Intel Core i5-6600 vs Intel Xeon E-2224 Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core i5-6600

CORE STATE Skylake
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 4 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Skylake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2015
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon E-2224

CORE STATE Coffee Lake-S WS
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 4 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.4 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 71W
ARCHITECTURE Coffee Lake
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2019

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
520
614
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
73
86
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
2,167
2,559
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
305
361
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
5,161
6,093
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
728
860
geekbench_multicore
3,755
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
1,239
N/A

Analysis: Intel Core i5-6600 vs Intel Xeon E-2224

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear sweep: the Intel Xeon E-2224 wins all six recorded head-to-head comparisons against the Intel Core i5-6600. The margins are remarkably consistent, hovering just above 18% in every Cinebench test. In the R15 multicore test, the Xeon scores 614 against the i5's 520, a delta of 18.1%. The single-core R15 result follows the same pattern: 86 versus 73, a 17.8% advantage. This consistency suggests the performance gap is architectural rather than workload-specific, as both chips share the same 4-core, 4-thread configuration.

Moving to R20, the Xeon E-2224 delivers 2559 multicore points while the i5-6600 manages 2167, again an 18.1% difference. The single-core R20 result widens slightly to 18.4%, with scores of 361 and 305 respectively. This near-uniform delta across both multicore and single-core workloads indicates that the Xeon's advantage stems from higher clock speeds and a more efficient design, not from any parallelization benefits, since both processors have identical thread counts.

The R23 tests reinforce the trend. The Xeon posts 6093 multicore and 860 single-core, while the i5-6600 records 5161 and 728. Both deltas sit at 18.1%. The i5-6600 also has a Geekbench result in the database, scoring 3755 multicore and 1239 single-core, but no corresponding Geekbench score exists for the Xeon, so a direct comparison on that test is not possible from the recorded data.

What is striking is the uniformity of the performance gap. Whether rendering a complex scene (R23 multicore) or executing a single-threaded task (R15 single-core), the Xeon E-2224 maintains roughly an 18% lead. This is not a case where one chip excels in burst workloads while the other holds its own in sustained tasks; the Xeon simply outperforms across the board. The database also shows both chips occupy the same 41st percentile among all CPUs, meaning their average benchmark scores place them in similar company globally, despite the Xeon's consistent head-to-head advantage. The Xeon's average benchmark score is 1762, while the i5-6600 averages 1744, a modest overall gap that the Cinebench deltas amplify.

The Verdict

The database is unambiguous: the Intel Xeon E-2224 outperforms the Intel Core i5-6600 in every measured workload. With six wins and zero losses, the Xeon is the superior processor by a margin that stays remarkably stable at 18.1% across most tests. For anyone choosing between these two specific chips, the Xeon delivers higher scores across the board, including single-core performance where the i5-6600 might have been expected to compete more closely given its desktop lineage.

However, the verdict is not purely about raw speed. The i5-6600 has a notably lower TDP of 35 watts compared to the Xeon's 71 watts. That is a substantial power draw difference, and for thermally constrained or low-power systems, the i5-6600 may be the more practical choice despite its lower scores. The Xeon also supports ECC memory, while the i5-6600 does not, which matters for data integrity in server or workstation roles. The i5-6600, by contrast, supports both DDR3 and DDR4, offering more flexibility in memory selection for older platforms.

The launch MSRP for the Xeon E-2224 is $193, while the i5-6600 launched at $224. The database shows the Xeon is both faster and cheaper at launch, but the i5-6600's lower TDP and broader memory compatibility may justify its selection in specific builds. For pure performance, the Xeon wins decisively. For minimal power consumption or legacy DDR3 support, the i5-6600 has a place.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and market segments. The Xeon E-2224 is built on Coffee Lake, specifically the Coffee Lake-S WS variant, and belongs to the Xeon E-2200 series. The i5-6600 is a Skylake desktop chip. Both use a 14 nm process node from Intel, but their die sizes differ: the Xeon measures 126 mm², while the i5-6600 is larger at 177 mm². The smaller die on the Xeon suggests a more refined or denser implementation of the Coffee Lake design.

Cache configurations also diverge. Both chips have 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, but the shared L3 cache differs: the Xeon has 8 MB, the i5-6600 has 6 MB. That 2 MB difference in L3 could contribute to the Xeon's consistent lead, particularly in workloads that benefit from larger working sets. The Xeon's base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost of 4.60 GHz, while the i5-6600 runs at 3.30 GHz base and 3.90 GHz boost. The Xeon's higher boost clock, 0.70 GHz above the i5-6600, likely explains a large portion of the 18% performance gap.

Memory support marks another clear separation. The Xeon supports DDR4 only, in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The i5-6600 supports both DDR3 and DDR4, also dual-channel, but its bandwidth is lower at 34.1 GB/s. The Xeon also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the i5-6600. The integrated graphics differ as well: the Xeon includes UHD Graphics P630, while the i5-6600 has UHD Graphics 530. Both are Intel integrated solutions, but they are distinct SKUs.

The market segments reflect their intended use: the Xeon is marked as Server/Workstation, while the i5-6600 is Desktop. Their production status is identical (end-of-life), and both use the same Intel Socket 1151, making them physically interchangeable in compatible motherboards. The Xeon also has a different part number (SRFAV) versus the i5-6600's SR2BWSR2L5, and neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiator.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core workloads?

