Intel Core i5-5675R vs Intel Core i5-7600T Comparison

The Intel Core i5-7600T and Intel Core i5-5675R are two quad-core desktop processors that target similar performance tiers but achieve their results through different design choices. The benchmark data shows a clear overall winner in the i5-7600T, which takes 7 of 8 head-to-head tests, yet the single loss is significant enough to warrant a closer look at the underlying workloads. This analysis walks through the raw scores, the architectural reasoning, and the practical implications for each processor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking pattern in the head-to-head results is the consistency of the i5-7600T’s victories. Across the entire Cinebench suite, the i5-7600T leads by a margin of roughly 5% in every test. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the i5-7600T scores 500 against the i5-5675R’s 476, a 5% advantage. The single-core R15 test shows a similar gap: 70 versus 67, a 4.5% lead. This pattern holds in R20, where the i5-7600T posts 2086 multicore and 294 single-core against the i5-5675R’s 1987 and 280, respectively — each a 5% delta. The R23 results continue the trend: 4968 versus 4733 in multicore (5%) and 701 versus 668 in single-core (4.9%).

The Geekbench results break the monotony. In Geekbench multicore, the i5-5675R turns the tables decisively, scoring 3738 against the i5-7600T’s 3447. That is a 7.8% swing in favor of the i5-5675R, the largest margin of any test in either direction. However, in Geekbench single-core, the i5-7600T squeaks by with 1246 versus 1234, a narrow 1% edge.

Interpreting these numbers requires looking beyond the raw scores. The Cinebench tests are heavily dependent on sustained CPU throughput and per-core instruction efficiency. The i5-7600T’s lead there suggests its newer architecture extracts more work per clock cycle. The Geekbench multicore result, however, indicates that the i5-5675R handles certain multithreaded workloads better, likely due to its higher base clock of 3.10 GHz compared to the i5-7600T’s 2.80 GHz. The i5-5675R’s boost clock is lower (3.60 GHz versus 3.70 GHz), but for workloads that stay near base frequency, the higher base clock gives it an edge.

The average benchmark scores put the two essentially at parity: the i5-7600T averages 1664 across all tests, while the i5-5675R averages 1648. That is a 0.9% difference, well within the noise of the nearest rival comparisons. Both processors sit at the 40th percentile among all CPUs, meaning they land in the same broad performance tier. The nearest rivals confirm this: the i5-7600T sits within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-6700TE, Core i7-4770HQ, Xeon E-2124, and Core i5-4670K, while the i5-5675R sits within 0.3% of the Core i7-4810MQ, Core i7-5700HQ, Opteron 6380, and Ryzen 5 3550H.

The story is one of near-total dominance in one benchmark suite and a single, sizeable reversal in another. The i5-7600T wins 7 tests, but the i5-5675R’s one win is by a larger margin than any of the i5-7600T’s wins.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-7600T boosts to 3.70 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-5675R boosts to 3.60 GHz. The i5-7600T also has a lower base clock at 2.80 GHz compared to the i5-5675R’s 3.10 GHz.

Q: How much faster is the i5-7600T in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The i5-7600T scores 4968 in Cinebench R23 multicore against the i5-5675R’s 4733, a 5% advantage. This mirrors the 5% deltas seen in Cinebench R15 and R20 multicore tests.

Q: Where does the i5-5675R outperform the i5-7600T?

A: The i5-5675R wins the Geekbench multicore test with a score of 3738 versus 3447, a 7.8% lead. This is the only benchmark in the head-to-head set where the i5-5675R comes out ahead.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The i5-7600T averages 1664 across all benchmarks, while the i5-5675R averages 1648. The difference is 16 points, or roughly 0.9%.

Q: Do both processors occupy the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both sit at the 40th percentile among all CPUs. Their nearest rivals also cluster tightly, with the i5-7600T’s rivals within 0.5% and the i5-5675R’s rivals within 0.3% of their respective average scores.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference?

A: The i5-7600T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the i5-5675R has a TDP of 65 watts. The i5-7600T draws less power despite winning most benchmarks.

The Verdict

The data points overwhelmingly toward the Intel Core i5-7600T as the better overall processor. It wins 7 of 8 head-to-head benchmarks, including every single-core test, and does so while consuming 35 watts versus the i5-5675R’s 65 watts. The i5-7600T’s wins are consistent and meaningful: a 5% advantage in Cinebench multicore and a 4.5-5% advantage in single-core tests.

