CPU Comparison
Intel Core i5-7500
Core i7-13700E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i5-7500 vs Intel Core i7-13700E
The Intel Core i7-13700E and Intel Core i5-7500 occupy opposite ends of the performance spectrum, yet both sit at the 64th percentile among all CPUs tracked. The data shows an 8–0 sweep for the newer part across every head-to-head benchmark, but the magnitude of that victory varies dramatically by workload. The i7-13700E delivers generational leaps in both single-threaded and heavily parallelized tasks, while the i5-7500 remains a functional, low-power desktop processor from a much earlier era. This analysis breaks down where each chip wins, the architectural chasm between them, and what the benchmark results actually mean for different use cases.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core i7-13700E wins every single benchmark in the comparison, but the margin of victory tells the real story. In multi-threaded workloads, the i7-13700E is utterly dominant. The Cinebench R23 multicore test shows the i7-13700E scoring 27,941 against the i5-7500’s 5,133, a 444.3% advantage. Geekbench multicore tells a similar tale: 12,728 versus 3,619, a 251.7% lead. This is a processor built for rendering, compilation, and any workload that scales across many cores.
For single-threaded performance, the gap narrows but remains decisive. The i7-13700E scores 3,944 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus 724 for the i5-7500, a 444.8% difference. Geekbench single-core shows 2,437 versus 1,277, a 90.8% lead. The i5-7500’s 3.80 GHz boost clock and older Kaby Lake architecture cannot match the i7-13700E’s 5.10 GHz boost and Raptor Lake efficiency. The i7-13700E wins outright in every category, but the i5-7500 does retain relevance in legacy applications where its modest 65W TDP and simple 4-core design may suffice.
The use-case split is clear: the i7-13700E is for demanding, modern workloads that exploit 16 cores and 24 threads, while the i5-7500 is only viable for basic desktop tasks, light office productivity, or older software that does not benefit from additional cores. The i5-7500’s PassMark results, such as 15,768 in integer math and 13,174 in floating point math, show it can handle everyday calculations, but the i7-13700E outperforms it by orders of magnitude in Cinebench and Geekbench tests.
Architecture Differences
The architectural gap between these two processors is massive. The i7-13700E is built on Raptor Lake-S, a 10nm process from Intel, featuring 16 cores and 24 threads. Its cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores, though the data does not specify the core split; the raw numbers indicate a high-throughput design. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, includes ECC memory support, and uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 handles display output, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.
The i5-7500 is a Kaby Lake part on a 14nm process, with just 4 cores and 4 threads. Its cache is far smaller: 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. It supports only DDR4 memory, lacks ECC support, and uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. The integrated HD 630 graphics are older, and the multiplier is locked. The i5-7500 has a listed memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s, a figure not provided for the i7-13700E. The socket changes from LGA 1151 to LGA 1700, meaning no platform compatibility between the two.
Process node differences alone explain much of the performance gap. The 10nm Raptor Lake design allows higher clock speeds, 5.10 GHz boost versus 3.80 GHz, and far greater core density. The i7-13700E also has a much larger L3 cache, which reduces memory latency in data-heavy workloads. The i5-7500’s 14nm process and 4-core layout limit its ability to sustain high throughput, even at similar TDPs. Both chips are rated at 65W, but the i7-13700E extracts far more work per watt due to its modern architecture.
The Verdict
The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-13700E is the superior processor in every measured benchmark. For users running Cinebench R23, Geekbench, or any multi-threaded application, the i7-13700E offers between 251.7% and 444.8% higher performance than the i5-7500. The 16-core, 24-thread configuration, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock and 30 MB of L3 cache, makes it suitable for professional rendering, software compilation, and heavy multitasking. The i5-7500 cannot compete in these scenarios, its 4 cores and 4 threads are simply insufficient for modern parallel workloads.
However, the i5-7500 is not without merit. Its 65W TDP matches the i7-13700E, making it a low-power option for basic systems. It supports DDR4 memory and has a dual-channel memory bus, which is fine for everyday tasks like web browsing, document editing, and media playback. The lack of ECC support and PCIe Gen 3 interface are limitations, but for a simple desktop build, the i5-7500 remains functional. Its PassMark results, including 8,3250 in data compression and 6,971 in extended instructions, show it can handle routine operations without issue.
The choice depends on workload. The i7-13700E is the clear pick for anyone who needs maximum compute throughput, the benchmark results show it is 444.3% ahead in Cinebench R23 multicore and 90.8% ahead in Geekbench single-core. The i5-7500 is only suitable for users with minimal performance requirements who prioritize simplicity over speed. The 64th percentile ranking for both chips is coincidental; the i7-13700E’s average benchmark score of 7,957 places it near rivals like the AMD EPYC 7551P (7,952, 0.1% delta) and Intel Xeon Gold 6326 (8,071, -1.4% delta), while the i5-7500’s average of 8,208 is close to the Intel Core i3-8100 (8,123, 1% delta). These rankings reflect different performance distributions, not equivalence.
FAQ
Q: How much faster is the i7-13700E in multi-core Cinebench R23?
A: The i7-13700E scores 27,941 versus the i5-7500’s 5,133, a 444.3% advantage.
Q: Does the i5-7500 win any benchmark?
A: No. The head-to-head data shows 8 wins for the i7-13700E and 0 for the i5-7500.
Q: What is the single-core performance difference in Geekbench?
A: The i7-13700E scores 2,437, while the i5-7500 scores 1,277, a 90.8% lead for the newer chip.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Only the i7-13700E supports ECC memory. The i5-7500 does not.
Q: What are the socket requirements for each CPU?
A: The i7-13700E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the i5-7500 uses Intel Socket 1151.
Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock?
A: The i7-13700E boosts to 5.10 GHz, compared to the i5-7500’s 3.80 GHz.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The Cinebench R15 multicore test shows the i7-13700E scoring 2,816 against the i5-7500’s 517, a 444.7% delta. This is consistent with the R20 and R23 results, where the i7-13700E leads by 444.5% (11,735 vs. 2,155) and 444.3% (27,941 vs. 5,133), respectively. The consistency across Cinebench versions confirms that the i7-13700E scales linearly with core count and clock speed, while the i5-7500’s 4-core design hits a hard ceiling.
Single-core Cinebench results show an even larger percentage gap. The i7-13700E scores 397 in R15 versus 72 for the i5-7500, a 451.4% delta. In R20, the scores are 1,656 and 304, a 444.7% delta. R23 shows 3,944 versus 724, a 444.8% delta. These margins are stark, the i7-13700E’s 5.10 GHz boost and modern architecture deliver more than five times the single-thread performance of the i5-7500 in Cinebench.
Geekbench results are less extreme but still decisive. The multicore test shows 12,728 for the i7-13700E and 3,619 for the i5-7500, a 251.7% delta. Single-core shows 2,437 versus 1,277, a 90.8% delta. The smaller single-core gap reflects Geekbench’s different workload mix, but the i7-13700E still nearly doubles the i5-7500’s score. The multicore advantage is substantial, driven by the 16-core versus 4-core disparity.
The i5-7500’s PassMark results provide additional context, though no head-to-head comparison exists for those tests. Its data compression score of 8,3250, encryption score of 1,817, and prime number finding score of 28 indicate it handles basic tasks but struggles with complex calculations. The i7-13700E’s absence from PassMark tests means no direct comparison, but the Cinebench and Geekbench deltas, ranging from 90.8% to 451.4%, make the performance hierarchy clear. The i7-13700E is the definitive winner in every measurable category.