A: The Intel Xeon E-2224 wins all recorded single-core tests. In Cinebench R15, it scores 86 versus the i5-6600's 73, a 17.8% advantage. In R20, the scores are 361 versus 305, an 18.4% lead, and in R23, 860 versus 728, an 18.1% lead.

Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?

A: Yes, both the Xeon E-2224 and the Core i5-6600 have 4 cores and 4 threads. The performance difference is therefore not due to core count, but rather to clock speeds, cache size, and architectural generation.

Q: Can the i5-6600 use ECC memory?

A: No, the i5-6600 does not support ECC memory. The Xeon E-2224 does support ECC, which is a key feature for server and workstation environments where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption?

A: The Xeon E-2224 has a TDP of 71 watts, while the i5-6600 has a TDP of 35 watts. The i5-6600 consumes significantly less power, which may be important for compact or energy-efficient builds.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Xeon E-2224 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-6600 has 6 MB. This 2 MB difference can affect performance in cache-sensitive workloads.

Q: Are these processors compatible with the same motherboards?

A: Both use Intel Socket 1151, so they are physically compatible with boards that support that socket. However, the Xeon is from the Coffee Lake generation and the i5-6600 from Skylake, so motherboard BIOS and chipset compatibility may differ in practice.

Where Each One Wins

The Xeon E-2224 wins every benchmark category in the database. It dominates Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 in both multicore and single-core tests, with deltas ranging from 17.8% to 18.4%. Its higher boost clock (4.60 GHz versus 3.90 GHz), larger L3 cache (8 MB versus 6 MB), and superior memory bandwidth (42.7 GB/s versus 34.1 GB/s) make it the clear choice for compute-intensive tasks such as rendering, compilation, or scientific simulations. The ECC memory support further cements its role in workstation or server environments where error correction is non-negotiable.

The i5-6600, despite losing all benchmarks, has its own niches. Its TDP of 35 watts is less than half the Xeon's 71 watts, making it suitable for passively cooled systems, small form factor builds, or any scenario where heat and power draw are primary constraints. Its support for both DDR3 and DDR4 memory means it can be dropped into older motherboards that lack DDR4 slots, extending the life of legacy platforms. The i5-6600 also has a Geekbench score in the database (3755 multicore, 1239 single-core), which the Xeon lacks, but no direct comparison is possible from the recorded data.

For users who prioritize raw performance and can accommodate the higher power draw, the Xeon E-2224 is the unambiguous winner. For those building a low-power desktop or upgrading an existing DDR3 system, the i5-6600 remains a viable, if slower, option. The data does not support any scenario where the i5-6600 outperforms the Xeon in the tested workloads, so the choice hinges entirely on power, memory compatibility, and ECC requirements rather than speed.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. The Xeon E-2224 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the i5-6600 runs at 3.30 GHz base and 3.90 GHz boost. The TDP values are 71 watts for the Xeon and 35 watts for the i5-6600. Die size also differs: the Xeon measures 126 mm², the i5-6600 177 mm². L3 cache is 8 MB on the Xeon versus 6 MB on the i5-6600.

Memory support separates them further: the Xeon supports DDR4 only, with a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, while the i5-6600 supports DDR3 and DDR4 with a bandwidth of 34.1 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on the Xeon but not on the i5-6600. The integrated graphics differ as well: UHD Graphics P630 on the Xeon, UHD Graphics 530 on the i5-6600.

The market segments are distinct: the Xeon is a Server/Workstation part, the i5-6600 is a Desktop part. Their release dates are also different, with the Xeon launching on 2019-05-28 and the i5-6600 on 2015-06-30. The launch MSRP for the Xeon is $193, while the i5-6600 launched at $224. Both share the same socket (Intel Socket 1151), 4 cores, 4 threads, dual-channel memory bus, 14 nm process node, PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes, and locked multipliers. Their production status is end-of-life for both, and both have the same 41st percentile ranking among all CPUs. The Xeon's average benchmark score is 1762, while the i5-6600's is 1744.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
i5-6600
E-2224
Core Specs
Cores
4
4 0.0%
Threads
4
4 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
3.4 +3.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.9
4.6 +17.9%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
3.4 +3.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.9
4.6 +17.9%
Multiplier
33
34 +3.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
64 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
256 KB (per core)
256 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
6 MB (shared)
8 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
35
71 +102.9%
Architecture
Architecture
Skylake
Coffee Lake
Codename
Skylake
Coffee Lake-S WS
Generation
Core i5 (Skylake)
Xeon E (Coffee Lake)
Process Size
14 nm
14 nm
Die Size
177 mm²
126 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR3, DDR4
DDR4
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
34.1 GB/s
42.7 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1151
Intel Socket 1151
Chipsets
Intel 100 Series, Intel 200 Series
C242, C246
PCIe
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 530
UHD Graphics P630
Other
Market
Desktop
Server/Workstation
Production Status
End-of-life
End-of-life
Launch Price
$224
$193
Part Number
SR2BWSR2L5
SRFAV
Package
FC-LGA12C
FC-LGA14C
Bundled Cooler
E97379-001
—
View Core i5-6600 Details View Xeon E-2224 Details