Intel Core i5-5675R vs Intel Core i7-6700TE Comparison

The Intel Core i7-6700TE and Intel Core i5-5675R are both 14 nm desktop processors from 2015, but they target different priorities. The i7-6700TE dominates in multi-threaded rendering workloads thanks to Hyper-Threading, winning six of the eight head-to-head comparisons. The i5-5675R counters decisively in Geekbench tests, which reflect a different performance profile, and carries a launch MSRP of $265. The data shows a clear split: the i7-6700TE is the compute-focused choice, while the i5-5675R leads in single-core-oriented system benchmarks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-6700TE has 8 threads across 4 cores, while the Intel Core i5-5675R has 4 threads across 4 cores. This thread advantage directly contributes to the i7-6700TE’s lead in multi-threaded Cinebench tests.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The i7-6700TE has an average benchmark score of 1666, while the i5-5675R scores 1648. Both processors sit at the 40th percentile among all CPUs, indicating they are closely matched overall, with a difference of about 1.1%.

Q: Which CPU wins in Geekbench tests?

A: The i5-5675R wins both Geekbench tests. It scores 1234 in single-core and 3738 in multi-core, compared to the i7-6700TE’s 1028 and 3154. The i5-5675R leads by 16.7% in single-core and 15.6% in multi-core Geekbench.

Q: What is the difference in memory support?

A: The i7-6700TE supports DDR4 memory with a bandwidth of 34.1 GB/s, while the i5-5675R supports DDR3 with a bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Which CPU has a larger L3 cache?

A: The i7-6700TE has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, double the 4 MB shared L3 cache found on the i5-5675R. This larger cache is part of the i7’s Skylake architecture advantage.

Q: Are these processors unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, both the i7-6700TE and the i5-5675R have locked multipliers. Neither processor supports user overclocking.

Where Each One Wins

The i7-6700TE is the clear winner for heavily multi-threaded workloads. Its 8 threads provide a substantial advantage in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests, where it leads by 11.4% to 11.6% in every instance. For users running rendering, video encoding, or other parallel processing tasks, the data shows the i7-6700TE is consistently faster, with scores like 5273 in Cinebench R23 multi-core versus 4733 for the i5-5675R.

The i5-5675R wins in Geekbench, which is a different benchmark suite. Its scores of 1234 single-core and 3738 multi-core are significantly higher than the i7-6700TE’s 1028 and 3154. This suggests that in system-level tests that measure a broader range of real-world scenarios, the i5-5675R has the edge, despite its lack of Hyper-Threading. The Geekbench multi-core win is particularly notable because the i5-5675R wins despite having only 4 threads, indicating efficiency in that specific workload.

The overall win count is 6-2 in favor of the i7-6700TE. However, the magnitude of the i5-5675R’s Geekbench wins (over 15%) is larger than the i7’s Cinebench margins (around 11%). This means the choice depends heavily on which benchmark suite aligns with the target use case.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs come from different Intel microarchitectures. The i7-6700TE is based on Skylake, while the i5-5675R uses Broadwell. Both are manufactured on Intel’s 14 nm process node and are produced by Intel. The i7-6700TE features a larger 8 MB shared L3 cache, whereas the i5-5675R has a smaller 4 MB shared cache. The i7-6700TE also uses a different socket (Intel Socket 1151) compared to the i5-5675R’s Intel BGA 1364, making them incompatible with the same motherboards.

Memory architecture differs as well. The i7-6700TE supports DDR4 memory, while the i5-5675R supports DDR3. This results in a higher memory bandwidth for the i7-6700TE (34.1 GB/s versus 29.9 GB/s). The integrated graphics are also distinct: the i7-6700TE has HD Graphics 530, while the i5-5675R has Iris Pro Graphics 6200, which is a more powerful iGPU solution.

The die size is a notable difference, with the i5-5675R having a die size of 182 mm², while the i7-6700TE’s die size is not listed. Both processors have the same L1 (64 KB per core) and L2 (256 KB per core) cache sizes, and neither supports ECC memory. They also share the same PCIe configuration: Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-6700TE | Intel Core i5-5675R |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 8 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.40 GHz | 3.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.40 GHz | 3.60 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1151 | Intel BGA 1364 |

| Architecture | Skylake | Broadwell |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR3 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 29.9 GB/s |

| Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |

| Release Date | 2015-08-31 | 2015-05-14 |

| Part Number | SR2LP | SR2AJ |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $265 |

The i5-5675R has higher base and boost clocks, 3.10 GHz and 3.60 GHz respectively, compared to the i7-6700TE’s 2.40 GHz and 3.40 GHz. However, the i7-6700TE has a much lower TDP of 35 W versus 65 W, making it more power-efficient. The i7-6700TE also has double the L3 cache and supports DDR4, while the i5-5675R was released earlier in 2015 and carries a listed launch MSRP of $265.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The i7-6700TE wins every Cinebench test by a consistent margin. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 531 versus 476, a delta of 11.6%. Single-core R15 shows 74 versus 67, a 10.4% lead. The pattern holds in R20 multi-core (2214 vs 1987) and R20 single-core (312 vs 280), both with an 11.4% delta. Cinebench R23 multi-core (5273 vs 4733) and single-core (744 vs 668) also show an 11.4% advantage for the i7-6700TE. This consistency across all Cinebench versions indicates a solid, repeatable performance edge in rendering workloads.

The i5-5675R’s wins are in Geekbench, and they are more pronounced. In Geekbench single-core, it scores 1234 against 1028, a 16.7% lead. In Geekbench multi-core, it scores 3738 against 3154, a 15.6% lead. These are the largest deltas in the entire head-to-head dataset. Interestingly, the i5-5675R wins Geekbench multi-core despite having only 4 threads, while the i7-6700TE has 8 threads. This suggests that the Geekbench multi-core test scales differently than Cinebench, favoring the i5-5675R’s higher clock speeds.

The benchmark results show a clear trade-off. The i7-6700TE leverages its thread count and larger cache to dominate Cinebench, while the i5-5675R uses its higher base and boost clocks to win Geekbench. The average benchmark scores are close (1666 vs 1648), indicating that neither CPU is a runaway winner overall, but the specific workload determines which one comes out ahead.

The Verdict

The Intel Core i7-6700TE is the better choice for multi-threaded rendering applications. It wins all six Cinebench tests, with a consistent 11.4% to 11.6% lead over the i5-5675R in both multi-core and single-core variants. Its 8 threads, 8 MB L3 cache, and DDR4 memory support make it the superior option for tasks that scale with parallel processing. The data strongly supports this verdict: in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i7-6700TE delivers 5273 points versus 4733, a difference that would matter in professional rendering workflows.

The Intel Core i5-5675R is the pick for users who prioritize Geekbench performance or need higher clock speeds. It wins both Geekbench tests by margins of 15.6% and 16.7%, which are the largest wins in the comparison. Its higher 3.10 GHz base clock and 3.60 GHz boost clock give it an advantage in workloads that favor raw frequency over thread count. Additionally, the i5-5675R has a listed launch MSRP of $265, which is a detail worth noting for historical context.

For a general-purpose system, the i7-6700TE offers better overall benchmark diversity, winning 6 out of 8 tests. However, the i5-5675R’s Geekbench dominance cannot be ignored, especially since Geekbench is a widely used metric. The final choice should be guided by the specific benchmark suite that matters most to the user’s intended applications. If the workload is Cinebench-heavy, the i7-6700TE is the clear winner. If Geekbench is the primary metric, the i5-5675R is the better performer. Both processors land at the 40th percentile overall, confirming they are evenly matched but with divergent strengths.