 with a recorded memory bandwidth of 32.0 GB/s. The Xeon also supports ECC memory, which the i5-760 does not.
PCIe capabilities differ as well. The i5-760 provides PCIe Gen 2 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Xeon provides PCIe Gen 3 with 24 lanes (CPU only). The sockets are incompatible: Intel Socket 1156 for the i5-760 and Intel Socket 1356 for the Xeon. The Xeon is a server/workstation part, while the i5-760 is a desktop part. The Xeon has a lower TDP of 80 W versus 95 W for the i5-760, despite having more threads and a larger L3 cache. The release dates are also far apart: the i5-760 launched on 2010-07-17, and the Xeon on 2014-01-08.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more threads?
A: The Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 has 8 threads, while the Intel Core i5-760 has 4 threads. Both have 4 cores.
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core i5-760 has a boost clock of 3.33 GHz, which is higher than the Xeon E5-1410 v2's 3.20 GHz. However, the Xeon still wins all single-core benchmarks.
Q: Does the Xeon support ECC memory?
A: Yes, the Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core i5-760 does not.
Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?
A: The Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 has 10 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core i5-760 has 8 MB.
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 has an average benchmark score of 1368, compared to 1337 for the Intel Core i5-760. The Xeon also sits at the 36th percentile versus the 35th percentile for the i5-760.
Q: Which processor is newer?
A: The Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 was released on 2014-01-08, while the Intel Core i5-760 was released on 2010-07-17.
Specification Differences
| Specification | Intel Core i5-760 | Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 |
|----------------|-------------------|------------------------|
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock | 2.80 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Boost clock | 3.33 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
| TDP | 95 W | 80 W |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1156 | Intel Socket 1356 |
| Architecture | Nehalem | Ivy Bridge |
| Process node | 45 nm | 22 nm |
| Transistors | 774 million | 1,860 million |
| Die size | 296 mm² | 257 mm² |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 10 MB (shared) |
| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Triple-channel |
| Memory bandwidth | Not specified | 32.0 GB/s |
| ECC memory | No | Yes |
| PCIe | Gen 2, 16 lanes | Gen 3, 24 lanes |
| Market segment | Desktop | Server/Workstation |
| Release date | 2010-07-17 | 2014-01-08 |
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1410 v2 wins all six Cinebench tests. The largest margin is in Cinebench R15 single-core, where the Xeon scores 67 versus 65 for the i5-760, a 3.0% lead. In multi-core R15, the Xeon scores 476 versus 466, a 2.1% lead. Moving to Cinebench R20, the Xeon leads by 2.5% in single-core (280 versus 273) and by 2.3% in multi-core (1987 versus 1942). In Cinebench R23, the Xeon again leads by 2.4% in single-core (668 versus 652) and by 2.3% in multi-core (4732 versus 4624).
These margins are consistent across all tests, indicating that the Xeon's advantage is not limited to a specific workload type. The i5-760's higher boost clock (3.33 GHz) does not help it in single-core tests, as the Xeon's newer architecture and higher IPC more than compensate. The Xeon's extra threads also contribute to its multi-core wins, though the margin is similar to the single-core margin, suggesting that the architectural improvements are the primary factor.
The Verdict
Based on the recorded data, the Intel Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the clear choice for any workload represented by these Cinebench benchmarks. It wins every test, offers double the threads, supports ECC memory, has a larger L3 cache, a newer process node, and a lower TDP. The i5-760's only advantages are a higher boost clock and a smaller transistor count, but neither translates into a performance win. For users who need maximum performance in rendering or other multi-threaded tasks, the Xeon is superior. For single-threaded tasks, the Xeon also leads, despite the i5-760's higher clock speed. The Xeon's server/workstation heritage brings features like ECC and triple-channel memory, which are absent on the i5-760. In short, the data shows that the Xeon E5-1410 v2 is the better processor in every measured aspect.