However, the verdict is not absolute. The i5-5675R’s 7.8% win in Geekbench multicore is the largest margin in the entire comparison. For workloads that resemble that benchmark — specifically, those that benefit from a higher base clock and are less sensitive to per-core architectural improvements — the i5-5675R has a genuine edge. The i5-5675R’s 3.10 GHz base clock is 10.7% higher than the i5-7600T’s 2.80 GHz, which explains its ability to win a multithreaded test despite losing single-core tests.

The i5-7600T is the safer choice for general-purpose computing, given its broader benchmark dominance and lower power draw. The i5-5675R is the pick only if the specific workload profile aligns with its Geekbench multicore strength. The average scores are nearly identical, but the distribution of wins favors the i5-7600T.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several core specifications beyond their benchmark results. The i5-7600T uses the Intel Socket 1151, while the i5-5675R uses the Intel BGA 1364 socket. This is a fundamental compatibility difference: the i5-7600T is a socketed desktop processor, while the i5-5675R is a ball-grid-array package, typically soldered to the motherboard.

The i5-7600T has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 3.70 GHz, versus the i5-5675R’s 3.10 GHz base and 3.60 GHz boost. The i5-7600T has a TDP of 35 watts, while the i5-5675R draws 65 watts. Memory support also differs: the i5-7600T supports DDR4 with a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s, while the i5-5675R supports DDR3 with a bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses and PCIe Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes.

The integrated graphics differ as well: the i5-7600T comes with HD 630, while the i5-5675R comes with Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as Active in production status. The i5-5675R has a launch MSRP of $265; the i5-7600T has no listed launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these two is a matter of generation and design philosophy. The i5-7600T is built on Kaby Lake, while the i5-5675R is built on Broadwell. Both use a 14 nm process node from Intel, so the transistor manufacturing is identical. However, the design ages differ: the i5-7600T is from the Kaby Lake generation, while the i5-5675R is from the Broadwell generation.

The cache layouts differ in the L3 tier. The i5-7600T offers 6 MB of shared L3 cache, while the i5-5675R offers 4 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have the same L1 cache at 64 KB per core and L2 cache at 256 KB per core. The i5-5675R has a die size of 182 mm², while the i5-7600T’s die size is not listed.

The memory controller is tied to the architecture. Kaby Lake pairs with DDR4, and Broadwell pairs with DDR3. This is not just a spec sheet difference; it affects the memory bandwidth, with the i5-7600T achieving 38.4 GB/s versus the i5-5675R’s 29.9 GB/s. The i5-5675R’s integrated graphics are the higher-tier Iris Pro 6200, while the i5-7600T uses the more modest HD 630.

The benchmark results suggest that the Kaby Lake architecture in the i5-7600T has better per-core efficiency, as evidenced by its single-core wins in both Cinebench and Geekbench. The Broadwell architecture in the i5-5675R compensates with a higher base clock, which shows up in the Geekbench multicore win. The smaller L3 cache in the i5-5675R (4 MB versus 6 MB) does not appear to hurt it in the benchmarks where it wins, but it may explain some of the Cinebench deficits.

Where Each One Wins

The i5-7600T wins in every Cinebench scenario, both single-core and multicore, across R15, R20, and R23. This makes it the clear choice for rendering, video encoding, and any workload that relies on sustained CPU throughput. Its single-core advantage is consistent, so it also handles everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light gaming with a measurable edge. The lower TDP of 35 watts means it generates less heat and requires less robust cooling, which is a practical advantage for compact systems.

The i5-5675R wins only in Geekbench multicore, but that win is substantial at 7.8%. This suggests it performs better in workloads that are sensitive to raw clock speed across all cores simultaneously, even if each core is individually less efficient. Tasks that involve heavy multithreading with simple instructions — certain scientific simulations, some database operations, or parallel compilations — may favor the i5-5675R’s higher base clock. The Iris Pro 6200 graphics are also a differentiator, offering more capable integrated graphics than the HD 630, though the benchmark data does not include graphics tests.

For a user who prioritizes single-core responsiveness and overall benchmark consistency, the i5-7600T is the superior part. For a user whose applications specifically resemble the Geekbench multicore workload and who can tolerate the higher power draw, the i5-5675R has a legitimate claim. The average scores are too close to call a winner on that metric alone, but the distribution of wins strongly favors the i5-7600T for general use.