Intel Core i5-7400 vs Intel Core i7-13700E Comparison
Intel Core i5-7400
Core i7-13700E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core i5-7400 vs Intel Core i7-13700E
The Intel Core i7-13700E and Intel Core i5-7400 are desktop processors from different generations of Intel's lineup. The i7-13700E is a 16-core Raptor Lake part with 24 threads, while the i5-7400 is a 4-core Kaby Lake chip with 4 threads. Benchmark results from the database show a decisive performance gap, with the i7-13700E winning every head-to-head comparison.
The Verdict
For any workload that scales with core count, the i7-13700E is the clear choice. It wins all eight head-to-head benchmarks, with multi-core deltas exceeding 500% in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23. The single-core advantage is also substantial, ranging from 133.7% in Geekbench to 502.2% in Cinebench R20. The i5-7400, despite its 63rd percentile ranking, is outclassed in every measured metric.
The i7-13700E also brings modern platform features: DDR4 and DDR5 memory support, PCIe Gen 5, ECC memory, and an unlocked multiplier. The i5-7400 is limited to DDR4, PCIe Gen 3, no ECC, and a locked multiplier. For anyone building a new system, the data points squarely to the i7-13700E. The i5-7400 remains relevant only for legacy systems or tasks that do not benefit from additional cores.
Context from the database reinforces this. The i7-13700E has an average benchmark score of 7957, placing it in the 64th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD EPYC 7551P at 7952 (0.1% difference). The i5-7400 averages 7469, ranking in the 63rd percentile, with the Intel Core i5-4570 as its closest competitor at 7421 (0.6% difference). The i7-13700E sits slightly higher in the overall distribution, but the head-to-head results show a far larger gap than the percentile difference suggests.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The i7-13700E has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the i5-7400 has 4 cores and 4 threads.
Q: How do they compare in single-core performance?
A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, the i7-13700E scores 3944 against 657 for the i5-7400, a 500.3% advantage. Geekbench single-core shows 2437 vs 1043, a 133.7% lead.
Q: Do they support the same memory types?
A: No. The i7-13700E supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the i5-7400 supports only DDR4. Both use dual-channel memory buses.
Q: Does the i5-7400 support ECC memory?
A: No. The i7-13700E supports ECC memory, while the i5-7400 does not.
Q: What socket do they use?
A: The i7-13700E uses Intel Socket 1700, while the i5-7400 uses Intel Socket 1151.
Q: Which has a higher boost clock?
A: The i7-13700E boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the i5-7400 boosts to 3.50 GHz.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different architectural eras. The i7-13700E is built on Raptor Lake, using Intel's 10 nm process, while the i5-7400 is Kaby Lake on 14 nm. The i7-13700E has a die size of 257 mm², while the i5-7400's die size is not recorded in the database.
The core configuration differs dramatically. The i7-13700E packs 16 cores and 24 threads, while the i5-7400 has 4 cores and 4 threads. Cache hierarchies also diverge. The i7-13700E has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3. The i5-7400 has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3.
Memory support is another major split. The i7-13700E supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the i5-7400 is limited to DDR4. The i7-13700E also features PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, whereas the i5-7400 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well: the i7-13700E has UHD Graphics 770, while the i5-7400 has HD 630. ECC memory support is present on the i7-13700E but absent on the i5-7400. The i7-13700E has an unlocked multiplier, while the i5-7400 is locked. These architectural differences explain the large performance gap seen in benchmarks.
Specification Differences
| Field | Intel Core i7-13700E | Intel Core i5-7400 |
|-------|----------------------|--------------------|
| Cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Base Clock | 1900 MHz | 3.00 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 3.50 GHz |
| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Kaby Lake |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Die Size | 257 mm² | Not recorded |
| L1 Cache (per core) | 80 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache (per core) | 2 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 Cache (shared) | 30 MB | 6 MB |
| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR4 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Not recorded | 38.4 GB/s |
| ECC Memory | Yes | No |
| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |
| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | HD 630 |
| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2017-01-02 |
| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |
| Part Number | SRMG3 | SR32W |
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The i7-13700E wins all eight head-to-head benchmarks. The largest multi-core advantage appears in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where the i7-13700E scores 2816 against 469, a 500.4% delta. Cinebench R20 multi-core shows 11735 vs 1956, a 499.9% delta. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows 27941 vs 4658, a 499.8% delta. Geekbench multi-core shows 12728 vs 2740, a 364.5% delta.
Single-core results are also lopsided. Cinebench R15 single-core: 397 vs 66, a 501.5% delta. Cinebench R20 single-core: 1656 vs 275, a 502.2% delta. Cinebench R23 single-core: 3944 vs 657, a 500.3% delta. Geekbench single-core: 2437 vs 1043, a 133.7% delta. The i5-7400 does not win any of the eight comparisons.
The multi-core deltas of roughly 500% indicate that the i7-13700E delivers about six times the multi-threaded performance in Cinebench workloads. The single-core advantage is smaller but still substantial, ranging from 133.7% in Geekbench to over 500% in Cinebench R20. These results align with the core count and architecture differences. The i7-13700E's 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, overwhelm the i5-7400's 4 cores and 3.50 GHz ceiling. The cache hierarchy, with 30 MB of shared L3 versus 6 MB, further contributes to the gap. For any application that can use multiple threads, the i7-13700E is the definitive winner. Even in single-threaded tasks, the newer architecture and higher clock speed provide a decisive edge.